Patient and public involvement in academic clinical research in Switzerland - a mixed methods study.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Swiss medical weekly Pub Date : 2024-12-06 DOI:10.57187/s.3563
Deborah Eberle, Annina Bauer, Cordula Landgraf, Joëlle Roos, Regina Grossmann
{"title":"Patient and public involvement in academic clinical research in Switzerland - a mixed methods study.","authors":"Deborah Eberle, Annina Bauer, Cordula Landgraf, Joëlle Roos, Regina Grossmann","doi":"10.57187/s.3563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While patient and public involvement (PPI) in clinical research contributes substantially to research ethics, feasibility and quality, the uptake and implementation of PPI-based approaches in Switzerland remain unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the current state and acceptance of PPI in academic clinical research in Switzerland, with the goal of developing recommendations for its future implementation and development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A sequential explanatory mixed-methods study was conducted to assess the current landscape and acceptance of PPI in academic clinical research across different stakeholder groups in Switzerland. The groups were \"Patients and Public\", \"Researchers\", \"Staff Members of Academic Research Infrastructure (ARI)\" and representatives from \"Regulatory and Funding Bodies\". Data was collected through a combination of surveys and semi-structured interviews. The survey results were analysed descriptively, while interview data was analysed qualitatively. The results were further synthesised into a SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> A total of 123 survey responses were collected.Surveys revealed great support and acceptance for PPI in academic clinical research in Switzerland across all stakeholder groups. Despite this support, several challenges were identified, including gaps in training, limited funding opportunities and insufficient infrastructure to facilitate PPI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current framework for PPI in Switzerland is in an early stage of development. A joint effort by all stakeholders is needed to catch up with international progress to reach high-level ethical and quality standards. A basic framework for PPI in academic clinical research in Switzerland should be implemented, including guidelines for qualification and collaboration, best practices as well as widespread information for patients, the public and researchers. Further needed are training opportunities in \"PPI in clinical research\" for all stakeholders as well as sustainable sources of funding.</p>","PeriodicalId":22111,"journal":{"name":"Swiss medical weekly","volume":"154 ","pages":"3563"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swiss medical weekly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57187/s.3563","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While patient and public involvement (PPI) in clinical research contributes substantially to research ethics, feasibility and quality, the uptake and implementation of PPI-based approaches in Switzerland remain unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the current state and acceptance of PPI in academic clinical research in Switzerland, with the goal of developing recommendations for its future implementation and development.

Methods: A sequential explanatory mixed-methods study was conducted to assess the current landscape and acceptance of PPI in academic clinical research across different stakeholder groups in Switzerland. The groups were "Patients and Public", "Researchers", "Staff Members of Academic Research Infrastructure (ARI)" and representatives from "Regulatory and Funding Bodies". Data was collected through a combination of surveys and semi-structured interviews. The survey results were analysed descriptively, while interview data was analysed qualitatively. The results were further synthesised into a SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats) analysis.

Results:  A total of 123 survey responses were collected.Surveys revealed great support and acceptance for PPI in academic clinical research in Switzerland across all stakeholder groups. Despite this support, several challenges were identified, including gaps in training, limited funding opportunities and insufficient infrastructure to facilitate PPI.

Conclusion: The current framework for PPI in Switzerland is in an early stage of development. A joint effort by all stakeholders is needed to catch up with international progress to reach high-level ethical and quality standards. A basic framework for PPI in academic clinical research in Switzerland should be implemented, including guidelines for qualification and collaboration, best practices as well as widespread information for patients, the public and researchers. Further needed are training opportunities in "PPI in clinical research" for all stakeholders as well as sustainable sources of funding.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者和公众参与学术临床研究在瑞士-混合方法研究。
背景:虽然临床研究中的患者和公众参与(PPI)对研究伦理、可行性和质量做出了重大贡献,但在瑞士,基于PPI的方法的吸收和实施仍然未知。本研究旨在评估瑞士学术临床研究中PPI的现状和接受程度,目的是为其未来的实施和发展提出建议。方法:进行了一项顺序解释性混合方法研究,以评估瑞士不同利益相关者群体在学术临床研究中PPI的现状和接受程度。这些小组分别是“患者和公众”、“研究人员”、“学术研究基础设施(ARI)的工作人员”和“监管和资助机构”的代表。数据是通过调查和半结构化访谈相结合的方式收集的。对调查结果进行描述性分析,对访谈数据进行定性分析。结果进一步合成为SWOT(优势,劣势,机会和威胁)分析。结果:共收集调查问卷123份。调查显示,在瑞士所有利益相关者群体的学术临床研究中,PPI得到了极大的支持和接受。尽管有这些支持,但仍发现了一些挑战,包括培训差距、资金机会有限以及促进PPI的基础设施不足。结论:目前瑞士的PPI框架尚处于早期发展阶段。需要所有利益攸关方共同努力,以赶上国际进展,达到高水平的道德和质量标准。应该在瑞士实施临床学术研究中PPI的基本框架,包括资格和合作指南、最佳实践以及为患者、公众和研究人员提供广泛的信息。进一步需要的是为所有利益攸关方提供“临床研究中的PPI”培训机会,以及可持续的资金来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Swiss medical weekly
Swiss medical weekly 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Swiss Medical Weekly accepts for consideration original and review articles from all fields of medicine. The quality of SMW publications is guaranteed by a consistent policy of rigorous single-blind peer review. All editorial decisions are made by research-active academics.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing interprofessional ward rounds by identifying factors associated with low satisfaction and efficiency: a quantitative and qualitative national survey of Swiss healthcare professionals. Outcomes of coronary artery aneurysms: insights from the Coronary Artery Ectasia and Aneurysm Registry (CAESAR). Economic evaluation in the treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the Swiss healthcare system: a retrospective cost evaluation. Improving sex and gender equity in research protocols: the new SAGER-swissethics recommendations. Patient and public involvement in academic clinical research in Switzerland - a mixed methods study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1