[Organ donation after euthanasia].

Q4 Medicine Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie Pub Date : 2025-01-01
W N K A van Mook, N M van Dijk, W C de Jongh, R C Oude Voshaar, R M Marijnissen, J A M Bollen, J A Godschalx-Dekker
{"title":"[Organ donation after euthanasia].","authors":"W N K A van Mook, N M van Dijk, W C de Jongh, R C Oude Voshaar, R M Marijnissen, J A M Bollen, J A Godschalx-Dekker","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the Netherlands, it is possible for patients to donate organs after having received euthanasia. In many cases of organ donation after euthanasia (ODE), tissues, as well as the liver, heart, kidneys, lungs, and pancreas, can be donated. The procedure for ODE is described in the national guideline for organ donation after euthanasia by the Dutch Transplant Foundation (NTS). In case of suffering due to a psychiatric disorder, the guideline of the Dutch Psychiatric Association is directional. Recently, the Erasmus MC suggested an assessment by an additional local psychiatrist.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To argue that current guidelines on euthanasia and organ donation offer a sufficient foundation for providing careful and conscientious care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Discussion of the background and practice of euthanasia and organ donation and the guidelines relevant for assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>By following the current Euthanasia Code, the Dutch Psychiatric Association guideline and the NTS ODE guideline, the euthanasia and donation processes are separated and the carefulness of the assessment is guaranteed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In case of suffering from a psychiatric disorder, extra caution is currently guaranteed by involving a second independent psychiatrist. An structural additional assessment by a local psychiatrist can disrupt both the euthanasia and organ donation assessment procedures, stigmatize psychiatric patients compared to those suffering from somatic disorders, and is unnecessarily burdensome for the patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":23100,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie","volume":"67 1","pages":"24-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the Netherlands, it is possible for patients to donate organs after having received euthanasia. In many cases of organ donation after euthanasia (ODE), tissues, as well as the liver, heart, kidneys, lungs, and pancreas, can be donated. The procedure for ODE is described in the national guideline for organ donation after euthanasia by the Dutch Transplant Foundation (NTS). In case of suffering due to a psychiatric disorder, the guideline of the Dutch Psychiatric Association is directional. Recently, the Erasmus MC suggested an assessment by an additional local psychiatrist.

Aim: To argue that current guidelines on euthanasia and organ donation offer a sufficient foundation for providing careful and conscientious care.

Method: Discussion of the background and practice of euthanasia and organ donation and the guidelines relevant for assessment.

Results: By following the current Euthanasia Code, the Dutch Psychiatric Association guideline and the NTS ODE guideline, the euthanasia and donation processes are separated and the carefulness of the assessment is guaranteed.

Conclusion: In case of suffering from a psychiatric disorder, extra caution is currently guaranteed by involving a second independent psychiatrist. An structural additional assessment by a local psychiatrist can disrupt both the euthanasia and organ donation assessment procedures, stigmatize psychiatric patients compared to those suffering from somatic disorders, and is unnecessarily burdensome for the patient.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[安乐死后的器官捐赠]。
背景:在荷兰,病人在接受安乐死后可以捐献器官。在安乐死(ODE)后器官捐赠的许多情况下,组织以及肝脏、心脏、肾脏、肺和胰腺都可以捐赠。荷兰移植基金会(NTS)在安乐死后器官捐赠的国家指南中描述了ODE的程序。在因精神障碍而遭受痛苦的情况下,荷兰精神病学协会的指导方针是指向性的。最近,伊拉斯谟管委会建议由另一名当地精神病医生进行评估。目的:论证目前关于安乐死和器官捐赠的指导方针为提供谨慎和认真的护理提供了充分的基础。方法:探讨安乐死与器官捐献的背景、实践及相关评估指南。结果:通过遵循现行的安乐死法典、荷兰精神病学协会指南和NTS ODE指南,将安乐死和捐赠过程分开,保证了评估的谨慎性。结论:在患有精神疾病的情况下,目前通过涉及第二名独立精神科医生来保证额外的谨慎。由当地精神科医生进行的结构性额外评估可能会扰乱安乐死和器官捐赠的评估程序,使精神病患者与躯体疾病患者相比受到污名化,并给患者带来不必要的负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie
Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
118
期刊最新文献
[Compulsory care for a mental incompetent pregnant woman: a case-report]. [Erotomania as a symptom of pathological grief]. [The nurse practitioner as responsible clinician: opportunities and challenges]. [Underexposed consequences of assisted death on psychiatric grounds for mental health care]. [Verplichte zorg bij een wilsonbekwame zwangere: maatwerk met respect voor mensenrechten].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1