Efficacy and safety of acupuncture with moxibustion for knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 6.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Systematic Reviews Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1186/s13643-025-02762-x
Rui-Xin Zhu, Xing Li, Zhao-Bo Yan, Cheng Chen, Wei Zhai, Heng-Cai Zhang, Wen-Juan Ma, Fu-Kun Wang, Mi Liu, Ge-Shu Du
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of acupuncture with moxibustion for knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Rui-Xin Zhu, Xing Li, Zhao-Bo Yan, Cheng Chen, Wei Zhai, Heng-Cai Zhang, Wen-Juan Ma, Fu-Kun Wang, Mi Liu, Ge-Shu Du","doi":"10.1186/s13643-025-02762-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Osteoarthritis (OA) is prevalent, yet its management remains challenging. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy of acupuncture combined with moxibustion versus other standard treatments in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Searches were conducted in Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to retrieve relevant RCTs. Data on baseline characteristics, treatment efficacy, and adverse events were extracted. The analysis utilized pooled weighted mean differences (WMD) and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the superior treatment modality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 18 RCTs were included. Acupuncture combined with moxibustion demonstrated significant improvement in the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and the long-term (> 60 weeks) Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores for pain, stiffness, and physical function compared to other treatments. In contrast, short- (< 4 weeks) and mid-term (6-60 weeks) WOMAC outcomes for pain, stiffness, and physical function indicated varied results. The overall efficacy rate also favored the combined therapy significantly in the short- and mid-term evaluations. Notably, this therapy was associated with fewer adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The meta-analysis reveals that acupuncture combined with moxibustion is notably more effective and safer than other treatment modalities for KOA, particularly during mid- and long-term follow-up periods.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"14 1","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11737046/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02762-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) is prevalent, yet its management remains challenging. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy of acupuncture combined with moxibustion versus other standard treatments in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods: Searches were conducted in Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to retrieve relevant RCTs. Data on baseline characteristics, treatment efficacy, and adverse events were extracted. The analysis utilized pooled weighted mean differences (WMD) and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the superior treatment modality.

Results: A total of 18 RCTs were included. Acupuncture combined with moxibustion demonstrated significant improvement in the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and the long-term (> 60 weeks) Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores for pain, stiffness, and physical function compared to other treatments. In contrast, short- (< 4 weeks) and mid-term (6-60 weeks) WOMAC outcomes for pain, stiffness, and physical function indicated varied results. The overall efficacy rate also favored the combined therapy significantly in the short- and mid-term evaluations. Notably, this therapy was associated with fewer adverse events.

Conclusion: The meta-analysis reveals that acupuncture combined with moxibustion is notably more effective and safer than other treatment modalities for KOA, particularly during mid- and long-term follow-up periods.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针灸治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
背景:骨关节炎(OA)很普遍,但其治疗仍然具有挑战性。本荟萃分析旨在基于随机对照试验(rct)评价针刺结合艾灸治疗膝骨关节炎(KOA)与其他标准治疗的疗效。方法:在Ovid MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials中检索相关的随机对照试验。提取基线特征、治疗疗效和不良事件的数据。分析采用95%置信区间(ci)的合并加权平均差异(WMD)和风险比(RR)来评估优越的治疗方式。结果:共纳入18项rct。与其他治疗方法相比,针灸联合艾灸在疼痛的视觉模拟评分(VAS)和长期(bbb60周)西安大略省和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)疼痛、僵硬和身体功能评分方面均有显着改善。结论:荟萃分析显示,针刺结合艾灸治疗KOA明显比其他治疗方式更有效、更安全,特别是在中长期随访期间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
期刊最新文献
Ultra-processed foods and risk of all-cause mortality: an updated systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Using virtual patients to enhance empathy in medical students: a scoping review protocol. Research priority setting for implementation science and practice: a living systematic review protocol. Self-care interventions among women with gestational diabetes mellitus in low and middle-income countries: a scoping review. Caregiver experiences and needs in pediatric rheumatic disease: a mixed-methods systematic review protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1