Patient experience in a radiation therapy department pre- and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Supportive Care in Cancer Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1007/s00520-024-09137-3
Demetra Yannitsos, Petra Grendarova, Linda Watson, Lisa Barbera
{"title":"Patient experience in a radiation therapy department pre- and during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Demetra Yannitsos, Petra Grendarova, Linda Watson, Lisa Barbera","doi":"10.1007/s00520-024-09137-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Longitudinal collection of patient experience data promotes continual high-quality care and guides quality improvement (QI) work. The purpose of this study was to investigate patient experience in the radiation department during COVID-19 and compare results to previous data collected in 2019.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patient experience data was collected using the Your Voice Matters (YVM) survey. Recruitment occurred between April and June 2022. Consecutive patients were approached to complete the YVM regarding their consultation or radiation treatment appointment. The proportion of patients with positive experience scores was calculated for 2022 results. Unadjusted results were compared between 2019 and 2022. The adjusted analysis included logistic regression modelling to evaluate factors associated with an overall positive experience. Content analysis was completed for current qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 400 patients completed the YVM regarding their consultation or radiation treatment. The most favorable experiences included polite reception staff and feeling respected and listened to. Compared to 2019, there was no significant difference in overall experience scores. Results showed improvements in wait times for consultations (p < 0.01) and treatments (p < 0.01). Despite improvements, wait times and contacting the clinic remain areas with the lowest scores. In 2022, patients with breast cancer had greater odds of a positive experience compared to lung.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients at our institution continued to have positive experiences over time, despite the pandemic. Improvements were most evident with wait times. Other items including contacting the clinic remain areas for improvement. These results guided various QI work in our department to improve communication, clinic flow, and other aspects of patient experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"33 2","pages":"106"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-09137-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Longitudinal collection of patient experience data promotes continual high-quality care and guides quality improvement (QI) work. The purpose of this study was to investigate patient experience in the radiation department during COVID-19 and compare results to previous data collected in 2019.

Methods: Patient experience data was collected using the Your Voice Matters (YVM) survey. Recruitment occurred between April and June 2022. Consecutive patients were approached to complete the YVM regarding their consultation or radiation treatment appointment. The proportion of patients with positive experience scores was calculated for 2022 results. Unadjusted results were compared between 2019 and 2022. The adjusted analysis included logistic regression modelling to evaluate factors associated with an overall positive experience. Content analysis was completed for current qualitative data.

Results: Overall, 400 patients completed the YVM regarding their consultation or radiation treatment. The most favorable experiences included polite reception staff and feeling respected and listened to. Compared to 2019, there was no significant difference in overall experience scores. Results showed improvements in wait times for consultations (p < 0.01) and treatments (p < 0.01). Despite improvements, wait times and contacting the clinic remain areas with the lowest scores. In 2022, patients with breast cancer had greater odds of a positive experience compared to lung.

Conclusions: Patients at our institution continued to have positive experiences over time, despite the pandemic. Improvements were most evident with wait times. Other items including contacting the clinic remain areas for improvement. These results guided various QI work in our department to improve communication, clinic flow, and other aspects of patient experience.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在COVID-19大流行之前和期间在放射治疗部门的患者经验。
目的:纵向收集患者体验数据,促进持续高质量护理,指导质量改进(QI)工作。本研究的目的是调查患者在COVID-19期间在放射科的经历,并将结果与2019年收集的数据进行比较。方法:采用“你的声音很重要”(YVM)调查收集患者体验数据。招聘在2022年4月至6月期间进行。连续的患者被要求完成关于他们的咨询或放射治疗预约的YVM。计算2022年结果中体验得分为正的患者比例。未经调整的结果在2019年和2022年之间进行了比较。调整后的分析包括逻辑回归模型,以评估与整体积极体验相关的因素。对现有定性数据进行内容分析。结果:总体而言,400名患者完成了关于会诊或放射治疗的YVM。最令人满意的经历包括接待人员的礼貌,感觉受到尊重和倾听。与2019年相比,总体体验得分没有显著差异。结果显示,就诊等待时间有所改善(p结论:尽管大流行,但随着时间的推移,我们机构的患者仍然有积极的经历。等待时间的改善最为明显。其他项目包括联系诊所仍有待改进。这些结果指导了我们科室的各种QI工作,以改善沟通、临床流程和其他方面的患者体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Supportive Care in Cancer
Supportive Care in Cancer 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
751
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease. Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.
期刊最新文献
Methodologies and characteristics of studies investigating the cost of the palliative phase of cancer: a systematic review. The citizen perspective on challenges and rehabilitation needs among individuals treated for head and neck cancer: a qualitative study. "The biggest challenge is there's never a routine": a qualitative study of the time burdens of cancer care at home. Musculoskeletal symptoms associated with aromatase inhibitors in the treatment of early breast cancer: A scoping review of risk factors and outcomes. Sleep quality in lung cancer and specifically non-small-cell lung cancer: a rapid review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1