Effect of electronic cigarette atomising power and flavour on aerosol size-segregated metal concentration and inhalation risk.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Tobacco Control Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1136/tc-2024-058915
Jinho Lee, Masoud Afshar, Wei-Chung Su, Inkyu Han
{"title":"Effect of electronic cigarette atomising power and flavour on aerosol size-segregated metal concentration and inhalation risk.","authors":"Jinho Lee, Masoud Afshar, Wei-Chung Su, Inkyu Han","doi":"10.1136/tc-2024-058915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although numerous studies have estimated the inhalation dose of metals emitted from electronic cigarettes (e-cigs), the impact of factors including aerosol size and the atomising power of e-cig aerosols on estimating the inhalation dose of metals remains underexplored. A comprehensive understanding of these determinants is essential to assess the health risks associated with inhaling e-cig aerosols, which may contain potentially harmful metals.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study is to elucidate the mass and inhalation doses of potentially harmful metals in e-cig aerosols by different particle size and their association with the various atomising powers of e-cig devices and flavours.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Size-segregated e-cig aerosols were generated and collected in a exposure chamber, using an 11-stage cascade impactor for the analyses of aerosol mass and metals. The metal deposition dose in the human respiratory tract was calculated using a mathematical respiratory deposition estimation model and metal mass concentration by the size of aerosols.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, the results showed that neither an increase in atomising power (from 5 to 20 W) nor e-cig flavours resulted in a significant increase in a metal deposition in the respiratory tracts. Although the factors did not significantly affect the calculated respiratory deposition of harmful metals under typical e-cig usage assumption, the estimated hazard index exceeded 1.0.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The calculated health risks suggest substantial risks of inhalation of metal aerosols from e-cig use.</p>","PeriodicalId":23145,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tc-2024-058915","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Although numerous studies have estimated the inhalation dose of metals emitted from electronic cigarettes (e-cigs), the impact of factors including aerosol size and the atomising power of e-cig aerosols on estimating the inhalation dose of metals remains underexplored. A comprehensive understanding of these determinants is essential to assess the health risks associated with inhaling e-cig aerosols, which may contain potentially harmful metals.

Objectives: The aim of this study is to elucidate the mass and inhalation doses of potentially harmful metals in e-cig aerosols by different particle size and their association with the various atomising powers of e-cig devices and flavours.

Methods: Size-segregated e-cig aerosols were generated and collected in a exposure chamber, using an 11-stage cascade impactor for the analyses of aerosol mass and metals. The metal deposition dose in the human respiratory tract was calculated using a mathematical respiratory deposition estimation model and metal mass concentration by the size of aerosols.

Results: In this study, the results showed that neither an increase in atomising power (from 5 to 20 W) nor e-cig flavours resulted in a significant increase in a metal deposition in the respiratory tracts. Although the factors did not significantly affect the calculated respiratory deposition of harmful metals under typical e-cig usage assumption, the estimated hazard index exceeded 1.0.

Conclusion: The calculated health risks suggest substantial risks of inhalation of metal aerosols from e-cig use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电子烟的雾化功率和香味对气溶胶大小分离金属浓度和吸入风险的影响。
导言:尽管许多研究已经估计了电子烟(e-cigs)释放的金属的吸入剂量,但包括气溶胶大小和电子烟气溶胶的雾化能力在内的因素对估计金属吸入剂量的影响仍未得到充分探讨。全面了解这些决定因素对于评估与吸入可能含有潜在有害金属的电子烟气溶胶有关的健康风险至关重要。目的:本研究的目的是阐明电子烟气溶胶中不同粒径的潜在有害金属的质量和吸入剂量,以及它们与电子烟设备和口味的不同雾化能力的关系。方法:在暴露室中产生并收集大小分离的电子烟气溶胶,使用11级级冲击器分析气溶胶质量和金属。采用呼吸道沉积数学估计模型和气溶胶的金属质量浓度计算了人体呼吸道的金属沉积剂量。结果:在这项研究中,结果表明,无论是雾化功率(从5到20 W)的增加,还是电子烟口味的增加,都不会导致呼吸道金属沉积的显著增加。在典型电子烟使用假设下,虽然各因素对计算的有害金属呼吸沉积没有显著影响,但估计的危害指数超过1.0。结论:计算得出的健康风险提示电子烟吸入金属气溶胶存在较大风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tobacco Control
Tobacco Control 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
26.90%
发文量
223
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Tobacco Control is an international peer-reviewed journal covering the nature and consequences of tobacco use worldwide; tobacco''s effects on population health, the economy, the environment, and society; efforts to prevent and control the global tobacco epidemic through population-level education and policy changes; the ethical dimensions of tobacco control policies; and the activities of the tobacco industry and its allies.
期刊最新文献
Australian adolescents' knowledge of smoking harms and misperceptions about tobacco products: a cross-sectional study. Effects of retail environment regulations on reducing tobacco retailers and operating hours: a case study in Egypt. Online retailer noncompliance to e-cigarette excise tax and tobacco licensing laws. Vaping cessation interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Swisher Blunts: the consequences of assembly no longer being required.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1