The Diagnostic Yield of Genomic Sequencing-Based Genetic Kidney Disease Testing in Kidney Transplant Candidates: Experience at an Urban US Transplant Center.
Fadee Abu Al Rub, Rengin Elsurer Afsar, Vidya A Fleetwood, Bahar Bastani, Henry Randall, Mustafa Nazzal, Chintalapati Varma, Baris Afsar, Holly Jackson, Shannon Yount, Cody Wooley, Jennifer Light, Virginia Davis, Yasar Caliskan, Krista L Lentine
{"title":"The Diagnostic Yield of Genomic Sequencing-Based Genetic Kidney Disease Testing in Kidney Transplant Candidates: Experience at an Urban US Transplant Center.","authors":"Fadee Abu Al Rub, Rengin Elsurer Afsar, Vidya A Fleetwood, Bahar Bastani, Henry Randall, Mustafa Nazzal, Chintalapati Varma, Baris Afsar, Holly Jackson, Shannon Yount, Cody Wooley, Jennifer Light, Virginia Davis, Yasar Caliskan, Krista L Lentine","doi":"10.1097/TP.0000000000005288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent studies suggest that approximately 10% of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have disease-causing genetic variants, an observation relevant to evaluation of kidney transplant candidates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively investigated the diagnostic yield of genetic testing in kidney transplant candidates evaluated at our program (January 1, 2021-December 8, 2022). Inclusion criteria were as follows: first-degree relative(s) with CKD/end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), early-onset CKD, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, cystic kidney disease, alternative complement pathway-associated diseases, or ESKD of unknown cause.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred eleven patients underwent genetic kidney disease testing. The most common indication for testing was early-onset CKD (34.2%), followed by a family history of CKD (23.4%), focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (18.0%), cystic kidney disease (9.0%), alternative complement pathway diseases (3.6%), and ESKD of unknown cause (11.7%). Overall diagnostic yield was 46.9% (52/111), and yield was highest among candidates with a family history of CKD (61.5%; 16/26). Among cases with positive testing, the most common diagnostic variant was APOL1, with 2 renal risk variants identified in 57.7% (30/52), while monogenic causes of CKD were identified in 42.3% (22/52). Genetic testing led to further evaluation or to a different diagnosis than the initial clinical diagnosis in 8.1% (9/111) of the cohort. For 24 transplant candidates, their identified diagnostic variants indicated the need for genetic testing of related living donor candidates; of these, 6 living donor candidates were evaluated and underwent testing, of whom donation was excluded in 1 candidate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pretransplant genetic testing increases understanding of CKD cause, and provides information for living donor evaluation and risk assessment of posttransplant disease recurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":23316,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000005288","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Recent studies suggest that approximately 10% of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have disease-causing genetic variants, an observation relevant to evaluation of kidney transplant candidates.
Methods: We retrospectively investigated the diagnostic yield of genetic testing in kidney transplant candidates evaluated at our program (January 1, 2021-December 8, 2022). Inclusion criteria were as follows: first-degree relative(s) with CKD/end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), early-onset CKD, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, cystic kidney disease, alternative complement pathway-associated diseases, or ESKD of unknown cause.
Results: One hundred eleven patients underwent genetic kidney disease testing. The most common indication for testing was early-onset CKD (34.2%), followed by a family history of CKD (23.4%), focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (18.0%), cystic kidney disease (9.0%), alternative complement pathway diseases (3.6%), and ESKD of unknown cause (11.7%). Overall diagnostic yield was 46.9% (52/111), and yield was highest among candidates with a family history of CKD (61.5%; 16/26). Among cases with positive testing, the most common diagnostic variant was APOL1, with 2 renal risk variants identified in 57.7% (30/52), while monogenic causes of CKD were identified in 42.3% (22/52). Genetic testing led to further evaluation or to a different diagnosis than the initial clinical diagnosis in 8.1% (9/111) of the cohort. For 24 transplant candidates, their identified diagnostic variants indicated the need for genetic testing of related living donor candidates; of these, 6 living donor candidates were evaluated and underwent testing, of whom donation was excluded in 1 candidate.
Conclusions: Pretransplant genetic testing increases understanding of CKD cause, and provides information for living donor evaluation and risk assessment of posttransplant disease recurrence.
期刊介绍:
The official journal of The Transplantation Society, and the International Liver Transplantation Society, Transplantation is published monthly and is the most cited and influential journal in the field, with more than 25,000 citations per year.
Transplantation has been the trusted source for extensive and timely coverage of the most important advances in transplantation for over 50 years. The Editors and Editorial Board are an international group of research and clinical leaders that includes many pioneers of the field, representing a diverse range of areas of expertise. This capable editorial team provides thoughtful and thorough peer review, and delivers rapid, careful and insightful editorial evaluation of all manuscripts submitted to the journal.
Transplantation is committed to rapid review and publication. The journal remains competitive with a time to first decision of fewer than 21 days. Transplantation was the first in the field to offer CME credit to its peer reviewers for reviews completed.
The journal publishes original research articles in original clinical science and original basic science. Short reports bring attention to research at the forefront of the field. Other areas covered include cell therapy and islet transplantation, immunobiology and genomics, and xenotransplantation.