Pardon my trench: reflections on the uptake of trenchless technologies in the Norwegian water sector.

IF 2.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Water Science and Technology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-17 DOI:10.2166/wst.2024.397
Marius Møller Rokstad, Stian Bruaset, Bjørn Solnes Skaar, Eirik Otnæs Borgen, Franz Tscheikner-Gratl
{"title":"Pardon my trench: reflections on the uptake of trenchless technologies in the Norwegian water sector.","authors":"Marius Møller Rokstad, Stian Bruaset, Bjørn Solnes Skaar, Eirik Otnæs Borgen, Franz Tscheikner-Gratl","doi":"10.2166/wst.2024.397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Trenchless pipe renewal can be a more cost-, time- and environmentally effective alternative to traditional open-cut replacement. It reduces service disruptions for surrounding infrastructures and is often cheaper, especially when extensive excavation works are necessary, particularly in cold climates, like Norway, where trenches are traditionally deep due to frost security requirements. Still, the uptake of trenchless technologies is still limited in the Norwegian market. In this study, interviews were conducted with representative actors in the Norwegian water industry (water utilities, contractors, and consultants), with the aim of revealing how the technology for renewal of pipes is selected in the planning phase and identifying hindering and enabling factors for trenchless technology uptake in the market. Factors identified include market conservativism, lack of trust between stakeholders, missing guidelines about the distribution of risk, lack of knowledge/specialization in utilities and consultant offices, and issues pertaining to the project delivery method and tendering process. These factors indicate which measures could be implemented to increase the uptake of trenchless technologies in the Norwegian and similar markets. Suggested measures include strengthening the position of stakeholder independent trade organization, facilitating cooperation between smaller utilities and adapting the tendering process to better reflect the requirements of the projects.</p>","PeriodicalId":23653,"journal":{"name":"Water Science and Technology","volume":"91 1","pages":"83-92"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2024.397","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Trenchless pipe renewal can be a more cost-, time- and environmentally effective alternative to traditional open-cut replacement. It reduces service disruptions for surrounding infrastructures and is often cheaper, especially when extensive excavation works are necessary, particularly in cold climates, like Norway, where trenches are traditionally deep due to frost security requirements. Still, the uptake of trenchless technologies is still limited in the Norwegian market. In this study, interviews were conducted with representative actors in the Norwegian water industry (water utilities, contractors, and consultants), with the aim of revealing how the technology for renewal of pipes is selected in the planning phase and identifying hindering and enabling factors for trenchless technology uptake in the market. Factors identified include market conservativism, lack of trust between stakeholders, missing guidelines about the distribution of risk, lack of knowledge/specialization in utilities and consultant offices, and issues pertaining to the project delivery method and tendering process. These factors indicate which measures could be implemented to increase the uptake of trenchless technologies in the Norwegian and similar markets. Suggested measures include strengthening the position of stakeholder independent trade organization, facilitating cooperation between smaller utilities and adapting the tendering process to better reflect the requirements of the projects.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
请原谅我的战壕:对挪威水务部门采用非开挖技术的反思。
与传统的裸眼管道替换相比,非开挖管道更新是一种成本更低、更省时、更环保的选择。它减少了对周围基础设施的服务中断,而且通常更便宜,特别是在需要进行大规模挖掘工作的情况下,特别是在寒冷的气候下,如挪威,由于霜冻安全要求,那里的战壕传统上很深。尽管如此,非开挖技术在挪威市场的应用仍然有限。在这项研究中,采访了挪威水务行业的代表(水务公司、承包商和顾问),目的是揭示在规划阶段如何选择管道更新技术,并确定非开挖技术在市场上采用的阻碍和促进因素。确定的因素包括市场保守主义,利益相关者之间缺乏信任,缺乏关于风险分配的指导方针,缺乏公用事业和咨询办公室的知识/专业知识,以及与项目交付方法和招标过程有关的问题。这些因素表明可以采取哪些措施来增加挪威和类似市场对非开挖技术的采用。建议的措施包括加强利益相关者独立贸易组织的地位,促进小型公用事业公司之间的合作,调整招标程序以更好地反映项目的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Water Science and Technology
Water Science and Technology 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.70%
发文量
366
审稿时长
4.4 months
期刊介绍: Water Science and Technology publishes peer-reviewed papers on all aspects of the science and technology of water and wastewater. Papers are selected by a rigorous peer review procedure with the aim of rapid and wide dissemination of research results, development and application of new techniques, and related managerial and policy issues. Scientists, engineers, consultants, managers and policy-makers will find this journal essential as a permanent record of progress of research activities and their practical applications.
期刊最新文献
CFD simulation of turbulent mass transfer of H2S and O2 in a stirring tank. Degradation of aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbon mixture by a Rhodococcus sp. Effects of magnetotactic bacteria (MTB) on membrane fouling control in an ultrafiltration treatment of chromium-containing surface water. Nuclear power plant waste heat opens a window of next-generation desalination hybridization: a SOAR-based review. Pardon my trench: reflections on the uptake of trenchless technologies in the Norwegian water sector.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1