Correlation on metabolic complete response on positron emission tomography and pathological complete response in patients with breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Lorraine Wai Yan Ma, Polly Suk Yee Cheung, Chi Lai Ho, Yuet Hung Wong, Wing Pan Luk, Ling Hiu Fung
{"title":"Correlation on metabolic complete response on positron emission tomography and pathological complete response in patients with breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.","authors":"Lorraine Wai Yan Ma, Polly Suk Yee Cheung, Chi Lai Ho, Yuet Hung Wong, Wing Pan Luk, Ling Hiu Fung","doi":"10.1002/wjs.12454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in treating breast cancer has expanded in recent years. There was increased interest in using positron emission tomography (PET) for the evaluation of treatment response. We aimed to study the accuracy of metabolic complete response (mCR) on PET scan in predicting pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Between January 1, 2014 and June 30, 2019, 356 consecutive patients who completed neoadjuvant treatment underwent PET scan before surgery. 207 patients (58.1%) achieved mCR and 128 patients (36.0%) achieved pathologic CR. Among mCR patients, 101 (48.8%) had pCR. Among pCR patients, 27 (21%) did not achieve mCR on PET. The overall sensitivity of predicting pCR with mCR was 78.9% and specificity of 53.5%. The overall accuracy was 0.691 by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Analysis using mCR to predict breast/axilla pCR had a sensitivity of 76.2%/67.9%, specificity of 54%/62.1%, and AUC of 0.682/0.675, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity were highest among HR-/HER2+ (87.1% and 57.1%), followed by HR+/HER2- (85% and 59.6%) and triple negative (82.1% and 54.1%) and the lowest were HR+/HER2+ (triple positive) (69.4% and 40.3%). There was little difference in sensitivity and specificity among the high and low Ki67 proliferation index (78.3% vs. 75% and 52.1% vs. 62.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PET was useful in evaluation of tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy especially in the HR-HER2+ subtype. However, its accuracy was not high enough to replace surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12454","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in treating breast cancer has expanded in recent years. There was increased interest in using positron emission tomography (PET) for the evaluation of treatment response. We aimed to study the accuracy of metabolic complete response (mCR) on PET scan in predicting pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant treatment.
Methods and results: Between January 1, 2014 and June 30, 2019, 356 consecutive patients who completed neoadjuvant treatment underwent PET scan before surgery. 207 patients (58.1%) achieved mCR and 128 patients (36.0%) achieved pathologic CR. Among mCR patients, 101 (48.8%) had pCR. Among pCR patients, 27 (21%) did not achieve mCR on PET. The overall sensitivity of predicting pCR with mCR was 78.9% and specificity of 53.5%. The overall accuracy was 0.691 by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Analysis using mCR to predict breast/axilla pCR had a sensitivity of 76.2%/67.9%, specificity of 54%/62.1%, and AUC of 0.682/0.675, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity were highest among HR-/HER2+ (87.1% and 57.1%), followed by HR+/HER2- (85% and 59.6%) and triple negative (82.1% and 54.1%) and the lowest were HR+/HER2+ (triple positive) (69.4% and 40.3%). There was little difference in sensitivity and specificity among the high and low Ki67 proliferation index (78.3% vs. 75% and 52.1% vs. 62.5%).
Conclusion: PET was useful in evaluation of tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy especially in the HR-HER2+ subtype. However, its accuracy was not high enough to replace surgery.
目的:近年来,新辅助化疗在乳腺癌治疗中的应用越来越广泛。人们对使用正电子发射断层扫描(PET)来评估治疗反应越来越感兴趣。我们旨在研究PET扫描代谢完全缓解(mCR)预测新辅助治疗后病理完全缓解(pCR)的准确性。方法和结果:2014年1月1日至2019年6月30日期间,356例连续完成新辅助治疗的患者在手术前进行了PET扫描。达到mCR者207例(58.1%),达到病理CR者128例(36.0%),mCR者101例(48.8%)有pCR。在pCR患者中,27例(21%)PET未达到mCR。mCR预测pCR的总体敏感性为78.9%,特异性为53.5%。以受试者工作特征曲线(AUC)下面积计算,总准确度为0.691。mCR预测乳腺/腋窝pCR的敏感性为76.2%/67.9%,特异性为54%/62.1%,AUC为0.682/0.675。HR-/HER2+的敏感性和特异性最高(87.1%和57.1%),其次是HR+/HER2-(85%和59.6%)和三阴性(82.1%和54.1%),HR+/HER2+(三阳性)的敏感性和特异性最低(69.4%和40.3%)。Ki67增殖指数高低的敏感性和特异性差异不大(78.3% vs. 75%, 52.1% vs. 62.5%)。结论:PET可用于评价肿瘤对新辅助化疗的反应,尤其是HR-HER2+亚型。然而,它的准确性还不足以取代手术。
期刊介绍:
World Journal of Surgery is the official publication of the International Society of Surgery/Societe Internationale de Chirurgie (iss-sic.com). Under the editorship of Dr. Julie Ann Sosa, World Journal of Surgery provides an in-depth, international forum for the most authoritative information on major clinical problems in the fields of clinical and experimental surgery, surgical education, and socioeconomic aspects of surgical care. Contributions are reviewed and selected by a group of distinguished surgeons from across the world who make up the Editorial Board.