Appropriate tourniquet use in surgery: A literature review.

Darcy Fay, Tayla Fay, Wayne Hoskins, Roger Bingham
{"title":"Appropriate tourniquet use in surgery: A literature review.","authors":"Darcy Fay, Tayla Fay, Wayne Hoskins, Roger Bingham","doi":"10.1177/17504589241309534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tourniquet use is ubiquitous in the operating theatre. However, optimal tourniquet usage is unclear, including type, pressure, inflation time, or whether a tourniquet should be used at all. This study reports a literature review of tourniquet use, comparing type, pressure, duration, effectiveness, and the spectrum of complications in an adult surgical population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data regarding population size, surgery performed, tourniquet type, tourniquet location, total tourniquet inflation time, timing of inflation and deflation, pressure, and complications were recorded. Postoperative tourniquet-related pain was the commonest adverse event. Other complications included venous thromboembolism, wound healing issues, neuropathy, and abrasions. Findings suggest that most surgeons use standardised pressures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tourniquets are associated with a spectrum of complications. It is unclear whether tourniquet use provides better surgical outcomes. If tourniquets are used, surgeons should minimise the application pressure and duration. This may be achieved through a patient-centred approach and careful use of padding.</p>","PeriodicalId":35481,"journal":{"name":"Journal of perioperative practice","volume":" ","pages":"17504589241309534"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of perioperative practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17504589241309534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tourniquet use is ubiquitous in the operating theatre. However, optimal tourniquet usage is unclear, including type, pressure, inflation time, or whether a tourniquet should be used at all. This study reports a literature review of tourniquet use, comparing type, pressure, duration, effectiveness, and the spectrum of complications in an adult surgical population.

Results: Data regarding population size, surgery performed, tourniquet type, tourniquet location, total tourniquet inflation time, timing of inflation and deflation, pressure, and complications were recorded. Postoperative tourniquet-related pain was the commonest adverse event. Other complications included venous thromboembolism, wound healing issues, neuropathy, and abrasions. Findings suggest that most surgeons use standardised pressures.

Conclusion: Tourniquets are associated with a spectrum of complications. It is unclear whether tourniquet use provides better surgical outcomes. If tourniquets are used, surgeons should minimise the application pressure and duration. This may be achieved through a patient-centred approach and careful use of padding.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外科手术中合理使用止血带:文献综述。
背景:止血带的使用在手术室是普遍存在的。然而,止血带的最佳用法尚不清楚,包括类型、压力、充气时间,或者是否应该使用止血带。本研究报告了一篇关于止血带使用的文献综述,比较了成人手术人群中止血带的类型、压力、持续时间、有效性和并发症的谱。结果:记录了人群规模、手术情况、止血带类型、止血带位置、止血带总充气时间、充气和放气时间、压力和并发症等数据。术后止血带相关疼痛是最常见的不良事件。其他并发症包括静脉血栓栓塞、伤口愈合问题、神经病变和擦伤。研究结果表明,大多数外科医生使用标准化压力。结论:止血带与一系列并发症有关。目前尚不清楚使用止血带是否能提供更好的手术效果。如果使用止血带,外科医生应尽量减少施加压力和持续时间。这可以通过以患者为中心的方法和仔细使用填充物来实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of perioperative practice
Journal of perioperative practice Nursing-Medical and Surgical Nursing
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perioperative Practice (JPP) is the official journal of the Association for Perioperative Practice (AfPP). It is an international, peer reviewed journal with a multidisciplinary ethos across all aspects of perioperative care. The overall aim of the journal is to improve patient safety through informing and developing practice. It is an informative professional journal which provides current evidence-based practice, clinical, management and educational developments for practitioners working in the perioperative environment. The journal promotes perioperative practice by publishing clinical research-based articles, literature reviews, topical discussions, advice on clinical issues, current news items and product information.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of intrathecal fentanyl as an adjunct in spinal anaesthesia to ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block as an effective postoperative analgesia for Caesarean section surgery. Exploration of attitudes towards research: Operating department practitioners and theatre nurses. What are the lived career experiences of senior operating department practitioners? An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Association of polypharmacy and perioperative outcomes: Systematic review and meta-analysis. A survey on factors distracting operating theatre staff during surgery in Korea.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1