Ummayhany Bharmal MBBS , Misa Hayasaka MD , George Saade MD , Tetsuya Kawakita MD, MS
{"title":"Association between the dietary inflammatory index and adverse pregnancy outcomes","authors":"Ummayhany Bharmal MBBS , Misa Hayasaka MD , George Saade MD , Tetsuya Kawakita MD, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Limited research exists on the association between preconception pro-inflammatory diets and adverse pregnancy outcomes, and this relationship remains poorly understood.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate the association between preconception dietary inflammatory potential, as measured by the dietary inflammatory index (DII), and adverse pregnancy outcomes in nulliparous individuals.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a secondary analysis of the data from the Nulliparous Outcomes Study: Mothers-to-be (nuMoM2b). Preconception dietary habits, assessed via food frequency questionnaires, were used to calculate DII scores based on 29 pro- and anti-inflammatory food items. Participants were categorized into DII quartiles (Q1–Q4), with Q1 representing the most anti-inflammatory and Q4 the most pro-inflammatory diets. The primary outcome was a composite of adverse pregnancy outcomes, including preterm birth, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, or eclampsia), small for gestational age (<5th percentile), and stillbirth. Secondary outcomes included the individual components of the primary outcome and gestational diabetes. Adjusted relative risks (aRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using modified Poisson regression, controlling for confounders.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 7994 participants included, 1829 (22.8%) experienced the primary outcome. Participants in Q4 had a significantly higher risk of the primary outcome compared to Q1 (25.9% vs 22.1%; aRR 1.15, 95% CI 1.03–1.28) and a notably increased risk of stillbirth (0.9% vs 0.3%; aRR 2.68, 95% CI 1.01–7.07). No significant associations were found for Q2 or Q3 compared to Q1 for the primary outcome (aRR 1.02, 95% CI 0.91–1.14; aRR 0.97, 95% CI 0.86–1.09, respectively). Other secondary outcomes were not statistically significant. Among individual food items, only folic acid was associated with a reduced risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes (aRR 0.97, 95% CI 0.94–0.99).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A pro-inflammatory preconception diet was associated with an increased risk of composite adverse pregnancy outcomes, particularly stillbirth, among nulliparous individuals. These findings underscore the potential role of dietary interventions during the preconception period to mitigate these risks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36186,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","volume":"7 3","pages":"Article 101609"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589933325000102","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Limited research exists on the association between preconception pro-inflammatory diets and adverse pregnancy outcomes, and this relationship remains poorly understood.
Objective
To investigate the association between preconception dietary inflammatory potential, as measured by the dietary inflammatory index (DII), and adverse pregnancy outcomes in nulliparous individuals.
Methods
This was a secondary analysis of the data from the Nulliparous Outcomes Study: Mothers-to-be (nuMoM2b). Preconception dietary habits, assessed via food frequency questionnaires, were used to calculate DII scores based on 29 pro- and anti-inflammatory food items. Participants were categorized into DII quartiles (Q1–Q4), with Q1 representing the most anti-inflammatory and Q4 the most pro-inflammatory diets. The primary outcome was a composite of adverse pregnancy outcomes, including preterm birth, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, or eclampsia), small for gestational age (<5th percentile), and stillbirth. Secondary outcomes included the individual components of the primary outcome and gestational diabetes. Adjusted relative risks (aRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using modified Poisson regression, controlling for confounders.
Results
Among the 7994 participants included, 1829 (22.8%) experienced the primary outcome. Participants in Q4 had a significantly higher risk of the primary outcome compared to Q1 (25.9% vs 22.1%; aRR 1.15, 95% CI 1.03–1.28) and a notably increased risk of stillbirth (0.9% vs 0.3%; aRR 2.68, 95% CI 1.01–7.07). No significant associations were found for Q2 or Q3 compared to Q1 for the primary outcome (aRR 1.02, 95% CI 0.91–1.14; aRR 0.97, 95% CI 0.86–1.09, respectively). Other secondary outcomes were not statistically significant. Among individual food items, only folic acid was associated with a reduced risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes (aRR 0.97, 95% CI 0.94–0.99).
Conclusion
A pro-inflammatory preconception diet was associated with an increased risk of composite adverse pregnancy outcomes, particularly stillbirth, among nulliparous individuals. These findings underscore the potential role of dietary interventions during the preconception period to mitigate these risks.
背景:关于孕前促炎饮食与不良妊娠结局之间关系的研究有限,这种关系仍然知之甚少。目的:通过饮食炎症指数(DII)测量未产个体的孕前饮食炎症潜能与不良妊娠结局之间的关系。方法:这是对准妈妈(nuMoM2b)无产结局研究数据的二次分析。孕前饮食习惯,通过食物频率问卷评估,用于计算基于29种促炎和抗炎食物的DII分数。参与者被分为DII四分位数(Q1-Q4), Q1代表最抗炎的饮食,Q4代表最促炎的饮食。主要结局是不良妊娠结局的综合,包括早产、妊娠高血压疾病(先兆子痫、妊娠高血压或子痫)、胎龄小(结果:在纳入的7,994名参与者中,1,829名(22.8%)经历了主要结局。与Q1相比,Q4的参与者出现主要结局的风险明显更高(25.9% vs 22.1%;aRR 1.15, 95% CI 1.03-1.28),死产风险显著增加(0.9% vs. 0.3%;aRR 2.68, 95% CI 1.01-7.07)。与主要结局Q1相比,Q2或Q3未发现显著相关性(aRR 1.02, 95% CI 0.91-1.14;aRR 0.97, 95% CI 0.86-1.09)。其他次要结局无统计学意义。在个别食品中,只有叶酸与降低不良妊娠结局的风险相关(aRR 0.97, 95% CI 0.94-0.99)。结论:在未生育的个体中,促炎的孕前饮食与复合不良妊娠结局的风险增加有关,特别是死胎。这些发现强调了孕前饮食干预在减轻这些风险方面的潜在作用。
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG) is a highly esteemed publication with two companion titles. One of these is the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Maternal-Fetal Medicine (AJOG MFM), which is dedicated to the latest research in the field of maternal-fetal medicine, specifically concerning high-risk pregnancies. The journal encompasses a wide range of topics, including:
Maternal Complications: It addresses significant studies that have the potential to change clinical practice regarding complications faced by pregnant women.
Fetal Complications: The journal covers prenatal diagnosis, ultrasound, and genetic issues related to the fetus, providing insights into the management and care of fetal health.
Prenatal Care: It discusses the best practices in prenatal care to ensure the health and well-being of both the mother and the unborn child.
Intrapartum Care: It provides guidance on the care provided during the childbirth process, which is critical for the safety of both mother and baby.
Postpartum Issues: The journal also tackles issues that arise after childbirth, focusing on the postpartum period and its implications for maternal health. AJOG MFM serves as a reliable forum for peer-reviewed research, with a preference for randomized trials and meta-analyses. The goal is to equip researchers and clinicians with the most current information and evidence-based strategies to effectively manage high-risk pregnancies and to provide the best possible care for mothers and their unborn children.