Association of Albumin-To-Creatinine Ratio With Diabetic Retinopathy Among US Adults (NHANES 2009-2016).

IF 2.7 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1002/edm2.70029
Han Dai, Ling Liu, Weiwei Xu
{"title":"Association of Albumin-To-Creatinine Ratio With Diabetic Retinopathy Among US Adults (NHANES 2009-2016).","authors":"Han Dai, Ling Liu, Weiwei Xu","doi":"10.1002/edm2.70029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigates the relationship between the albumin-to-creatinine ratio and diabetic retinopathy (DR) in US adults using NHANES data from 2009 to 2016. This study assesses the predictive efficacy of the urinary serum albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR/SACR Ratio) against traditional biomarkers such as the serum albumin-to-creatinine ratio (SACR) and urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) for evaluating DR risk. Additionally, the study explores the potential of these biomarkers, both individually and in combination with HbA1c, for early detection and risk stratification of DR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study analysed data from 2594 diabetic adults in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES 2009-2016). Multivariate logistic regression models, adjusted for demographic (sex, age, race and education) and clinical factors (WBC, PLT, RDW, HbA1c, HBP and CHD), examined the associations between biomarkers and DR. Biomarkers were analysed both continuously and in quartiles to assess dose-response relationships. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis evaluated the predictive accuracy of individual biomarkers and combined models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Elevated SACR levels were inversely related to DR risk, while UACR showed a positive correlation. The UACR/SACR ratio demonstrated superior predictive capability for DR compared to SACR and UACR alone. The most accurate predictive model combined SACR, UACR, UACR/SACR ratio and HbA1c (AUC = 0.614), highlighting DR development complexity. Subgroup analyses revealed stronger associations in participants aged < 60 years and those with hypertension (both p < 0.05), with more pronounced effects observed in males and Mexican Americans, while lifestyle factors showed no significant modifying effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The UACR/SACR Ratio emerged as a potentially superior DR predictor, particularly in younger patients and those with hypertension, suggesting its utility in enhancing early detection and risk stratification. Comprehensive evaluation of renal function and glycaemic control biomarkers, considering age- and comorbidity-specific patterns, could improve DR risk prediction and management. Future longitudinal studies should validate these findings, particularly in identified high-risk subgroups, and investigate underlying mechanisms, potentially advancing personalised DR prediction and management strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":36522,"journal":{"name":"Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism","volume":"8 1","pages":"e70029"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11742259/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edm2.70029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study investigates the relationship between the albumin-to-creatinine ratio and diabetic retinopathy (DR) in US adults using NHANES data from 2009 to 2016. This study assesses the predictive efficacy of the urinary serum albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR/SACR Ratio) against traditional biomarkers such as the serum albumin-to-creatinine ratio (SACR) and urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) for evaluating DR risk. Additionally, the study explores the potential of these biomarkers, both individually and in combination with HbA1c, for early detection and risk stratification of DR.

Methods: This cross-sectional study analysed data from 2594 diabetic adults in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES 2009-2016). Multivariate logistic regression models, adjusted for demographic (sex, age, race and education) and clinical factors (WBC, PLT, RDW, HbA1c, HBP and CHD), examined the associations between biomarkers and DR. Biomarkers were analysed both continuously and in quartiles to assess dose-response relationships. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis evaluated the predictive accuracy of individual biomarkers and combined models.

Results: Elevated SACR levels were inversely related to DR risk, while UACR showed a positive correlation. The UACR/SACR ratio demonstrated superior predictive capability for DR compared to SACR and UACR alone. The most accurate predictive model combined SACR, UACR, UACR/SACR ratio and HbA1c (AUC = 0.614), highlighting DR development complexity. Subgroup analyses revealed stronger associations in participants aged < 60 years and those with hypertension (both p < 0.05), with more pronounced effects observed in males and Mexican Americans, while lifestyle factors showed no significant modifying effect.

Conclusion: The UACR/SACR Ratio emerged as a potentially superior DR predictor, particularly in younger patients and those with hypertension, suggesting its utility in enhancing early detection and risk stratification. Comprehensive evaluation of renal function and glycaemic control biomarkers, considering age- and comorbidity-specific patterns, could improve DR risk prediction and management. Future longitudinal studies should validate these findings, particularly in identified high-risk subgroups, and investigate underlying mechanisms, potentially advancing personalised DR prediction and management strategies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国成人中白蛋白与肌酐比值与糖尿病视网膜病变的关系(NHANES 2009-2016)。
目的:本研究利用2009年至2016年的NHANES数据,调查美国成年人白蛋白与肌酐比值与糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)的关系。本研究评估了尿白蛋白与肌酐比值(UACR/SACR ratio)与传统生物标志物(如血清白蛋白与肌酐比值(SACR)和尿白蛋白与肌酐比值(UACR))在评估DR风险方面的预测效果。此外,该研究还探讨了这些生物标志物(单独使用或与HbA1c联合使用)在dr早期检测和风险分层中的潜力。方法:该横断面研究分析了全国健康与营养检查调查(NHANES 2009-2016)中2594名糖尿病成年人的数据。调整了人口统计学(性别、年龄、种族和教育程度)和临床因素(WBC、PLT、RDW、HbA1c、HBP和CHD)的多变量logistic回归模型检验了生物标志物和dr之间的关联。生物标志物进行了连续分析和四分位数分析,以评估剂量-反应关系。受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析评估了单个生物标志物和组合模型的预测准确性。结果:SACR水平升高与DR风险呈负相关,UACR水平升高与DR风险呈正相关。与单独的SACR和UACR相比,UACR/SACR比值对DR的预测能力更强。最准确的预测模型结合了SACR、UACR、UACR/SACR比值和糖化血红蛋白(AUC = 0.614),突出了DR发展的复杂性。结论:UACR/SACR比值是潜在的更好的DR预测指标,特别是在年轻患者和高血压患者中,表明其在加强早期发现和风险分层方面的效用。综合评估肾功能和血糖控制生物标志物,考虑年龄和合并症特异性模式,可以改善DR风险预测和管理。未来的纵向研究应该验证这些发现,特别是在确定的高风险亚群中,并调查潜在的机制,潜在地推进个性化的DR预测和管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Predicting Time in Range Without Hypoglycaemia Using a Risk Calculator for Intermittently Scanned CGM in Type 1 Diabetes. Reduction of Hepatic Fat Content by Dulaglutide for the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus: A Two-Centre Open, Single-Arm Trial. Blood Cells Parameters in Second Trimester of Pregnancy and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Diagnosis Osteoporosis Risk: Using Machine Learning Algorithms Among Fasa Adults Cohort Study (FACS). Interventions for Type 2 Diabetes Prevention and Management Among Indigenous Children and Youth: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1