ABO isoagglutinin titers in group "O" blood donors.

IF 0.6 Q4 HEMATOLOGY Asian Journal of Transfusion Science Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-23 DOI:10.4103/ajts.ajts_68_24
Sadhana Mangwana, Shashi Kumar, Vivek Gangwar
{"title":"ABO isoagglutinin titers in group \"O\" blood donors.","authors":"Sadhana Mangwana, Shashi Kumar, Vivek Gangwar","doi":"10.4103/ajts.ajts_68_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High titers of anti-A and anti-B are considered to be one reason for hemolytic transfusion reactions and ABO hemolytic disease in fetus and neonates. There is no consensus for critical ABO antibody titers to guide transfusion or transplant decisions. Implementation of ABO titer measurement can favor reduction in transfusion reactions in nongroup \"O\" recipients.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to understand the trend and quantification of anti-A and anti-B antibody titers in Group \"O\" donors in this geography.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>A prospective study was conducted in 218, Group \"O\" blood donors in the year 2021, during the COVID-19 pandemic. Immunoglobulin (Ig) M antibody titers were measured by hemagglutination and IgG titers by solid-phase red cell adherence. Antibody titers ≥128 for IgG and ≥64 for IgM were considered \"high titers.\" Epi Info 7.1 software was used for statistical analysis, with <i>P</i> < 0.05 significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 96.75% of blood donors were male with a median age of 33.16 ± 8.8 years. ABO antibody titers ranged from 0 to 1024. The prevalence of titers of <128 for IgG anti-A and anti-B was 79.36% and 86.24%, respectively, and 88.53% for both anti-A and anti-B IgM (<64). High IgG anti-A antibody titers were exhibited in 20.64% and anti-B titers in 13.76% of donors. None of the recipients showed any hemolytic reactions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The donor population showed predominance of low isoagglutinin titers. Defining critical titers will help formulate institutional guidelines on ABO-incompatible platelet transfusions and transplants. The use of automation in ABO titer assays removes interobserver variations and offers precise, reproducible, and less labor-intensive assays in resource-constrained settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":42296,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Transfusion Science","volume":"18 2","pages":"208-213"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11734798/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Transfusion Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ajts.ajts_68_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: High titers of anti-A and anti-B are considered to be one reason for hemolytic transfusion reactions and ABO hemolytic disease in fetus and neonates. There is no consensus for critical ABO antibody titers to guide transfusion or transplant decisions. Implementation of ABO titer measurement can favor reduction in transfusion reactions in nongroup "O" recipients.

Aims: This study aimed to understand the trend and quantification of anti-A and anti-B antibody titers in Group "O" donors in this geography.

Subjects and methods: A prospective study was conducted in 218, Group "O" blood donors in the year 2021, during the COVID-19 pandemic. Immunoglobulin (Ig) M antibody titers were measured by hemagglutination and IgG titers by solid-phase red cell adherence. Antibody titers ≥128 for IgG and ≥64 for IgM were considered "high titers." Epi Info 7.1 software was used for statistical analysis, with P < 0.05 significant.

Results: About 96.75% of blood donors were male with a median age of 33.16 ± 8.8 years. ABO antibody titers ranged from 0 to 1024. The prevalence of titers of <128 for IgG anti-A and anti-B was 79.36% and 86.24%, respectively, and 88.53% for both anti-A and anti-B IgM (<64). High IgG anti-A antibody titers were exhibited in 20.64% and anti-B titers in 13.76% of donors. None of the recipients showed any hemolytic reactions.

Conclusions: The donor population showed predominance of low isoagglutinin titers. Defining critical titers will help formulate institutional guidelines on ABO-incompatible platelet transfusions and transplants. The use of automation in ABO titer assays removes interobserver variations and offers precise, reproducible, and less labor-intensive assays in resource-constrained settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
O型献血者ABO异凝集素滴度。
背景:高滴度的抗a和抗b被认为是胎儿和新生儿发生溶血性输血反应和ABO溶血性疾病的原因之一。对于ABO抗体的关键滴度来指导输血或移植决策尚无共识。实施ABO滴度测定有利于减少非O型受体的输血反应。目的:本研究旨在了解该地区“O”组献血者抗a和抗b抗体滴度的趋势和定量。对象和方法:在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,对2021年218名“O”组献血者进行了前瞻性研究。用血凝法测定免疫球蛋白(Ig) M抗体滴度,用固相红细胞粘附法测定IgG滴度。IgG抗体滴度≥128,IgM抗体滴度≥64被认为是“高滴度”。采用Epi Info 7.1软件进行统计学分析,差异有P < 0.05意义。结果:献血者中男性占96.75%,中位年龄33.16±8.8岁。ABO抗体滴度从0到1024不等。结论:供体人群以低异凝集素滴度为主。确定临界滴度将有助于制定abo血型不相容血小板输注和移植的制度指南。在ABO滴度测定中使用自动化消除了观察者之间的差异,并在资源有限的情况下提供精确、可重复和较少劳动密集型的测定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
44 weeks
期刊最新文献
Serial intrauterine transfusion for severe fetal anemia due to anti-M alloimmunization. Pilot study to understand and compare challenges being faced in reporting of transfusion reactions in various types of blood banks enrolled under Haemovigilance Programme of India. Safety and efficacy of therapeutic plasma exchange in neuromyelitis optica: A retrospective study from South India. Serological comparison of weak D versus weakly reacting D by four different methods. Smart approaches for encouraging the blood donation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1