Evaluation of a modified venous excess ultrasound (VExUS) protocol for estimation of venous congestion: a cohort study.

IF 3.4 Q2 Medicine Ultrasound Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1186/s13089-025-00411-x
Katharine C Martin, Edward A Gill, Ivor J Douglas, August A Longino
{"title":"Evaluation of a modified venous excess ultrasound (VExUS) protocol for estimation of venous congestion: a cohort study.","authors":"Katharine C Martin, Edward A Gill, Ivor J Douglas, August A Longino","doi":"10.1186/s13089-025-00411-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding venous congestion is critical to the management of many illnesses, but assessing volume status can be challenging. The current gold standard for volume status assessment of right heart catheterization (RHC) is invasive, costly, and often unavailable. Venous Excess Ultrasound Score (VExUS) is a novel ultrasound protocol for to assessment of venous congestion using the inferior vena cava, hepatic, portal and renal veins. Though there is a much interest in the technique, the renal component of the exam is challenging to acquire. For this reason we aimed to see if a modified VExUS (mVExUS) excluding the kidney component performs similarly to traditional VExUS (tVExUS) for detecting elevated right atrial pressure (RAP) as measured by RHC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A consecutive cohort of 95 patients undergoing RHC had VExUS exams before the procedure. Researchers compared the performance of tVExUS, mVExUS, and inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter in predicting RAP > 12 mmHg.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The area under the curve (AUC) for detecting elevated RAP was similar for tVExUS (0.87) and mVExUS (0.85). Both methods achieved high sensitivity and specificity. Agreement between tVExUS and mVExUS scores was near-perfect (Cohen's Kappa = 0.85).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>mVExUS may be as effective as tVExUS in identifying elevated RAP. This abbreviated version could improve efficiency and adoption of VExUS for assessing venous congestion. Further studies are needed in diverse patient populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":36911,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound Journal","volume":"17 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11748731/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-025-00411-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Understanding venous congestion is critical to the management of many illnesses, but assessing volume status can be challenging. The current gold standard for volume status assessment of right heart catheterization (RHC) is invasive, costly, and often unavailable. Venous Excess Ultrasound Score (VExUS) is a novel ultrasound protocol for to assessment of venous congestion using the inferior vena cava, hepatic, portal and renal veins. Though there is a much interest in the technique, the renal component of the exam is challenging to acquire. For this reason we aimed to see if a modified VExUS (mVExUS) excluding the kidney component performs similarly to traditional VExUS (tVExUS) for detecting elevated right atrial pressure (RAP) as measured by RHC.

Methods: A consecutive cohort of 95 patients undergoing RHC had VExUS exams before the procedure. Researchers compared the performance of tVExUS, mVExUS, and inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter in predicting RAP > 12 mmHg.

Results: The area under the curve (AUC) for detecting elevated RAP was similar for tVExUS (0.87) and mVExUS (0.85). Both methods achieved high sensitivity and specificity. Agreement between tVExUS and mVExUS scores was near-perfect (Cohen's Kappa = 0.85).

Conclusion: mVExUS may be as effective as tVExUS in identifying elevated RAP. This abbreviated version could improve efficiency and adoption of VExUS for assessing venous congestion. Further studies are needed in diverse patient populations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评价改进的静脉过量超声(VExUS)方案估计静脉充血:一项队列研究。
背景:了解静脉充血对许多疾病的治疗至关重要,但评估容量状态可能具有挑战性。目前右心导管(RHC)容量状态评估的金标准是有创的,昂贵的,而且经常不可用。静脉充血超声评分(VExUS)是一种用于评估下腔静脉、肝静脉、门静脉和肾静脉充血的新型超声方案。尽管人们对这项技术很感兴趣,但肾脏检查的内容很难掌握。因此,我们的目的是观察不含肾脏成分的改良型VExUS (mVExUS)是否与传统的VExUS (tVExUS)在检测由RHC测量的右心房压(RAP)升高方面表现相似。方法:连续95例接受RHC的患者在手术前进行了VExUS检查。研究人员比较了tVExUS、mVExUS和下腔静脉(IVC)直径在预测RAP bbb12mmhg方面的性能。结果:tVExUS和mVExUS检测RAP升高的曲线下面积(AUC)相近,分别为0.87和0.85。两种方法均具有较高的灵敏度和特异性。tVExUS和mVExUS评分之间的一致性近乎完美(Cohen’s Kappa = 0.85)。结论:mVExUS可能与tVExUS一样有效识别RAP升高。该简化版本可提高VExUS评估静脉充血的效率和采用率。需要在不同的患者群体中进行进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ultrasound Journal
Ultrasound Journal Health Professions-Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
45
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Quantitative valve motion assessment in adolescents using point-of-care ultrasound: short communication. A framework for flow time measured by Doppler ultrasound. Exploring the adoption of diaphragm and lung ultrasound (DLUS) by physiotherapists, physical therapists, and respiratory therapists: an updated scoping review. Comparison of two point-of-care lung ultrasound techniques and their associated outcomes for bronchiolitis in the pediatric emergency department. Evaluation of a modified venous excess ultrasound (VExUS) protocol for estimation of venous congestion: a cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1