Management of traumatic brain injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome-What evidence exists? A scoping review.

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of the Intensive Care Society Pub Date : 2025-01-18 DOI:10.1177/17511437241311398
Margot Kelly-Hedrick, Sunny Liu, Jordan Hatfield, Alexandria L Soto, Alyssa M Bartlett, Helen J Heo, Ellen O'Callaghan, Evangeline Arulraja, Samantha Kaplan, Tetsu Ohnuma, Vijay Krishnamoorthy, Katherine Colton, Jordan Komisarow
{"title":"Management of traumatic brain injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome-What evidence exists? A scoping review.","authors":"Margot Kelly-Hedrick, Sunny Liu, Jordan Hatfield, Alexandria L Soto, Alyssa M Bartlett, Helen J Heo, Ellen O'Callaghan, Evangeline Arulraja, Samantha Kaplan, Tetsu Ohnuma, Vijay Krishnamoorthy, Katherine Colton, Jordan Komisarow","doi":"10.1177/17511437241311398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Up to 20% of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) develop acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which is associated with increased odds of mortality. Guideline-based treatment for ARDS includes \"lung protective\" ventilation strategies, some of which are in opposition to \"brain protective\" strategies used for ventilation with patients with TBI. We conducted a scoping review of ventilation management strategies with clinical outcomes among patients with TBI and ARDS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched three databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science) using a systematic search strategy. We included any studies of patients with TBI and ARDS with ventilation strategies including PEEP, oxygenation, prone positioning, recruitment maneuvers, pulmonary vasodilators (e.g., nitric oxide), high frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV), and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). All clinical outcomes were included. Extracted data included details about sample (age, gender), study design, inclusion/exclusion criteria, intervention details, and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search returned 10,514 articles, 35 of which met final inclusion criteria. Interventions studied included ECMO (<i>n</i> = 13 articles), HFOV (<i>n</i> = 4), PEEP interventions (<i>n</i> = 3), prone positioning (<i>n</i> = 3), vasodilators (<i>n</i> = 4), and other lung recruitment maneuvers (<i>n</i> = 9). No randomized controlled trials were identified; studies were mostly case reports (<i>n</i> = 18/35, 51%) and series (<i>n</i> = 7/35, 20%), with some cohort studies (<i>n</i> = 5/35, 14%) and non-randomized experimental trials (<i>n</i> = 5/35, 14%), all at single institutions. Outcomes included physiologic changes (e.g., change in cerebrodynamics or hemodynamics with intervention) and clinical outcomes such as mortality, complications, or neurologic recovery. Five studies (14%) included pediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In this scoping review of ventilatory strategies for patients with concurrent TBI and ARDS, we found variation in heterogeneity of study design, interventions, and outcomes. Studies were mostly case report/series and observational studies, seriously limiting our ability to draw conclusions about effectiveness of interventions. Targeted areas of further research are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":" ","pages":"17511437241311398"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11742134/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17511437241311398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Up to 20% of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) develop acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which is associated with increased odds of mortality. Guideline-based treatment for ARDS includes "lung protective" ventilation strategies, some of which are in opposition to "brain protective" strategies used for ventilation with patients with TBI. We conducted a scoping review of ventilation management strategies with clinical outcomes among patients with TBI and ARDS.

Methods: We searched three databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science) using a systematic search strategy. We included any studies of patients with TBI and ARDS with ventilation strategies including PEEP, oxygenation, prone positioning, recruitment maneuvers, pulmonary vasodilators (e.g., nitric oxide), high frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV), and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). All clinical outcomes were included. Extracted data included details about sample (age, gender), study design, inclusion/exclusion criteria, intervention details, and outcomes.

Results: The search returned 10,514 articles, 35 of which met final inclusion criteria. Interventions studied included ECMO (n = 13 articles), HFOV (n = 4), PEEP interventions (n = 3), prone positioning (n = 3), vasodilators (n = 4), and other lung recruitment maneuvers (n = 9). No randomized controlled trials were identified; studies were mostly case reports (n = 18/35, 51%) and series (n = 7/35, 20%), with some cohort studies (n = 5/35, 14%) and non-randomized experimental trials (n = 5/35, 14%), all at single institutions. Outcomes included physiologic changes (e.g., change in cerebrodynamics or hemodynamics with intervention) and clinical outcomes such as mortality, complications, or neurologic recovery. Five studies (14%) included pediatric patients.

Discussion: In this scoping review of ventilatory strategies for patients with concurrent TBI and ARDS, we found variation in heterogeneity of study design, interventions, and outcomes. Studies were mostly case report/series and observational studies, seriously limiting our ability to draw conclusions about effectiveness of interventions. Targeted areas of further research are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外伤性脑损伤和急性呼吸窘迫综合征的处理-有什么证据存在?范围审查。
高达20%的创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者出现急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS),这与死亡率增加有关。基于指南的ARDS治疗包括“肺保护”通气策略,其中一些与用于TBI患者通气的“脑保护”策略相反。我们对TBI和ARDS患者的通气管理策略与临床结果进行了范围综述。方法:采用系统的检索策略对MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science三个数据库进行检索。我们纳入了所有TBI和ARDS患者的通气策略,包括PEEP、氧合、俯卧位、复吸动作、肺血管扩张剂(如一氧化氮)、高频振荡通气(HFOV)和体外膜氧合(ECMO)。纳入了所有临床结果。提取的数据包括样本的详细信息(年龄、性别)、研究设计、纳入/排除标准、干预细节和结果。结果:检索返回10,514篇文章,其中35篇符合最终纳入标准。研究的干预措施包括ECMO (n = 13篇)、HFOV (n = 4篇)、PEEP干预(n = 3篇)、俯卧位(n = 3篇)、血管扩张剂(n = 4篇)和其他肺部收缩操作(n = 9篇)。未发现随机对照试验;研究主要是病例报告(n = 18/35, 51%)和系列研究(n = 7/35, 20%),还有一些队列研究(n = 5/35, 14%)和非随机实验试验(n = 5/35, 14%),均在单一机构进行。结果包括生理变化(如干预后脑动力学或血流动力学的变化)和临床结果,如死亡率、并发症或神经系统恢复。5项研究(14%)包括儿科患者。讨论:在对并发TBI和ARDS患者的通气策略的范围综述中,我们发现研究设计、干预措施和结果的异质性存在差异。研究主要是病例报告/系列研究和观察性研究,严重限制了我们得出干预措施有效性结论的能力。讨论了进一步研究的目标领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Intensive Care Society
Journal of the Intensive Care Society Nursing-Critical Care Nursing
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Intensive Care Society (JICS) is an international, peer-reviewed journal that strives to disseminate clinically and scientifically relevant peer-reviewed research, evaluation, experience and opinion to all staff working in the field of intensive care medicine. Our aim is to inform clinicians on the provision of best practice and provide direction for innovative scientific research in what is one of the broadest and most multi-disciplinary healthcare specialties. While original articles and systematic reviews lie at the heart of the Journal, we also value and recognise the need for opinion articles, case reports and correspondence to guide clinically and scientifically important areas in which conclusive evidence is lacking. The style of the Journal is based on its founding mission statement to ‘instruct, inform and entertain by encompassing the best aspects of both tabloid and broadsheet''.
期刊最新文献
Predicting risk of maternal critical care admission in Scotland: Development of a risk prediction model. Management of traumatic brain injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome-What evidence exists? A scoping review. Psychological impact of an intensive care admission for COVID-19 on patients in the United Kingdom. Exploring perspectives of supporting the process of dying, death and bereavement among critical care staff: A multidisciplinary, qualitative approach. Factors to consider when designing post-hospital interventions to support critical illness recovery: Systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1