Adaptation and validation of a tool for the quality assessment of genetic counseling in Brazil: perspectives from clinical geneticists.

IF 1.5 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY Journal of Community Genetics Pub Date : 2025-01-18 DOI:10.1007/s12687-025-00767-6
Maria Vitoria Gomes da Silva, Kathleen da Silva Sousa, Catarina Costa, Carolina Lemos, Milena Paneque, Carla Maria Ramos Germano, Lucimar Retto da Silva de Avó, Débora Gusmão Melo
{"title":"Adaptation and validation of a tool for the quality assessment of genetic counseling in Brazil: perspectives from clinical geneticists.","authors":"Maria Vitoria Gomes da Silva, Kathleen da Silva Sousa, Catarina Costa, Carolina Lemos, Milena Paneque, Carla Maria Ramos Germano, Lucimar Retto da Silva de Avó, Débora Gusmão Melo","doi":"10.1007/s12687-025-00767-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2018, Portuguese researchers proposed the \"Tool for Quality Assessment of Genetic Counseling,\" a 5-point Likert scale comprising 50 items across five dimensions, designed to assess genetic counseling from the professional's perspective. This descriptive, cross-sectional study aimed to adapt this tool to Brazilian Portuguese, validate it among Brazilian clinical geneticists, and conduct a preliminary assessment of the quality of genetic counseling in Brazil. The adaptation process involved expert-driven content validation and calculation of the Content Validity Index (CVI) to ensure equivalence between the original and adapted versions. The adapted tool was subsequently administered to 81 clinical geneticists, including physicians and nurses, and the data were analyzed using Principal Component Analysis. Items with factor loadings above 0.4 were retained for interpretive purposes. Results were normalized and categorized. The adapted items achieved acceptable CVIs, ranging from 0.831 to 1.0, demonstrating strong validity. Scale results revealed that the dimensions \"genetic counseling outcomes\" (100%), \"education\" (86.41%), and \"individual attributes\" (80%) were rated as very good, \"counselor-client relationship\" (76.33%) as good, and \"service functioning\" (59.95%) as sufficient. These findings indicated that although participants perceived the genetic counseling they provided as achieving desired outcomes, deficiencies in service functioning negatively impacted perceptions of overall quality, highlighting the need for systemic improvements to enhance service delivery. This cross-cultural adaptation validated a reliable new instrument for Brazilian professionals, providing a robust foundation for future research and applications in diverse clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":46965,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-025-00767-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2018, Portuguese researchers proposed the "Tool for Quality Assessment of Genetic Counseling," a 5-point Likert scale comprising 50 items across five dimensions, designed to assess genetic counseling from the professional's perspective. This descriptive, cross-sectional study aimed to adapt this tool to Brazilian Portuguese, validate it among Brazilian clinical geneticists, and conduct a preliminary assessment of the quality of genetic counseling in Brazil. The adaptation process involved expert-driven content validation and calculation of the Content Validity Index (CVI) to ensure equivalence between the original and adapted versions. The adapted tool was subsequently administered to 81 clinical geneticists, including physicians and nurses, and the data were analyzed using Principal Component Analysis. Items with factor loadings above 0.4 were retained for interpretive purposes. Results were normalized and categorized. The adapted items achieved acceptable CVIs, ranging from 0.831 to 1.0, demonstrating strong validity. Scale results revealed that the dimensions "genetic counseling outcomes" (100%), "education" (86.41%), and "individual attributes" (80%) were rated as very good, "counselor-client relationship" (76.33%) as good, and "service functioning" (59.95%) as sufficient. These findings indicated that although participants perceived the genetic counseling they provided as achieving desired outcomes, deficiencies in service functioning negatively impacted perceptions of overall quality, highlighting the need for systemic improvements to enhance service delivery. This cross-cultural adaptation validated a reliable new instrument for Brazilian professionals, providing a robust foundation for future research and applications in diverse clinical settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西遗传咨询质量评估工具的适应和验证:来自临床遗传学家的观点。
2018年,葡萄牙研究人员提出了“遗传咨询质量评估工具”,这是一个5分李克特量表,包括5个维度的50个项目,旨在从专业人士的角度评估遗传咨询。本描述性横断面研究旨在使该工具适用于巴西葡萄牙语,在巴西临床遗传学家中进行验证,并对巴西遗传咨询的质量进行初步评估。改编过程包括专家驱动的内容验证和内容有效性指数(CVI)的计算,以确保原始版本和改编版本之间的等效性。随后,81名临床遗传学家(包括医生和护士)使用了经过调整的工具,并使用主成分分析对数据进行了分析。为便于解释,因子负荷高于0.4的项目被保留。结果归一化并分类。调整后的项目均达到了可接受的CVIs值,范围为0.831 ~ 1.0,显示出较强的效度。量表结果显示,“遗传咨询结果”(100%)、“教育程度”(86.41%)、“个人属性”(80%)维度评价非常好,“咨客关系”(76.33%)评价良好,“服务功能”(59.95%)评价充分。这些发现表明,尽管参与者认为他们提供的遗传咨询达到了预期的结果,但服务功能的缺陷对整体质量的看法产生了负面影响,突出了系统改进以加强服务提供的必要性。这种跨文化适应验证了巴西专业人员可靠的新工具,为未来在不同临床环境中的研究和应用提供了坚实的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Community Genetics
Journal of Community Genetics GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Community Genetics is an international forum for research in the ever-expanding field of community genetics, the art and science of applying medical genetics to human communities for the benefit of their individuals. Community genetics comprises all activities which identify persons at increased genetic risk and has an interest in assessing this risk, in order to enable those at risk to make informed decisions. Community genetics services thus encompass such activities as genetic screening, registration of genetic conditions in the population, routine preconceptional and prenatal genetic consultations, public education on genetic issues, and public debate on related ethical issues. The Journal of Community Genetics has a multidisciplinary scope. It covers medical genetics, epidemiology, genetics in primary care, public health aspects of genetics, and ethical, legal, social and economic issues. Its intention is to serve as a forum for community genetics worldwide, with a focus on low- and middle-income countries. The journal features original research papers, reviews, short communications, program reports, news, and correspondence. Program reports describe illustrative projects in the field of community genetics, e.g., design and progress of an educational program or the protocol and achievement of a gene bank. Case reports describing individual patients are not accepted.
期刊最新文献
The other side of variant transthyretin amyloidosis with polyneuropathy: psychosocial experience of members of Portuguese families with late onset of the disease. Genetic counselling for psychiatric conditions: exploring current perceptions of family physicians and psychiatrists in Portugal. Healthcare delay in neurogenetic disorders of adult onset and the role of predictive genetic testing. Is Brazil following global trends in high-cost treatments? The case of Pompe Disease. Epidemiological surveillance in congenital anomalies and rare diseases in Brazil: present situation and future challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1