Embryo Cryopreservation: What do couples think about it?

IF 1.8 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.5935/1518-0557.20240093
Julia Picinato Medeiros de Araujo Rocha, Carolina Gennari Verruma, Ana Luiza Camargos Morato, Maria Cristina Picinato, Rui Alberto Ferriani, Rosana Maria Dos Reis
{"title":"Embryo Cryopreservation: What do couples think about it?","authors":"Julia Picinato Medeiros de Araujo Rocha, Carolina Gennari Verruma, Ana Luiza Camargos Morato, Maria Cristina Picinato, Rui Alberto Ferriani, Rosana Maria Dos Reis","doi":"10.5935/1518-0557.20240093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the perspectives of infertile couples regarding embryo cryopreservation throughout assisted reproduction treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The convenience sample included infertile couples undergoing assisted reproduction treatment. They responded to a questionnaire specifically designed to gauge views and opinions on cryopreservation of surplus embryos. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS, employing the Mann-Whitney U and Fisher's exact tests (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 187 couples, with average ages of 35 years for women and 38 years for men. A total of 182 couples (97.3%) agreed with the practice of freezing surplus embryos and, the desire to increase the odds of pregnancy within the same ovarian stimulation cycle was the main motivation (89%). Almost 40% of participants said they might consider embryo donation to other couples for assisted reproductive treatment. However, less than 20% of volunteers (15.38% of women and 12.08% of men) expressed the desire to donate for research purposes. Women with higher levels of education were significantly (p<0.05) more likely to support the donation of surplus embryos for research. Gender, religion, and education did not influence (p>0.05) the respondents' perspectives regarding the beginning of life and posthumous conception.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Embryo cryopreservation provides infertile couples with hope however, the fate of surplus embryos remains controversial. A careful approach with appropriate regulation is necessary to ensure safe and ethical practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":46364,"journal":{"name":"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20240093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the perspectives of infertile couples regarding embryo cryopreservation throughout assisted reproduction treatment.

Methods: The convenience sample included infertile couples undergoing assisted reproduction treatment. They responded to a questionnaire specifically designed to gauge views and opinions on cryopreservation of surplus embryos. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS, employing the Mann-Whitney U and Fisher's exact tests (p<0.05).

Results: The study included 187 couples, with average ages of 35 years for women and 38 years for men. A total of 182 couples (97.3%) agreed with the practice of freezing surplus embryos and, the desire to increase the odds of pregnancy within the same ovarian stimulation cycle was the main motivation (89%). Almost 40% of participants said they might consider embryo donation to other couples for assisted reproductive treatment. However, less than 20% of volunteers (15.38% of women and 12.08% of men) expressed the desire to donate for research purposes. Women with higher levels of education were significantly (p<0.05) more likely to support the donation of surplus embryos for research. Gender, religion, and education did not influence (p>0.05) the respondents' perspectives regarding the beginning of life and posthumous conception.

Conclusions: Embryo cryopreservation provides infertile couples with hope however, the fate of surplus embryos remains controversial. A careful approach with appropriate regulation is necessary to ensure safe and ethical practices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
56
期刊最新文献
Embryo Cryopreservation: What do couples think about it? Advanced 3Dimentional engineered microenvironment to improve of in vitro spermatogenesis: narrative review. Do LGTB people desire to have children? A Brazilian cross-sectional survey. Effect of hydro-ethanol extract of Caesalpinia pulcherrima (L.) Sw. leaves in human and rat: In vitro approach of male contraceptive development. Impact of Infertility and Medically Assisted Reproduction Treatments on Female Sexuality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1