Prevalence of direct antiglobulin test positive in whole blood donors: Study at a tertiary blood center Northern India.

IF 0.6 Q4 HEMATOLOGY Asian Journal of Transfusion Science Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-21 DOI:10.4103/ajts.ajts_188_23
Jyoti Bharti, Archana Solanki, Ashutosh Singh, Mallika Agarwal, Tulika Chandra
{"title":"Prevalence of direct antiglobulin test positive in whole blood donors: Study at a tertiary blood center Northern India.","authors":"Jyoti Bharti, Archana Solanki, Ashutosh Singh, Mallika Agarwal, Tulika Chandra","doi":"10.4103/ajts.ajts_188_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The direct antiglobulin test (DAT) detects red blood cell (RBC) sensitivity to complement or IgG <i>in vivo</i>. The clinical disorders of hemolytic disease of the newborn, hemolytic transfusion reaction, and autoimmune and drug-induced hemolytic anemia are some examples of those that can cause <i>in vivo</i> coating of RBCs with antibodies or complement autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA). Rarely, DAT is positive in nonimmune-mediated hemolytic anemias as well. Standard donor screening techniques do not require the DAT to be performed.</p><p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>The aim of the study was to assess the prevalence of DAT positive in healthy blood donors at a tertiary blood center in North India.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This 2-year prospective observational study included whole blood donors from January 2020 to December 2022. A total of 152,564 healthy blood donors including 150,246 (98.5%) males and 2318 (1.5%) females were donated at the department of transfusion medicine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of a total of 152,564 donors, 150,246 (98.5%) were male, and 2,318 (1.5%) were female. Among the male donors, 11 (0.007%) had a history of blood transfusion and 16 (0.011%) tested DAT positive. Among the female donors, 15 (0.647%) had a history of blood transfusion and none of them tested DAT positive.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We observed low levels of DAT positivity in healthy blood donors. Such donors should be regularly monitored to check for any long-term development of malignancies or clinical or laboratory indications of hemolysis. DAT-positive blood units do not supply the recipient at risk, which may cause negative consequences.</p>","PeriodicalId":42296,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Transfusion Science","volume":"18 2","pages":"237-241"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11734789/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Transfusion Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ajts.ajts_188_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The direct antiglobulin test (DAT) detects red blood cell (RBC) sensitivity to complement or IgG in vivo. The clinical disorders of hemolytic disease of the newborn, hemolytic transfusion reaction, and autoimmune and drug-induced hemolytic anemia are some examples of those that can cause in vivo coating of RBCs with antibodies or complement autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA). Rarely, DAT is positive in nonimmune-mediated hemolytic anemias as well. Standard donor screening techniques do not require the DAT to be performed.

Aims and objectives: The aim of the study was to assess the prevalence of DAT positive in healthy blood donors at a tertiary blood center in North India.

Materials and methods: This 2-year prospective observational study included whole blood donors from January 2020 to December 2022. A total of 152,564 healthy blood donors including 150,246 (98.5%) males and 2318 (1.5%) females were donated at the department of transfusion medicine.

Results: Of a total of 152,564 donors, 150,246 (98.5%) were male, and 2,318 (1.5%) were female. Among the male donors, 11 (0.007%) had a history of blood transfusion and 16 (0.011%) tested DAT positive. Among the female donors, 15 (0.647%) had a history of blood transfusion and none of them tested DAT positive.

Conclusion: We observed low levels of DAT positivity in healthy blood donors. Such donors should be regularly monitored to check for any long-term development of malignancies or clinical or laboratory indications of hemolysis. DAT-positive blood units do not supply the recipient at risk, which may cause negative consequences.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全血献血者中直接抗球蛋白测试阳性的患病率:印度北部三级血液中心的研究。
背景:直接抗球蛋白试验(DAT)检测红细胞(RBC)对体内补体或IgG的敏感性。新生儿溶血性疾病、溶血性输血反应、自身免疫性和药物性溶血性贫血等临床疾病是导致红细胞在体内被抗体或补体自身免疫性溶血性贫血(AIHA)的一些例子。在非免疫介导的溶血性贫血中,DAT也很少呈阳性。标准的供体筛选技术不需要进行DAT。目的和目的:本研究的目的是评估印度北部三级血液中心健康献血者中DAT阳性的流行程度。材料和方法:这项为期2年的前瞻性观察性研究纳入了2020年1月至2022年12月的全血献血者。输血医学部共有152564名健康献血者,其中男性150246人(98.5%),女性2318人(1.5%)。结果:152564例献血者中,男性150246例(98.5%),女性2318例(1.5%)。男性献血者中有输血史11例(0.007%),DAT阳性16例(0.011%)。女性献血者中有输血史15例(0.647%),均无DAT阳性。结论:我们在健康的献血者中观察到低水平的DAT阳性。应定期监测这些献血者,以检查是否有恶性肿瘤的长期发展或溶血的临床或实验室指征。dat阳性的血液单位不提供有风险的受体,这可能会造成负面后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
44 weeks
期刊最新文献
Serial intrauterine transfusion for severe fetal anemia due to anti-M alloimmunization. Pilot study to understand and compare challenges being faced in reporting of transfusion reactions in various types of blood banks enrolled under Haemovigilance Programme of India. Safety and efficacy of therapeutic plasma exchange in neuromyelitis optica: A retrospective study from South India. Serological comparison of weak D versus weakly reacting D by four different methods. Smart approaches for encouraging the blood donation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1