"We Want parkrun to Well Outlive Us": Behind the Dissemination and Sustainability of parkrun in Australia.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Qualitative Health Research Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1177/10497323241307202
Leonie Cranney, Anne C Grunseit, Femke van Nassau, Andrew Milat, Verity Cleland
{"title":"\"We Want <i>parkrun</i> to Well Outlive Us\": Behind the Dissemination and Sustainability of <i>parkrun</i> in Australia.","authors":"Leonie Cranney, Anne C Grunseit, Femke van Nassau, Andrew Milat, Verity Cleland","doi":"10.1177/10497323241307202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>parkrun</i> is a free, weekly organized mass participation physical activity event providing a remarkable example of at-scale dissemination, with over 1 million participants and 150,000 volunteers in Australia. This qualitative study draws on stakeholders' experiences to explore how <i>parkrun</i> succeeded with its dissemination and sustainability in Australia. Maximum variation and snowball sampling methods were used to select interviewees representing three <i>parkrun</i> stakeholder groups: <i>parkrun</i> Australia employees; volunteer organizers (event directors and ambassadors); and local external stakeholders (e.g., running clubs and landowners). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 67 adult stakeholders in two phases (February-May and August-October 2023). We conducted a reflexive thematic analysis of interview data to explore contextual factors and mechanisms of <i>parkrun</i> growth and sustainability. We identify four themes to explain the growth and sustainability of <i>parkrun</i> in Australia: \"Belief in an essential <i>parkrun</i>\" comprises varied but overlapping ideas of what <i>parkrun</i> is fundamentally about; \"Fluidity of movement\" reflects the way individuals move freely in and out of the <i>parkrun</i> model, between roles and events; \"Organizational and individual evolution\" describes individuals' engagement journey and how the organization adapted with growth; and \"Shared custodianship\" reflects the dispersed leadership and shared responsibility across time, place, and people. These themes illustrate elements of the <i>parkrun</i> model that create broad buy-in, foster stakeholder commitment and longevity, and maximize resources for enhanced reach, dissemination, and sustainability. Our findings contribute practice-based evidence that may inform scale-up and sustainment of similar public health interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48437,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Health Research","volume":" ","pages":"10497323241307202"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323241307202","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

parkrun is a free, weekly organized mass participation physical activity event providing a remarkable example of at-scale dissemination, with over 1 million participants and 150,000 volunteers in Australia. This qualitative study draws on stakeholders' experiences to explore how parkrun succeeded with its dissemination and sustainability in Australia. Maximum variation and snowball sampling methods were used to select interviewees representing three parkrun stakeholder groups: parkrun Australia employees; volunteer organizers (event directors and ambassadors); and local external stakeholders (e.g., running clubs and landowners). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 67 adult stakeholders in two phases (February-May and August-October 2023). We conducted a reflexive thematic analysis of interview data to explore contextual factors and mechanisms of parkrun growth and sustainability. We identify four themes to explain the growth and sustainability of parkrun in Australia: "Belief in an essential parkrun" comprises varied but overlapping ideas of what parkrun is fundamentally about; "Fluidity of movement" reflects the way individuals move freely in and out of the parkrun model, between roles and events; "Organizational and individual evolution" describes individuals' engagement journey and how the organization adapted with growth; and "Shared custodianship" reflects the dispersed leadership and shared responsibility across time, place, and people. These themes illustrate elements of the parkrun model that create broad buy-in, foster stakeholder commitment and longevity, and maximize resources for enhanced reach, dissemination, and sustainability. Our findings contribute practice-based evidence that may inform scale-up and sustainment of similar public health interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“我们希望parkrun比我们活得更久”:澳大利亚parkrun的传播和可持续性背后。
parkrun是一个免费的、每周有组织的大众参与的体育活动,提供了一个显著的大规模传播的例子,在澳大利亚有超过100万参与者和15万志愿者。本定性研究借鉴了利益相关者的经验,探讨parkrun在澳大利亚的传播和可持续性是如何成功的。使用最大变异和滚雪球抽样方法选择代表三个parkrun利益相关者群体的受访者:parkrun澳大利亚员工;志愿者组织者(活动总监和大使);以及当地的外部利益相关者(例如,跑步俱乐部和土地所有者)。我们分两个阶段(2023年2月至5月和8月至10月)对67名成年利益相关者进行了半结构化访谈。我们对访谈数据进行了反身性的主题分析,以探讨公园乐园增长和可持续性的语境因素和机制。我们确定了四个主题来解释澳大利亚公园跑的发展和可持续性:“对基本公园跑的信念”包括对公园跑的基本概念的不同但重叠的想法;“运动的流动性”反映了个体在角色和事件之间自由进出parkrun模式的方式;“组织和个人进化”描述了个人的参与历程以及组织如何适应成长;而“共同管理”则反映了分散的领导和跨越时间、地点和人员的共同责任。这些主题说明了公园公园模式的要素,这些要素创造了广泛的支持,促进了利益相关者的承诺和寿命,并最大限度地提高了资源的覆盖面、传播和可持续性。我们的发现提供了基于实践的证据,可能为扩大和维持类似的公共卫生干预提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH is an international, interdisciplinary, refereed journal for the enhancement of health care and to further the development and understanding of qualitative research methods in health care settings. We welcome manuscripts in the following areas: the description and analysis of the illness experience, health and health-seeking behaviors, the experiences of caregivers, the sociocultural organization of health care, health care policy, and related topics. We also seek critical reviews and commentaries addressing conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and ethical issues pertaining to qualitative enquiry.
期刊最新文献
"Switching Hats": Insights From Experienced Clinical Interviewers Turned Novice Research Interviewers. "Look at You Having Fun With Your Markers in Here!": Child Life Specialists' Countering of Infantilizating Narratives in Adult Oncology. How Mobile Health Can Change the Contexts of Living With HIV and Engaging With Treatment and Care in Iran: A Realist-Informed Qualitative Study. Living With Cancer: Child-Parent Dyads' Perspectives and Experiences From a Private Tertiary Care Hospital in Pakistan. Sero-Kinship: How Young People Living With HIV/AIDS Survive in Southeast Nigeria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1