Is this an underestimated problem? Using coercion before psychiatric hospitalization.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q1 LAW International Journal of Law and Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1016/j.ijlp.2025.102068
Urszula Zaniewska-Chłopik, Marcin Zarzycki, Maria Załuska
{"title":"Is this an underestimated problem? Using coercion before psychiatric hospitalization.","authors":"Urszula Zaniewska-Chłopik, Marcin Zarzycki, Maria Załuska","doi":"10.1016/j.ijlp.2025.102068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Mental Health Act (1994) specifies rules of use for direct coercion in Poland. Coercion in psychiatric wards may improve the safety of patients and surroundings but influences compliance and satisfaction with treatment. Legal (formal) coercion regulated by law isn't the one and only form of coercion used on people with mental disorders. Pressure, threats and orders from relatives and medical staff in relation to procedures of referral and admission to a psychiatric hospital can be described as informal coercion. In Poland there aren't many studies on the use of coercion before psychiatric hospitalization, which justifies the need to conduct this research.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Assessment of the extent of coercive measures used prior to admission and the relationships between the use of direct coercion and selected demographic-clinical factors.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This study was conducted as part of statutory research at the 4th Clinic of the Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology at the Bielanski Hospital in Warsaw from 1.06.13. to 31.05.14. on all the patients admitted to the psychiatric ward in that period. We gathered data on the extent of coercion in the process of hospital referral, and demographic and clinical data was collected. The following tools were used: a specially prepared questionnaire on the extent of the coercion used prior to admission at the hospital, questionnaire on demographic and clinical data, the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Coercion prior to admission to the hospital was applied to 53 % of patients, 45 % received informal coercion, and 8 % were physically coerced. Man were more likely to be coerced than women, for people diagnosed with F10-F19 and F20-F29, physical coercion was used more frequently than in patients with other disorders. Patients undergoing informal coercion on the way to the hospital were significantly older than those who weren't exposed on coercion or experienced physical coercion. Higher severity of almost all BPRS subscales (without anxiety and depression subscale) be found in patients who were coerced on their way to hospital than in patients who were not coerced. In the analysis of the logistic regression use of coercion prior to admission to the hospital was positively associated with admission without consent, severity of negative symptoms as well as negatively associated with severity of depression symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The high probability of experience coercion before admission to the psychiatric hospital suggests more attention should be paid to procedures connected with referral and transport before psychiatric hospitalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":47930,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry","volume":"99 ","pages":"102068"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2025.102068","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Mental Health Act (1994) specifies rules of use for direct coercion in Poland. Coercion in psychiatric wards may improve the safety of patients and surroundings but influences compliance and satisfaction with treatment. Legal (formal) coercion regulated by law isn't the one and only form of coercion used on people with mental disorders. Pressure, threats and orders from relatives and medical staff in relation to procedures of referral and admission to a psychiatric hospital can be described as informal coercion. In Poland there aren't many studies on the use of coercion before psychiatric hospitalization, which justifies the need to conduct this research.

Objectives: Assessment of the extent of coercive measures used prior to admission and the relationships between the use of direct coercion and selected demographic-clinical factors.

Material and methods: This study was conducted as part of statutory research at the 4th Clinic of the Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology at the Bielanski Hospital in Warsaw from 1.06.13. to 31.05.14. on all the patients admitted to the psychiatric ward in that period. We gathered data on the extent of coercion in the process of hospital referral, and demographic and clinical data was collected. The following tools were used: a specially prepared questionnaire on the extent of the coercion used prior to admission at the hospital, questionnaire on demographic and clinical data, the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS).

Results: Coercion prior to admission to the hospital was applied to 53 % of patients, 45 % received informal coercion, and 8 % were physically coerced. Man were more likely to be coerced than women, for people diagnosed with F10-F19 and F20-F29, physical coercion was used more frequently than in patients with other disorders. Patients undergoing informal coercion on the way to the hospital were significantly older than those who weren't exposed on coercion or experienced physical coercion. Higher severity of almost all BPRS subscales (without anxiety and depression subscale) be found in patients who were coerced on their way to hospital than in patients who were not coerced. In the analysis of the logistic regression use of coercion prior to admission to the hospital was positively associated with admission without consent, severity of negative symptoms as well as negatively associated with severity of depression symptoms.

Conclusions: The high probability of experience coercion before admission to the psychiatric hospital suggests more attention should be paid to procedures connected with referral and transport before psychiatric hospitalization.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
这是一个被低估的问题吗?在精神病住院前使用胁迫手段。
背景:《精神卫生法》(1994年)规定了在波兰使用直接胁迫的规则。精神科病房的强迫可以改善病人和周围环境的安全,但影响依从性和对治疗的满意度。法律规定的合法(正式)胁迫并不是用于精神障碍患者的唯一胁迫形式。亲属和医务人员在转介和进入精神病院的程序方面施加的压力、威胁和命令可称为非正式胁迫。在波兰,关于精神病住院前使用胁迫的研究并不多,这证明了进行这项研究的必要性。目的:评估入院前使用的强制措施的程度,以及使用直接强制与选定的人口-临床因素之间的关系。材料和方法:本研究于2013年6月1日在华沙Bielanski医院精神病学和神经病学研究所第四诊所作为法定研究的一部分进行。31.05.14。这段时间精神病病房所有病人的数据。我们收集了医院转诊过程中强迫程度的数据,并收集了人口统计和临床数据。使用了以下工具:一份专门编制的关于入院前使用胁迫程度的调查问卷、关于人口统计和临床数据的调查问卷、简短精神病评定量表(BPRS)。结果:53%的患者在入院前受到胁迫,45%的患者受到非正式胁迫,8%的患者受到身体胁迫。男性比女性更有可能被强迫,对于被诊断为F10-F19和F20-F29的人来说,身体强迫比其他疾病的患者更频繁。在去医院的路上遭受非正式胁迫的患者明显比没有遭受胁迫或身体胁迫的患者年龄大。在去医院的路上被强迫的患者的几乎所有BPRS分量表(不包括焦虑和抑郁分量表)的严重程度都高于未被强迫的患者。在逻辑回归分析中,入院前使用胁迫与未经同意入院、阴性症状的严重程度呈正相关,与抑郁症状的严重程度负相关。结论:精神科患者入院前遭遇经验胁迫的概率较高,应重视入院前转诊和转运的相关程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.70%
发文量
54
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Law and Psychiatry is intended to provide a multi-disciplinary forum for the exchange of ideas and information among professionals concerned with the interface of law and psychiatry. There is a growing awareness of the need for exploring the fundamental goals of both the legal and psychiatric systems and the social implications of their interaction. The journal seeks to enhance understanding and cooperation in the field through the varied approaches represented, not only by law and psychiatry, but also by the social sciences and related disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Coercive measures in disability and mental health care services: Mechanical restraints from a bioethical and legal perspective in Spain. Is this an underestimated problem? Using coercion before psychiatric hospitalization. The use of community treatment orders in people with substance induced psychosis. No man's land: Troubling the borders of mental health and capacity law. Reasons behind the rise in involuntary psychiatric treatment under mental health act 2016, Queensland, Australia - Clinician perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1