A study of preservice teachers’ digital competence development: Exploring the role of direct instruction, integrated practice, and modeling

IF 2 4区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Evaluation and Program Planning Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-12 DOI:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102538
Levon Momdjian , Marni Manegre , Mar Gutiérrez-Colón
{"title":"A study of preservice teachers’ digital competence development: Exploring the role of direct instruction, integrated practice, and modeling","authors":"Levon Momdjian ,&nbsp;Marni Manegre ,&nbsp;Mar Gutiérrez-Colón","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As technology rapidly transforms educational landscapes, the imperative for teachers to possess digital competence becomes increasingly vital. This paper explores the effectiveness of different approaches employed by teacher education programs in equipping preservice teachers with digital competence. The study categorizes these approaches into three main groups: direct, integrated, and modeling. Through an analysis based on the DigCompEdu framework, the study aims to explore the relationship between teacher training approaches and the development of preservice teachers' digital competences. A mixed-methods approach, including surveys and document analyses, was utilized, involving 399 preservice teachers and 84 teacher educators from various Lebanese teacher training programs. The results indicate that teacher educators’ modeling plays a pivotal role in influencing preservice teachers' overall digital competence, surpassing the impact of both direct and integrated approaches. Recommendations include prioritizing digital professional development for teacher educators, revising curricula, addressing course design effectiveness, and enhancing both direct and integrated approaches. These insights aim to inform the design and improvement of teacher training programs to meet the evolving demands of digital education.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48046,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation and Program Planning","volume":"109 ","pages":"Article 102538"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation and Program Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925000059","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As technology rapidly transforms educational landscapes, the imperative for teachers to possess digital competence becomes increasingly vital. This paper explores the effectiveness of different approaches employed by teacher education programs in equipping preservice teachers with digital competence. The study categorizes these approaches into three main groups: direct, integrated, and modeling. Through an analysis based on the DigCompEdu framework, the study aims to explore the relationship between teacher training approaches and the development of preservice teachers' digital competences. A mixed-methods approach, including surveys and document analyses, was utilized, involving 399 preservice teachers and 84 teacher educators from various Lebanese teacher training programs. The results indicate that teacher educators’ modeling plays a pivotal role in influencing preservice teachers' overall digital competence, surpassing the impact of both direct and integrated approaches. Recommendations include prioritizing digital professional development for teacher educators, revising curricula, addressing course design effectiveness, and enhancing both direct and integrated approaches. These insights aim to inform the design and improvement of teacher training programs to meet the evolving demands of digital education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
职前教师数字化能力发展研究:探讨直接教学、综合实践和建模的作用。
随着技术迅速改变教育格局,教师拥有数字能力的必要性变得越来越重要。本文探讨了教师教育项目在为职前教师配备数字能力方面采用的不同方法的有效性。该研究将这些方法分为三大类:直接、集成和建模。通过基于DigCompEdu框架的分析,本研究旨在探讨教师培训方式与职前教师数字能力发展之间的关系。采用了包括调查和文件分析在内的混合方法,涉及来自黎巴嫩各种教师培训方案的399名职前教师和84名教师教育工作者。结果表明,教师教育建模在影响职前教师整体数字能力方面发挥了关键作用,超过了直接方法和综合方法的影响。建议包括优先考虑教师教育工作者的数字专业发展,修订课程,解决课程设计的有效性,以及加强直接和综合方法。这些见解旨在为教师培训计划的设计和改进提供信息,以满足数字教育不断变化的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Evaluation and Program Planning
Evaluation and Program Planning SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: Evaluation and Program Planning is based on the principle that the techniques and methods of evaluation and planning transcend the boundaries of specific fields and that relevant contributions to these areas come from people representing many different positions, intellectual traditions, and interests. In order to further the development of evaluation and planning, we publish articles from the private and public sectors in a wide range of areas: organizational development and behavior, training, planning, human resource development, health and mental, social services, mental retardation, corrections, substance abuse, and education.
期刊最新文献
Implementation fidelity of a sport-based positive youth development program designed to teach sport and social skills Lessons learned from a collective evaluation and community of practice focused on evidence-based learning Evaluation policies in international non-governmental humanitarian organisations From needs to dreams: An aspiration-based community needs assessment methodology From strategy to evaluation: A social determinants of healthy campus framework for evaluating U.S. campus health programs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1