To add or to remove? The role of working memory updating in preschool children's non-symbolic arithmetic abilities between addition and subtraction.

IF 1.8 2区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Journal of Experimental Child Psychology Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106182
Tongyan Ren, Jiyueyi Wang, Mingxin Li, Xuechen Ding, Chen Cheng
{"title":"To add or to remove? The role of working memory updating in preschool children's non-symbolic arithmetic abilities between addition and subtraction.","authors":"Tongyan Ren, Jiyueyi Wang, Mingxin Li, Xuechen Ding, Chen Cheng","doi":"10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Early computational capacity sets the foundation for mathematical learning. Preschool children have been shown to perform both non-symbolic addition and subtraction problems. However, it is still unknown how different operations affect the representational precision of the non-symbolic arithmetic solutions. The current study compared 83 4- and 5-year-olds' ability to solve non-symbolic addition and subtraction problems and examined the role of working memory underlying the two arithmetic processes. In the task, children were shown two sets of arrays that were sequentially occluded and were asked to either sum the arrays up (addition) or remove one array from the other (subtraction). The solution was then compared with a visible array. Children also completed two working memory tasks to measure their working memory storage and updating abilities. Results showed that children's representational precision in addition was higher than that in subtraction. Although children's performance in both arithmetic operations were associated with working memory updating, solving subtractive problems imposed additional cognitive resources in working memory updating. These findings reveal early developmental differences between addition and subtraction. Children's computational capacity in both addition and subtraction develops early in childhood, and the operation in subtraction demands more mental manipulation in working memory.</p>","PeriodicalId":48391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","volume":"252 ","pages":"106182"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106182","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Early computational capacity sets the foundation for mathematical learning. Preschool children have been shown to perform both non-symbolic addition and subtraction problems. However, it is still unknown how different operations affect the representational precision of the non-symbolic arithmetic solutions. The current study compared 83 4- and 5-year-olds' ability to solve non-symbolic addition and subtraction problems and examined the role of working memory underlying the two arithmetic processes. In the task, children were shown two sets of arrays that were sequentially occluded and were asked to either sum the arrays up (addition) or remove one array from the other (subtraction). The solution was then compared with a visible array. Children also completed two working memory tasks to measure their working memory storage and updating abilities. Results showed that children's representational precision in addition was higher than that in subtraction. Although children's performance in both arithmetic operations were associated with working memory updating, solving subtractive problems imposed additional cognitive resources in working memory updating. These findings reveal early developmental differences between addition and subtraction. Children's computational capacity in both addition and subtraction develops early in childhood, and the operation in subtraction demands more mental manipulation in working memory.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
添加还是删除?工作记忆更新在学龄前儿童非符号算术加减法能力中的作用。
早期的计算能力为数学学习奠定了基础。学龄前儿童已经被证明可以执行非符号加法和减法问题。然而,不同的运算对非符号算术解的表示精度的影响仍是未知的。目前的研究比较了83名4岁和5岁儿童解决非符号加法和减法问题的能力,并检验了工作记忆在这两种算术过程中的作用。在这项任务中,孩子们被展示了两组依次被遮挡的数组,并被要求将数组相加(加法)或从另一个数组中删除一个数组(减法)。然后将该解决方案与可见数组进行比较。儿童还完成了两个工作记忆任务,以衡量他们的工作记忆存储和更新能力。结果表明,儿童加法的表征精度高于减法。尽管儿童在两种算术运算中的表现都与工作记忆更新有关,但解决减法问题在工作记忆更新中施加了额外的认知资源。这些发现揭示了加法和减法之间的早期发育差异。儿童的加减法运算能力在童年早期就有发展,减法运算需要更多的工作记忆心理操作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
190
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Child Psychology is an excellent source of information concerning all aspects of the development of children. It includes empirical psychological research on cognitive, social/emotional, and physical development. In addition, the journal periodically publishes Special Topic issues.
期刊最新文献
The relation of verbal and nonverbal skills to basic numerical processing of preterm versus term-born preschoolers. Do children match described probabilities? The sampling hypothesis applied to repeated risky choice. Can gamification improve children's performance in mental rotation? Examining the factor structure of the home learning environment. Parental mathematics anxiety is related to children's mathematical development in preschool and the first school years.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1