Examining Baseline Relations Between Parent–Child Interactions and STEM Engagement and Learning

IF 3.1 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Developmental Science Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1111/desc.13611
Skyler Gin, Heyang Yin, C. Malik Boykin, David M. Sobel
{"title":"Examining Baseline Relations Between Parent–Child Interactions and STEM Engagement and Learning","authors":"Skyler Gin,&nbsp;Heyang Yin,&nbsp;C. Malik Boykin,&nbsp;David M. Sobel","doi":"10.1111/desc.13611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Several studies suggest that children's learning and engagement with the content of play activities is affected by the ways parents and children interact. In particular, when parents are overly directive and set more goals during play with their children, their children tend to play less or are less engaged by subsequent challenges with the activity on their own. A concern, however, is that this directed interaction style is only compared with other styles of parent–child interaction, not with a baseline measure of engagement or learning. The present study incorporates such a baseline measure, comparing it with previously-collected data on children's engagement and learning in a set of circuit-building challenges. Regarding engagement, children were less engaged by the challenges when their parents were more directed during a free play setting (tested in Sobel et al. 2021) than when children had no prior experience playing with the circuit components. Regarding learning, children were better able to complete the circuit challenges and provided more causal explanations for how the completed challenges worked when they had experience playing with the circuit blocks with their parent. Overall, these data suggest that parent–child interaction during a STEM activity relates to both children's engagement and performance on challenges related to that activity.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48392,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Science","volume":"28 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/desc.13611","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several studies suggest that children's learning and engagement with the content of play activities is affected by the ways parents and children interact. In particular, when parents are overly directive and set more goals during play with their children, their children tend to play less or are less engaged by subsequent challenges with the activity on their own. A concern, however, is that this directed interaction style is only compared with other styles of parent–child interaction, not with a baseline measure of engagement or learning. The present study incorporates such a baseline measure, comparing it with previously-collected data on children's engagement and learning in a set of circuit-building challenges. Regarding engagement, children were less engaged by the challenges when their parents were more directed during a free play setting (tested in Sobel et al. 2021) than when children had no prior experience playing with the circuit components. Regarding learning, children were better able to complete the circuit challenges and provided more causal explanations for how the completed challenges worked when they had experience playing with the circuit blocks with their parent. Overall, these data suggest that parent–child interaction during a STEM activity relates to both children's engagement and performance on challenges related to that activity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究亲子互动与STEM参与和学习之间的基线关系。
几项研究表明,儿童的学习和参与游戏活动的内容受到父母和儿童互动方式的影响。特别是,当父母在与孩子玩耍时过度指导和设定更多目标时,他们的孩子往往会玩得更少,或者更少参与到随后的挑战中。然而,值得关注的是,这种直接的互动风格只是与其他类型的亲子互动进行比较,而不是与参与或学习的基线测量进行比较。目前的研究包含了这样一个基线测量,将其与之前收集的关于儿童参与和学习一系列电路构建挑战的数据进行比较。在参与方面,当父母在自由游戏环境中受到更多指导时(Sobel等人在2021年进行了测试),孩子们对挑战的参与程度要低于孩子们之前没有玩电路组件的经验时。在学习方面,当孩子们有和父母一起玩电路积木的经验时,他们能够更好地完成电路挑战,并对完成的挑战如何工作提供更多的因果解释。总体而言,这些数据表明,STEM活动期间的亲子互动与儿童在与该活动相关的挑战中的参与和表现有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
8.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: Developmental Science publishes cutting-edge theory and up-to-the-minute research on scientific developmental psychology from leading thinkers in the field. It is currently the only journal that specifically focuses on human developmental cognitive neuroscience. Coverage includes: - Clinical, computational and comparative approaches to development - Key advances in cognitive and social development - Developmental cognitive neuroscience - Functional neuroimaging of the developing brain
期刊最新文献
Oscillatory But Not Aperiodic Frontal Brain Activity Predicts the Development of Executive Control From Infancy to Toddlerhood Learning by Example: Does Positive Nonverbal Behavior Reduce Children's Racial Bias? The Status of Vernier Acuity Following Late Sight Onset Do Children's Brains Function Differently During Book Reading and Screen Time? A fNIRS Study Every Face Has a Name: Individuation Training Reduces Implicit Racial Bias
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1