Patterns of socioeconomic marginalization and non-fatal overdose among people who use drugs: A gender-stratified repeated measures latent class analysis

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Social Science & Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117661
Sanjana Mitra , Lindsey Richardson , Zishan Cui , Mark Gilbert , M.-J. Milloy , Kanna Hayashi , Thomas Kerr
{"title":"Patterns of socioeconomic marginalization and non-fatal overdose among people who use drugs: A gender-stratified repeated measures latent class analysis","authors":"Sanjana Mitra ,&nbsp;Lindsey Richardson ,&nbsp;Zishan Cui ,&nbsp;Mark Gilbert ,&nbsp;M.-J. Milloy ,&nbsp;Kanna Hayashi ,&nbsp;Thomas Kerr","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>While marked gender-based differences in drug-related risk and harm between men women who use drugs have been characterized to some extent, the complex relationship between gendered socioeconomic conditions, overdose risk, and drug use patterns and behaviours remains underexplored.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted gender-stratified repeated measures latent class analyses (RMLCA) with data from two ongoing cohorts of people who use drugs in Vancouver, Canada to identify discrete subgroups based on socioeconomic exposures. Multivariable generalized estimating equations models weighted by the respective posterior membership probabilities were applied to estimate the associations between socioeconomic class membership and non-fatal overdose. Sub-analyses investigated whether these relationships were explained by drug use-related variables.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between June 2014 and March 2020, 1723 participants provided 12120 observations. At study baseline, 1074 (62.3%) were men and 649 (37.7%) were women. In RMLCA, five distinct profiles of socioeconomic exposures emerged for men, and four emerged for women. Classes were presented in ascending order of socioeconomic disadvantage (i.e., ranging from Class 1 [least disadvantage] to Class 4/Class 5 [most disadvantage]) and were primarily distinguished by variations in income, material and housing in/security, participation in illegal/informal income generation, and criminal justice involvement. In analyses adjusting for demographic characteristics, for both men and women, progressive increases in exposure to multiple dimensions of disadvantage were positively and independently associated with non-fatal overdose when compared to the least socioeconomically disadvantaged subgroup. Subsequent analyses revealed that systematic differences in drug use patterns and behaviours across categories of socioeconomic disadvantage largely accounted for these relationships.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Addressing multiple forms of mutually reinforcing health inequities may offer additional opportunity to mitigate non-fatal overdose in men and women who use drugs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"366 ","pages":"Article 117661"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624011158","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

While marked gender-based differences in drug-related risk and harm between men women who use drugs have been characterized to some extent, the complex relationship between gendered socioeconomic conditions, overdose risk, and drug use patterns and behaviours remains underexplored.

Methods

We conducted gender-stratified repeated measures latent class analyses (RMLCA) with data from two ongoing cohorts of people who use drugs in Vancouver, Canada to identify discrete subgroups based on socioeconomic exposures. Multivariable generalized estimating equations models weighted by the respective posterior membership probabilities were applied to estimate the associations between socioeconomic class membership and non-fatal overdose. Sub-analyses investigated whether these relationships were explained by drug use-related variables.

Results

Between June 2014 and March 2020, 1723 participants provided 12120 observations. At study baseline, 1074 (62.3%) were men and 649 (37.7%) were women. In RMLCA, five distinct profiles of socioeconomic exposures emerged for men, and four emerged for women. Classes were presented in ascending order of socioeconomic disadvantage (i.e., ranging from Class 1 [least disadvantage] to Class 4/Class 5 [most disadvantage]) and were primarily distinguished by variations in income, material and housing in/security, participation in illegal/informal income generation, and criminal justice involvement. In analyses adjusting for demographic characteristics, for both men and women, progressive increases in exposure to multiple dimensions of disadvantage were positively and independently associated with non-fatal overdose when compared to the least socioeconomically disadvantaged subgroup. Subsequent analyses revealed that systematic differences in drug use patterns and behaviours across categories of socioeconomic disadvantage largely accounted for these relationships.

Conclusions

Addressing multiple forms of mutually reinforcing health inequities may offer additional opportunity to mitigate non-fatal overdose in men and women who use drugs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
吸毒者中社会经济边缘化和非致命过量的模式:一种性别分层重复测量潜在类分析。
背景:虽然在某种程度上已经确定了男性和女性吸毒者在药物相关风险和伤害方面的显著性别差异,但性别社会经济条件、过量风险和药物使用模式和行为之间的复杂关系仍未得到充分探讨。方法:我们对加拿大温哥华两个正在进行的药物使用人群的数据进行了性别分层重复测量潜在类分析(RMLCA),以确定基于社会经济暴露的离散亚组。应用由各自的后验隶属度概率加权的多变量广义估计方程模型来估计社会经济阶层隶属度与非致命性过量用药之间的关系。亚分析调查了这些关系是否可以用药物使用相关变量来解释。结果:2014年6月至2020年3月期间,1723名参与者提供了12120项观察结果。在研究基线时,男性为1074例(62.3%),女性为649例(37.7%)。在RMLCA中,男性出现了五种不同的社会经济暴露概况,女性出现了四种。阶级按社会经济劣势的升序呈现(即从1级[最低劣势]到4级/ 5级[最劣势]),并主要通过收入、物质和住房/安全、参与非法/非正式创收和刑事司法参与等方面的差异来区分。在调整人口统计学特征的分析中,对于男性和女性来说,与社会经济上最不利的亚组相比,暴露于多种不利因素的逐渐增加与非致命性药物过量呈正相关且独立相关。随后的分析显示,不同社会经济劣势类别的药物使用模式和行为的系统性差异在很大程度上解释了这些关系。结论:解决多种形式的相互加强的卫生不公平现象,可能会为减少男性和女性药物使用者的非致命性过量提供更多机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
期刊最新文献
A biopsychosocial approach towards understanding disparities in exercise participation between Hispanic and non-Hispanic White patients living with knee osteoarthritis Ontological pleasure: Exploring eating as enjoyment among people with experience of homelessness Overcoming the “valleys of death” in advanced therapies: The role of finance Who bears the distance cost of public primary healthcare? Hypertension among the elderly in rural India Association of low employment quality with cigarette smoking, smoking initiation, and smoking cessation: A 16-year longitudinal study in South Korea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1