Patterns of socioeconomic marginalization and non-fatal overdose among people who use drugs: A gender-stratified repeated measures latent class analysis
Sanjana Mitra , Lindsey Richardson , Zishan Cui , Mark Gilbert , M.-J. Milloy , Kanna Hayashi , Thomas Kerr
{"title":"Patterns of socioeconomic marginalization and non-fatal overdose among people who use drugs: A gender-stratified repeated measures latent class analysis","authors":"Sanjana Mitra , Lindsey Richardson , Zishan Cui , Mark Gilbert , M.-J. Milloy , Kanna Hayashi , Thomas Kerr","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>While marked gender-based differences in drug-related risk and harm between men women who use drugs have been characterized to some extent, the complex relationship between gendered socioeconomic conditions, overdose risk, and drug use patterns and behaviours remains underexplored.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted gender-stratified repeated measures latent class analyses (RMLCA) with data from two ongoing cohorts of people who use drugs in Vancouver, Canada to identify discrete subgroups based on socioeconomic exposures. Multivariable generalized estimating equations models weighted by the respective posterior membership probabilities were applied to estimate the associations between socioeconomic class membership and non-fatal overdose. Sub-analyses investigated whether these relationships were explained by drug use-related variables.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between June 2014 and March 2020, 1723 participants provided 12120 observations. At study baseline, 1074 (62.3%) were men and 649 (37.7%) were women. In RMLCA, five distinct profiles of socioeconomic exposures emerged for men, and four emerged for women. Classes were presented in ascending order of socioeconomic disadvantage (i.e., ranging from Class 1 [least disadvantage] to Class 4/Class 5 [most disadvantage]) and were primarily distinguished by variations in income, material and housing in/security, participation in illegal/informal income generation, and criminal justice involvement. In analyses adjusting for demographic characteristics, for both men and women, progressive increases in exposure to multiple dimensions of disadvantage were positively and independently associated with non-fatal overdose when compared to the least socioeconomically disadvantaged subgroup. Subsequent analyses revealed that systematic differences in drug use patterns and behaviours across categories of socioeconomic disadvantage largely accounted for these relationships.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Addressing multiple forms of mutually reinforcing health inequities may offer additional opportunity to mitigate non-fatal overdose in men and women who use drugs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"366 ","pages":"Article 117661"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624011158","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
While marked gender-based differences in drug-related risk and harm between men women who use drugs have been characterized to some extent, the complex relationship between gendered socioeconomic conditions, overdose risk, and drug use patterns and behaviours remains underexplored.
Methods
We conducted gender-stratified repeated measures latent class analyses (RMLCA) with data from two ongoing cohorts of people who use drugs in Vancouver, Canada to identify discrete subgroups based on socioeconomic exposures. Multivariable generalized estimating equations models weighted by the respective posterior membership probabilities were applied to estimate the associations between socioeconomic class membership and non-fatal overdose. Sub-analyses investigated whether these relationships were explained by drug use-related variables.
Results
Between June 2014 and March 2020, 1723 participants provided 12120 observations. At study baseline, 1074 (62.3%) were men and 649 (37.7%) were women. In RMLCA, five distinct profiles of socioeconomic exposures emerged for men, and four emerged for women. Classes were presented in ascending order of socioeconomic disadvantage (i.e., ranging from Class 1 [least disadvantage] to Class 4/Class 5 [most disadvantage]) and were primarily distinguished by variations in income, material and housing in/security, participation in illegal/informal income generation, and criminal justice involvement. In analyses adjusting for demographic characteristics, for both men and women, progressive increases in exposure to multiple dimensions of disadvantage were positively and independently associated with non-fatal overdose when compared to the least socioeconomically disadvantaged subgroup. Subsequent analyses revealed that systematic differences in drug use patterns and behaviours across categories of socioeconomic disadvantage largely accounted for these relationships.
Conclusions
Addressing multiple forms of mutually reinforcing health inequities may offer additional opportunity to mitigate non-fatal overdose in men and women who use drugs.
期刊介绍:
Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.