Miriam C Boesch, M Alexandra Da Fonte, Gillian C Neff, Kaitlyn R Shaw, Liann L Mathew, Jennifer F Lipof
{"title":"Supporting students with complex communication needs: special education teachers' reflections on their training.","authors":"Miriam C Boesch, M Alexandra Da Fonte, Gillian C Neff, Kaitlyn R Shaw, Liann L Mathew, Jennifer F Lipof","doi":"10.1080/07434618.2024.2440764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Special education teachers support students with complex communication needs across the day. Yet, evidence suggests that these professionals are entering the field without being fully prepared to support these students by having the knowledge and skill to implement augmentative and alternative communication practices. The lack of preparedness from these professionals creates barriers for students with complex communication needs, their families, and other team members. To gather information from special education teachers' point of view, a nationwide survey was disseminated with the purpose of identifying the most beneficial component of their training to support students with complex communication needs. Five themes were identified from the views of 792 special education teachers, with the most beneficial components of their training consisting of 'access to content,' followed by 'opportunities to practice.' Recommendations, practical implications, and future research directions are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":49234,"journal":{"name":"Augmentative and Alternative Communication","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Augmentative and Alternative Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2024.2440764","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Special education teachers support students with complex communication needs across the day. Yet, evidence suggests that these professionals are entering the field without being fully prepared to support these students by having the knowledge and skill to implement augmentative and alternative communication practices. The lack of preparedness from these professionals creates barriers for students with complex communication needs, their families, and other team members. To gather information from special education teachers' point of view, a nationwide survey was disseminated with the purpose of identifying the most beneficial component of their training to support students with complex communication needs. Five themes were identified from the views of 792 special education teachers, with the most beneficial components of their training consisting of 'access to content,' followed by 'opportunities to practice.' Recommendations, practical implications, and future research directions are discussed.
期刊介绍:
As the official journal of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (ISAAC), Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) publishes scientific articles related to the field of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) that report research concerning assessment, treatment, rehabilitation, and education of people who use or have the potential to use AAC systems; or that discuss theory, technology, and systems development relevant to AAC. The broad range of topic included in the Journal reflects the development of this field internationally. Manuscripts submitted to AAC should fall within one of the following categories, AND MUST COMPLY with associated page maximums listed on page 3 of the Manuscript Preparation Guide.
Research articles (full peer review), These manuscripts report the results of original empirical research, including studies using qualitative and quantitative methodologies, with both group and single-case experimental research designs (e.g, Binger et al., 2008; Petroi et al., 2014).
Technical, research, and intervention notes (full peer review): These are brief manuscripts that address methodological, statistical, technical, or clinical issues or innovations that are of relevance to the AAC community and are designed to bring the research community’s attention to areas that have been minimally or poorly researched in the past (e.g., research note: Thunberg et al., 2016; intervention notes: Laubscher et al., 2019).