Simulated Patient as a Learner: Medical Volunteers Gain Knowledge by Participating in a Wilderness Medicine Training Session.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Wilderness & Environmental Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-19 DOI:10.1177/10806032251313961
Geoffrey Comp, Michael Foggia, Cody Blentlinger, Bikash Bhattarai, Cornel Popescu, Andrea Ferrari
{"title":"Simulated Patient as a Learner: Medical Volunteers Gain Knowledge by Participating in a Wilderness Medicine Training Session.","authors":"Geoffrey Comp, Michael Foggia, Cody Blentlinger, Bikash Bhattarai, Cornel Popescu, Andrea Ferrari","doi":"10.1177/10806032251313961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>-A multifaceted approach to wilderness medicine education and training is necessary to provide a high-quality learning experience, often requiring innovative instructional techniques. Using volunteers to act as patients in medical education is a well-established practice that helps teach crucial skills. However, more is needed to know if there is potential knowledge acquisition through participation. This study examined the educational benefits for medical students serving as a simulated patient (SP), hypothesizing that these individuals will improve self-assessed knowledge and confidence and demonstrate improved performance of injury-management skills while participating in a medical education course.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>-A descriptive feasibility pilot study was conducted with 10 SPs to assess knowledge and skill acquisition. Study participants were evaluated before and after participating as an SP in 2 scenarios involving hemorrhage control and wrist injury assessment and management, with a subjective confidence survey and an objective skill and knowledge demonstration, as measured by a critical action checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>-The subjects all reported self-assessed knowledge improvement from the pre- to postintervention survey, with an average increase of 17 points. They also demonstrated improved objective skill and knowledge demonstration, with an average increase of 4.6 points for the wrist injury scenario and 2.5 points for the hemorrhage control scenario.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>-This study demonstrated that volunteer medical students acting as SPs in a medical training course passively acquire knowledge and improve their medical skills and self-perceived confidence. The findings contribute to a broader understanding of medical education, suggesting that participating as SPs offers educational benefits. The results encourage consideration of simulated patient roles as a valuable adjunct to medical education, warranting further scholarly exploration to substantiate and expand on these preliminary findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":49360,"journal":{"name":"Wilderness & Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"10806032251313961"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wilderness & Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10806032251313961","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: -A multifaceted approach to wilderness medicine education and training is necessary to provide a high-quality learning experience, often requiring innovative instructional techniques. Using volunteers to act as patients in medical education is a well-established practice that helps teach crucial skills. However, more is needed to know if there is potential knowledge acquisition through participation. This study examined the educational benefits for medical students serving as a simulated patient (SP), hypothesizing that these individuals will improve self-assessed knowledge and confidence and demonstrate improved performance of injury-management skills while participating in a medical education course.

Methods: -A descriptive feasibility pilot study was conducted with 10 SPs to assess knowledge and skill acquisition. Study participants were evaluated before and after participating as an SP in 2 scenarios involving hemorrhage control and wrist injury assessment and management, with a subjective confidence survey and an objective skill and knowledge demonstration, as measured by a critical action checklist.

Results: -The subjects all reported self-assessed knowledge improvement from the pre- to postintervention survey, with an average increase of 17 points. They also demonstrated improved objective skill and knowledge demonstration, with an average increase of 4.6 points for the wrist injury scenario and 2.5 points for the hemorrhage control scenario.

Conclusions: -This study demonstrated that volunteer medical students acting as SPs in a medical training course passively acquire knowledge and improve their medical skills and self-perceived confidence. The findings contribute to a broader understanding of medical education, suggesting that participating as SPs offers educational benefits. The results encourage consideration of simulated patient roles as a valuable adjunct to medical education, warranting further scholarly exploration to substantiate and expand on these preliminary findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模拟病人作为学习者:医疗志愿者通过参加野外医学培训课程获得知识。
前言:要提供高质量的学习体验,必须采用多方面的野外医学教育和培训方法,这通常需要创新的教学技术。在医学教育中,让志愿者充当病人是一种行之有效的做法,有助于教授关键技能。然而,需要更多的了解是否有潜在的知识获取通过参与。本研究考察了医学生作为模拟病人(SP)的教育效益,假设这些人在参加医学教育课程时会提高自我评估的知识和信心,并表现出更好的伤害管理技能。方法:采用描述性可行性试点研究,对10名SPs进行知识和技能获取评估。研究参与者作为SP参与出血控制和手腕损伤评估与管理两种场景的前后进行评估,主观信心调查和客观技能和知识演示,由关键行动清单测量。结果:-受试者均报告自评知识从干预前到干预后有所改善,平均提高17分。他们还表现出客观技能和知识演示的提高,手腕损伤情景平均提高4.6分,出血控制情景平均提高2.5分。结论:-本研究证明志愿医学生在医学培训课程中作为SPs被动地获得了知识,提高了他们的医疗技能和自我感知信心。这些发现有助于更广泛地理解医学教育,表明作为SPs参与医学教育有教育上的好处。结果鼓励考虑模拟病人的角色作为一个有价值的辅助医学教育,保证进一步的学术探索,以证实和扩大这些初步发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Wilderness & Environmental Medicine
Wilderness & Environmental Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
96
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Wilderness & Environmental Medicine, the official journal of the Wilderness Medical Society, is the leading journal for physicians practicing medicine in austere environments. This quarterly journal features articles on all aspects of wilderness medicine, including high altitude and climbing, cold- and heat-related phenomena, natural environmental disasters, immersion and near-drowning, diving, and barotrauma, hazardous plants/animals/insects/marine animals, animal attacks, search and rescue, ethical and legal issues, aeromedial transport, survival physiology, medicine in remote environments, travel medicine, operational medicine, and wilderness trauma management. It presents original research and clinical reports from scientists and practitioners around the globe. WEM invites submissions from authors who want to take advantage of our established publication''s unique scope, wide readership, and international recognition in the field of wilderness medicine. Its readership is a diverse group of medical and outdoor professionals who choose WEM as their primary wilderness medical resource.
期刊最新文献
Development of Progressively Earth-Independent Medical Operations to Enable NASA Exploration Missions. Suspected Stonefish Envenomation in Reunion Island: 15 Years Later. Attacks on Humans by Neotropical Otters. Case Report of a Traumatic Arthrotomy of the Knee Diagnosed by Ultrasound. Simulated Patient as a Learner: Medical Volunteers Gain Knowledge by Participating in a Wilderness Medicine Training Session.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1