{"title":"Suspected Stonefish Envenomation in Reunion Island: 15 Years Later.","authors":"Louis Renson, François Maillet, Corentin Bonnet","doi":"10.1177/10806032241308477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although marine envenomations are a reason for consultation in tropical emergency departments, stonefish stings are particularly feared. Immediate management focuses on pain control, whereas late management addresses cutaneous complications. This study presents a new series and compares the management of these patients and their outcomes at our center over the past 20 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study presents a new series of 53 patients treated between 2016 and 2020 at the South Hospital of the University Hospital Center of Réunion following a sting attributed to the stonefish. We compared this new series with a previous series of patients treated at the same center for the same reason between 2001 and 2005.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The series are comparable. Regarding early management, the use of regional anesthesia was more frequent (47 vs 3.5%). Half the patients received a strong opioid. Prescription of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and corticosteroids persisted. Exposure to a heat source remained common. Prophylactic antibiotics were prescribed more frequently (64 vs 35%) and more uniformly with amoxicillin/clavulanate. Regarding late management, the average duration of hospitalization decreased (1.8 vs 2.6 d). Cutaneous complications were less frequent (9 vs 25%). No patient managed with regional anesthesia presented cutaneous complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The management of patients in Réunion following Scorpaenidae stings has evolved over time. Regional anesthesia has become more widespread, and the prescription of probabilistic preventive antibiotic therapy is more homogeneous. These changes are associated with a shorter hospital stay and fewer cutaneous complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":49360,"journal":{"name":"Wilderness & Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"10806032241308477"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wilderness & Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10806032241308477","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Although marine envenomations are a reason for consultation in tropical emergency departments, stonefish stings are particularly feared. Immediate management focuses on pain control, whereas late management addresses cutaneous complications. This study presents a new series and compares the management of these patients and their outcomes at our center over the past 20 years.
Methods: This study presents a new series of 53 patients treated between 2016 and 2020 at the South Hospital of the University Hospital Center of Réunion following a sting attributed to the stonefish. We compared this new series with a previous series of patients treated at the same center for the same reason between 2001 and 2005.
Results: The series are comparable. Regarding early management, the use of regional anesthesia was more frequent (47 vs 3.5%). Half the patients received a strong opioid. Prescription of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and corticosteroids persisted. Exposure to a heat source remained common. Prophylactic antibiotics were prescribed more frequently (64 vs 35%) and more uniformly with amoxicillin/clavulanate. Regarding late management, the average duration of hospitalization decreased (1.8 vs 2.6 d). Cutaneous complications were less frequent (9 vs 25%). No patient managed with regional anesthesia presented cutaneous complications.
Conclusions: The management of patients in Réunion following Scorpaenidae stings has evolved over time. Regional anesthesia has become more widespread, and the prescription of probabilistic preventive antibiotic therapy is more homogeneous. These changes are associated with a shorter hospital stay and fewer cutaneous complications.
导言:虽然海洋中毒是热带急诊科求诊的一个原因,但石鱼蜇伤是特别可怕的。立即处理的重点是疼痛控制,而后期处理解决皮肤并发症。本研究提出了一个新的系列,并比较了过去20年来我中心对这些患者的管理和他们的结果。方法:本研究介绍了2016年至2020年期间在r大学医院中心南医院接受治疗的53名患者,他们被石鱼蜇伤。我们将这个新系列与2001年至2005年间在同一中心因同样原因接受治疗的先前系列患者进行了比较。结果:该系列具有可比性。在早期处理方面,区域麻醉的使用更为频繁(47% vs 3.5%)。一半的病人服用了强效阿片类药物。非甾体抗炎药和皮质类固醇处方持续存在。暴露在热源下仍然很常见。预防性抗生素的使用频率更高(64% vs 35%),阿莫西林/克拉维酸更均匀。在后期治疗方面,平均住院时间缩短(1.8天vs 2.6天),皮肤并发症发生率降低(9天vs 25%)。无区域麻醉患者出现皮肤并发症。结论:随着时间的推移,对Scorpaenidae蜇伤患者的处理也在不断发展。区域麻醉已经变得更加普遍,概率预防性抗生素治疗的处方更加均匀。这些变化与较短的住院时间和较少的皮肤并发症有关。
期刊介绍:
Wilderness & Environmental Medicine, the official journal of the Wilderness Medical Society, is the leading journal for physicians practicing medicine in austere environments. This quarterly journal features articles on all aspects of wilderness medicine, including high altitude and climbing, cold- and heat-related phenomena, natural environmental disasters, immersion and near-drowning, diving, and barotrauma, hazardous plants/animals/insects/marine animals, animal attacks, search and rescue, ethical and legal issues, aeromedial transport, survival physiology, medicine in remote environments, travel medicine, operational medicine, and wilderness trauma management. It presents original research and clinical reports from scientists and practitioners around the globe. WEM invites submissions from authors who want to take advantage of our established publication''s unique scope, wide readership, and international recognition in the field of wilderness medicine. Its readership is a diverse group of medical and outdoor professionals who choose WEM as their primary wilderness medical resource.