A comparison of the treatment outcomes of cerebral gas embolism at 2.8 ATA in comparison with 6 ATA.

IF 0.7 4区医学 Q4 MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine Pub Date : 2024-04-01

Bin Zhang, Hongjie Yi, Yue Jiang, Chenggang Zheng

{"title":"A comparison of the treatment outcomes of cerebral gas embolism at 2.8 ATA in comparison with 6 ATA.","authors":"Bin Zhang, Hongjie Yi, Yue Jiang, Chenggang Zheng","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To investigate the effect of 6 ATA air/ oxygen treatment scheme and 2.8 ATA oxygen inhalation scheme on cerebral gas embolism.Methods: 29 patients with cerebral gas embolism admitted from January 2014 to June 2022 were retrospectively included. The patients were divided into 6 ATA air/ oxygen treatment scheme group (14 cases) and 2.8 ATA oxygen inhalation therapy scheme group (15 cases). Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) was used to evaluate the therapeutic effect before and after treatment. The effective standard of treatment: recovery of consciousness (GCS scores>8).Results: There was no significant difference between two groups in terms of gender, age, cause of disease, time of onset and GCS score before treatment (P>0.05). There was not significant difference between two groups in terms of GCS score after 1 day and 1 week of treatment (P>0.05). After 1 week of treatment, 78.6% (11/14) of patients in the 6 ATA group and 80.0% (12/15) in the 2.8 ATA group improved.Conclusion: The 2.8 ATA oxygen inhalation scheme can effectively treat cerebral gas embolism, and effect is similar to the 6 ATA air/ oxygen treatment scheme.","PeriodicalId":49396,"journal":{"name":"Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine","volume":"51 4","pages":"341-346"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effect of 6 ATA air/ oxygen treatment scheme and 2.8 ATA oxygen inhalation scheme on cerebral gas embolism.

Methods: 29 patients with cerebral gas embolism admitted from January 2014 to June 2022 were retrospectively included. The patients were divided into 6 ATA air/ oxygen treatment scheme group (14 cases) and 2.8 ATA oxygen inhalation therapy scheme group (15 cases). Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) was used to evaluate the therapeutic effect before and after treatment. The effective standard of treatment: recovery of consciousness (GCS scores>8).

Results: There was no significant difference between two groups in terms of gender, age, cause of disease, time of onset and GCS score before treatment (P>0.05). There was not significant difference between two groups in terms of GCS score after 1 day and 1 week of treatment (P>0.05). After 1 week of treatment, 78.6% (11/14) of patients in the 6 ATA group and 80.0% (12/15) in the 2.8 ATA group improved.

Conclusion: The 2.8 ATA oxygen inhalation scheme can effectively treat cerebral gas embolism, and effect is similar to the 6 ATA air/ oxygen treatment scheme.

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

2.8 ATA与6 ATA脑气栓塞治疗结果的比较

目的：探讨6ata空气/氧气治疗方案和2.8 ATA吸氧方案对脑气体栓塞的治疗效果。方法：回顾性分析2014年1月至2022年6月收治的29例脑气栓塞患者。患者分为6例ATA空气/氧气治疗方案组（14例）和2.8例ATA吸氧治疗方案组（15例）。采用格拉斯哥昏迷评分（GCS）评价治疗前后疗效。有效治疗标准：意识恢复（GCS评分bb80）。结果：两组患者在性别、年龄、病因、发病时间、治疗前GCS评分方面差异均无统计学意义（P < 0.05）。两组患者治疗1 d、1周后GCS评分比较，差异无统计学意义（P < 0.05）。治疗1周后，6ata组78.6%（11/14）患者改善，2.8 ATA组80.0%（12/15）患者改善。结论：2.8 ATA吸氧方案可有效治疗脑气栓塞，效果与6 ATA空气/氧气治疗方案相近。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine 医学-海洋与淡水生物学

CiteScore

1.60

自引率

11.10%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine Journal accepts manuscripts for publication that are related to the areas of diving research and physiology, hyperbaric medicine and oxygen therapy, submarine medicine, naval medicine and clinical research related to the above topics. To be considered for UHM scientific papers must deal with significant and new research in an area related to biological, physical and clinical phenomena related to the above environments.