Mapping the Washington Group on Disability Statistics disability measure to the Health Utilities Index Mark 3: Development and validation of a predictive multivariable model in a general population sample.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health Reports Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI:10.25318/82-003-x202500100001-eng
Thomas Charters, Dafna Kohen, Julie Bernier
{"title":"Mapping the Washington Group on Disability Statistics disability measure to the Health Utilities Index Mark 3: Development and validation of a predictive multivariable model in a general population sample.","authors":"Thomas Charters, Dafna Kohen, Julie Bernier","doi":"10.25318/82-003-x202500100001-eng","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Statistics Canada routinely collects information on functional health and related concepts. Recently, the Washington Group on Disability Statistics (WG) measure of disability has been introduced to the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS). The WG measure is used as a tool for developing internationally comparable data on disability. In alternate cycles of the CCHS, it replaces the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3), a generic preference-based measure of health-related quality of life. The HUI3 is used to derive evaluative health measures common in population health and economic evaluations. Since the WG measure is not preference-based, it is unable to derive these measures. To address resulting data gaps, this study empirically maps the health state utility values of the HUI3 score from the WG measure.</p><p><strong>Data and methods: </strong>Empirical mapping used a \"head-to-head\" subsample of the 2017 CCHS where WG and HUI3 measures were collected from the same respondents aged 40 and over. Empirical mapping used regression models to estimate the statistical relationship between WG and HUI3 measures in addition to health and demographic variables. Out-of-sample predictive performance was assessed through descriptive statistics, mean absolute error, and other measures of predictive accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The preferred estimation strategy resulted in reasonably precise estimates of the HUI3 score corresponding to trends across health and demographic characteristics and reflecting distributional properties of the HUI3 score. Inclusion of different components of the WG measure influenced predictive accuracy.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Empirical mapping offers a potential method to estimate health state utility scores from the WG measure and addresses data gaps in health-related quality of life measures in the CCHS when HUI3 is not collected.</p>","PeriodicalId":49196,"journal":{"name":"Health Reports","volume":"36 1","pages":"3-18"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25318/82-003-x202500100001-eng","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Statistics Canada routinely collects information on functional health and related concepts. Recently, the Washington Group on Disability Statistics (WG) measure of disability has been introduced to the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS). The WG measure is used as a tool for developing internationally comparable data on disability. In alternate cycles of the CCHS, it replaces the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3), a generic preference-based measure of health-related quality of life. The HUI3 is used to derive evaluative health measures common in population health and economic evaluations. Since the WG measure is not preference-based, it is unable to derive these measures. To address resulting data gaps, this study empirically maps the health state utility values of the HUI3 score from the WG measure.

Data and methods: Empirical mapping used a "head-to-head" subsample of the 2017 CCHS where WG and HUI3 measures were collected from the same respondents aged 40 and over. Empirical mapping used regression models to estimate the statistical relationship between WG and HUI3 measures in addition to health and demographic variables. Out-of-sample predictive performance was assessed through descriptive statistics, mean absolute error, and other measures of predictive accuracy.

Results: The preferred estimation strategy resulted in reasonably precise estimates of the HUI3 score corresponding to trends across health and demographic characteristics and reflecting distributional properties of the HUI3 score. Inclusion of different components of the WG measure influenced predictive accuracy.

Interpretation: Empirical mapping offers a potential method to estimate health state utility scores from the WG measure and addresses data gaps in health-related quality of life measures in the CCHS when HUI3 is not collected.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将华盛顿残疾统计小组的残疾措施映射到健康公用事业指数标记3:在一般人口样本中开发和验证预测多变量模型。
背景:加拿大统计局定期收集关于功能性健康和相关概念的信息。最近,在加拿大社区卫生调查中引入了华盛顿残疾统计小组的残疾衡量标准。工作组的衡量标准被用作制定国际上可比较的残疾数据的工具。在CCHS的交替周期中,它取代了健康效用指数标志3 (HUI3),这是一种基于偏好的健康相关生活质量的通用衡量标准。HUI3用于得出在人口健康和经济评价中常见的评价性健康措施。由于WG度量不是基于偏好的,因此它无法派生出这些度量。为了解决由此产生的数据差距,本研究通过经验绘制了来自WG度量的HUI3得分的健康状态效用值。数据和方法:经验映射使用了2017年CCHS的“头对头”子样本,其中WG和HUI3措施是从40岁及以上的同一受访者中收集的。经验映射使用回归模型来估计除健康和人口变量外,WG和HUI3措施之间的统计关系。通过描述性统计、平均绝对误差和其他预测准确性措施来评估样本外预测性能。结果:优选的估计策略导致对HUI3评分的合理精确估计,与健康和人口统计学特征的趋势相对应,并反映了HUI3评分的分布特性。包含WG测量的不同组成部分会影响预测准确性。解释:经验映射提供了一种潜在的方法来估计WG测量的健康状态效用得分,并解决了在未收集HUI3时CCHS中与健康相关的生活质量测量的数据缺口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Reports
Health Reports PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Health Reports publishes original research on diverse topics related to understanding and improving the health of populations and the delivery of health care. We publish studies based on analyses of Canadian national/provincial representative surveys or Canadian national/provincial administrative databases, as well as results of international comparative health research. Health Reports encourages the sharing of methodological information among those engaged in the analysis of health surveys or administrative databases. Use of the most current data available is advised for all submissions.
期刊最新文献
Are adolescents who do physical activity with their parents more active and mentally healthier? Mapping the Washington Group on Disability Statistics disability measure to the Health Utilities Index Mark 3: Development and validation of a predictive multivariable model in a general population sample. Anxiety disorders among older Canadians: Focus on Indigenous and racialized population groups. From BpTRU to OMRON: The impact of changing automated blood pressure measurement devices on blood pressure estimates among children and youth. Mental health and access to support among 2SLGBTQ+ youth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1