An International Delphi Based Study for Developing A Core Outcome Set For Hypospadias Surgery.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY Sexual Development Pub Date : 2025-01-18 DOI:10.1159/000541596
Tina L Leunbach, Francisca Yankovic, Alexander Springer, Amy Wisniewski, Berk Burgu, Luis Braga, Andreas Ernst, Angela Lucas-Herald, Stuart O'Toole, S Faisal Ahmed, Yazan F Rawashdeh
{"title":"An International Delphi Based Study for Developing A Core Outcome Set For Hypospadias Surgery.","authors":"Tina L Leunbach, Francisca Yankovic, Alexander Springer, Amy Wisniewski, Berk Burgu, Luis Braga, Andreas Ernst, Angela Lucas-Herald, Stuart O'Toole, S Faisal Ahmed, Yazan F Rawashdeh","doi":"10.1159/000541596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction Explicit outcomes routinely measured across the life span following hypospadias surgery, defined by a core outcome set (COS), will harmonize and overcome reporting heterogeneity. Methods Age specific outcomes identified in a literature review were presented in a three round Delphi survey. Participants (professionals, parents and patients) were encouraged to suggest outcomes in the first Delphi round. In subsequent rounds participants were asked to choose and rank up to five preferred outcomes for each age. To be deemed core, an outcome needed over 70% of votes in a round. Results Professionals were mainly paediatric urologists (round 1, 2, 3: n=57 (77 %), 39 (78%), 35 (81%)). The response rates from parents/patients (round 1, 2, 3: n= 17, 5, 3) were low. In young boys (<6 years, 6-10 years) four core outcomes were identical (voiding, fistula, re-operation and urethral stricture). Core outcomes in boys aged 11-16 years (cosmesis, curvature, voiding, stricture and psychosocial status) and boys >16 years (cosmesis, curvature, erection, voiding and psychosexual development) varied more. Conclusion Outcomes to include in a COS were consistent in younger boys. A larger variety was observed in older boys and reflects less clarity on relevant outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49536,"journal":{"name":"Sexual Development","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541596","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Explicit outcomes routinely measured across the life span following hypospadias surgery, defined by a core outcome set (COS), will harmonize and overcome reporting heterogeneity. Methods Age specific outcomes identified in a literature review were presented in a three round Delphi survey. Participants (professionals, parents and patients) were encouraged to suggest outcomes in the first Delphi round. In subsequent rounds participants were asked to choose and rank up to five preferred outcomes for each age. To be deemed core, an outcome needed over 70% of votes in a round. Results Professionals were mainly paediatric urologists (round 1, 2, 3: n=57 (77 %), 39 (78%), 35 (81%)). The response rates from parents/patients (round 1, 2, 3: n= 17, 5, 3) were low. In young boys (<6 years, 6-10 years) four core outcomes were identical (voiding, fistula, re-operation and urethral stricture). Core outcomes in boys aged 11-16 years (cosmesis, curvature, voiding, stricture and psychosocial status) and boys >16 years (cosmesis, curvature, erection, voiding and psychosexual development) varied more. Conclusion Outcomes to include in a COS were consistent in younger boys. A larger variety was observed in older boys and reflects less clarity on relevant outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为尿道下裂手术制定核心结果集的国际德尔菲研究。
在尿道下裂手术后的整个生命周期中,通过核心结果集(COS)来定义明确的结果,将协调并克服报告的异质性。方法在文献综述中确定的年龄特异性结果在三轮德尔菲调查中呈现。鼓励参与者(专业人士、家长和患者)在第一轮德尔菲中提出结果。在接下来的几轮中,参与者被要求为每个年龄段选择五个最喜欢的结果并进行排名。要被认为是核心,结果需要在一轮投票中获得超过70%的选票。结果专业人员主要为儿科泌尿科医师(第1、2、3轮:n=57(77%)、39(78%)、35(81%))。来自家长/患者(第1、2、3轮:n= 17、5、3)的应答率较低。在年轻男孩(16岁)(美容,曲度,勃起,排尿和性心理发展)变化更大。结论低龄男孩的COS结局一致。在年龄较大的男孩中观察到的变化更大,反映出相关结果的清晰度较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sexual Development
Sexual Development 生物-发育生物学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
25
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Recent discoveries in experimental and clinical research have led to impressive advances in our knowledge of the genetic and environmental mechanisms governing sex determination and differentiation, their evolution as well as the mutations or endocrine and metabolic abnormalities that interfere with normal gonadal development. ‘Sexual Development’ provides a unique forum for this rapidly expanding field. Its broad scope covers all aspects of genetics, molecular biology, embryology, endocrinology, evolution and pathology of sex determination and differentiation in humans and animals. It publishes high-quality original research manuscripts, review articles, short reports, case reports and commentaries. An internationally renowned and multidisciplinary editorial team of three chief editors, ten prominent scientists serving as section editors, and a distinguished panel of editorial board members ensures fast and author-friendly editorial processing and peer reviewing.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Functional Cis-regulatory Elements Reveals Novel Transcriptional Regulatory Mechanisms in Gonadal Development. An International Delphi Based Study for Developing A Core Outcome Set For Hypospadias Surgery. One-Step Leaping Evolution from an Autosomal Pair to the Heteromorphic Sex Chromosomes. Exploring Testicular Descent: Recent Findings and Future Prospects in Canine Cryptorchidism. Inhibiting p38α and -β MAPK Affects Testis Development in the Marsupial Tammar Wallaby.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1