Nurse-patient relationship boundaries and power: A critical discursive analysis.

IF 2.9 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS Nursing Ethics Pub Date : 2025-01-19 DOI:10.1177/09697330251314093
Jeanette Varpen Unhjem, Marit Helene Hem
{"title":"Nurse-patient relationship boundaries and power: A critical discursive analysis.","authors":"Jeanette Varpen Unhjem, Marit Helene Hem","doi":"10.1177/09697330251314093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Mental health nursing is dependent on nurses' ability to engage in therapeutic relationships with patients. The ability to manage professional boundaries is equally important, but less explored. This study aims to address the following research questions: How do nurses define their professional, personal, and private roles? What are nurses' experiences with professional boundaries? What are the implications of nurses' understanding of these boundaries?<b>Background:</b> Nurse-patient relationships are characterized by asymmetrical power dynamics, which places the responsibility of delineating professional boundaries on the nurse. While ethical codes offer guidance, nurses must identify appropriate boundaries in a dynamic process that relies on the clinical context.<b>Research design:</b> This study used critical discursive psychological analysis to examine data from participant observations, individual interviews, and focus group discussions.<b>Participants and research context:</b> We included 16 nurses working in mental health care in this study, comprising 12 in specialist mental health care and 4 in community mental health care.<b>Ethical considerations:</b> The study was registered with Norwegian Social Science Data Services.<b>Results:</b> Nurses defined professionalism as being an educated caregiver who prioritizes patients' needs. Professionalism involves personal engagement, while some personal matters remain private. However, nurses experienced challenges in maintaining professional boundaries, facing dilemmas due to the subjective nature of boundaries and patients' unpredictable responses.<b>Conclusions:</b> While nurses prioritize patients' needs and best interests, this study demonstrated that personal engagement is considered part of professionalism. However, nurses encounter complex dilemmas in setting professional boundaries. Additionally, these boundaries can either emphasize or de-emphasize the power differential in nurse-patient relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":49729,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"9697330251314093"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330251314093","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Mental health nursing is dependent on nurses' ability to engage in therapeutic relationships with patients. The ability to manage professional boundaries is equally important, but less explored. This study aims to address the following research questions: How do nurses define their professional, personal, and private roles? What are nurses' experiences with professional boundaries? What are the implications of nurses' understanding of these boundaries?Background: Nurse-patient relationships are characterized by asymmetrical power dynamics, which places the responsibility of delineating professional boundaries on the nurse. While ethical codes offer guidance, nurses must identify appropriate boundaries in a dynamic process that relies on the clinical context.Research design: This study used critical discursive psychological analysis to examine data from participant observations, individual interviews, and focus group discussions.Participants and research context: We included 16 nurses working in mental health care in this study, comprising 12 in specialist mental health care and 4 in community mental health care.Ethical considerations: The study was registered with Norwegian Social Science Data Services.Results: Nurses defined professionalism as being an educated caregiver who prioritizes patients' needs. Professionalism involves personal engagement, while some personal matters remain private. However, nurses experienced challenges in maintaining professional boundaries, facing dilemmas due to the subjective nature of boundaries and patients' unpredictable responses.Conclusions: While nurses prioritize patients' needs and best interests, this study demonstrated that personal engagement is considered part of professionalism. However, nurses encounter complex dilemmas in setting professional boundaries. Additionally, these boundaries can either emphasize or de-emphasize the power differential in nurse-patient relationships.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护患关系边界和权力:一个批判性的话语分析。
心理健康护理依赖于护士与患者建立治疗关系的能力。管理职业界限的能力同样重要,但很少被探索。本研究旨在解决以下研究问题:护士如何定义他们的专业,个人和私人角色?护士在职业界限方面的经验是什么?护士对这些界限的理解意味着什么?背景:护患关系的特点是不对称的权力动态,这使得护士有责任划定专业界限。虽然道德规范提供指导,护士必须在依赖于临床环境的动态过程中确定适当的边界。研究设计:本研究采用批判性话语心理学分析来检验来自参与者观察、个人访谈和焦点小组讨论的数据。研究对象和研究背景:本研究纳入了16名从事精神卫生保健工作的护士,其中12名在专科精神卫生保健工作,4名在社区精神卫生保健工作。伦理考虑:该研究已在挪威社会科学数据服务中心注册。结果:护士将专业定义为一个受过良好教育的照顾者,优先考虑患者的需求。专业涉及个人参与,而有些个人事务仍然是私人的。然而,护士在维护专业边界方面遇到了挑战,由于边界的主观性和患者不可预测的反应,护士面临着困境。结论:虽然护士优先考虑患者的需求和最佳利益,但本研究表明,个人参与被认为是专业精神的一部分。然而,护士在设置专业界限时遇到了复杂的困境。此外,这些界限可以强调或弱化护患关系中的权力差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Ethics
Nursing Ethics 医学-护理
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.90%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Ethics takes a practical approach to this complex subject and relates each topic to the working environment. The articles on ethical and legal issues are written in a comprehensible style and official documents are analysed in a user-friendly way. The international Editorial Board ensures the selection of a wide range of high quality articles of global significance.
期刊最新文献
Palliative nurses' empathic tendencies, quality of life, individualized care perceptions. Nurse-patient relationship boundaries and power: A critical discursive analysis. Blueprint of ethics content in undergraduate education: A workshop-research study. Implications of assisted dying for nursing practice. High-fidelity simulation training for improving nursing professional values acquisition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1