The Effects of Floor Isometric Trunk Extension Exercise on Muscle Thickness and Activation Vary Between Different Combinations of Duration and Repetition Number.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION Journal of Sport Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1123/jsr.2024-0054
Eleftherios Kellis, Athanasios Konstantopoulos, Athanasios Ellinoudis
{"title":"The Effects of Floor Isometric Trunk Extension Exercise on Muscle Thickness and Activation Vary Between Different Combinations of Duration and Repetition Number.","authors":"Eleftherios Kellis, Athanasios Konstantopoulos, Athanasios Ellinoudis","doi":"10.1123/jsr.2024-0054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Intermittent floor trunk extensions are popular exercises in group fitness programs. The aim of this study was to investigate whether fewer repetitions of longer isometric trunk extension efforts compared with more repetitions of shorter isometric contractions have different acute effects on muscle thickness and activation as well as perceived exertion.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study followed a cross-sectional design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty healthy young males performed floor prone trunk extension exercises using 3 different exercise protocols of repetition and duration: 10 × 5 seconds (D10 × 5), 2 × 25 seconds (D2 × 25), and 5 × 10 seconds (D5 × 10). Ultrasound multifidus thickness and rate of perceived exertion on a 10-point scale were measured immediately after each protocol. Electromyographic activation from the erector spinae, multifidus, and gluteus maximum during each protocol was measured using bipolar surface electrodes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The longer duration (D2 × 25) protocol showed a significant greater rate of perceived exertion (6.22 [0.73]) and rest multifidus thickness change (median: 8.04%) compared with the other protocols (P < .05). Within each protocol, root mean square of all muscles increased from trial to trial in the D2 × 25 and D5 × 10 (P < .05), but not during the D10 × 5 protocol (P > .05). The maximum root mean square was achieved in the shorter duration (D10 × 5) protocol compared with the other ones (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>If trunk extension exercises on the floor are used in a training setting, then using exercises with long duration and fewer repetitions may elicit a greater metabolic response.</p>","PeriodicalId":50041,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2024-0054","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Intermittent floor trunk extensions are popular exercises in group fitness programs. The aim of this study was to investigate whether fewer repetitions of longer isometric trunk extension efforts compared with more repetitions of shorter isometric contractions have different acute effects on muscle thickness and activation as well as perceived exertion.

Design: This study followed a cross-sectional design.

Methods: Twenty healthy young males performed floor prone trunk extension exercises using 3 different exercise protocols of repetition and duration: 10 × 5 seconds (D10 × 5), 2 × 25 seconds (D2 × 25), and 5 × 10 seconds (D5 × 10). Ultrasound multifidus thickness and rate of perceived exertion on a 10-point scale were measured immediately after each protocol. Electromyographic activation from the erector spinae, multifidus, and gluteus maximum during each protocol was measured using bipolar surface electrodes.

Results: The longer duration (D2 × 25) protocol showed a significant greater rate of perceived exertion (6.22 [0.73]) and rest multifidus thickness change (median: 8.04%) compared with the other protocols (P < .05). Within each protocol, root mean square of all muscles increased from trial to trial in the D2 × 25 and D5 × 10 (P < .05), but not during the D10 × 5 protocol (P > .05). The maximum root mean square was achieved in the shorter duration (D10 × 5) protocol compared with the other ones (P < .05).

Conclusion: If trunk extension exercises on the floor are used in a training setting, then using exercises with long duration and fewer repetitions may elicit a greater metabolic response.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地板等长躯干伸展运动对肌肉厚度和激活的影响在不同的持续时间和重复次数组合中有所不同。
背景:间歇地板躯干伸展是团体健身项目中流行的运动。本研究的目的是探讨较短的等距收缩与较短的等距收缩相比,较短的等距收缩与较短的等距收缩相比,较短的等距伸展是否对肌肉厚度和激活有不同的急性影响。设计:本研究采用横断面设计。方法:20名健康青年男性采用3种不同的重复和持续时间:10 × 5秒(D10 × 5)、2 × 25秒(D2 × 25)和5 × 10秒(D5 × 10)进行地板俯卧躯干伸展练习。每次治疗后立即测量超声多裂肌厚度和感知用力率(10分制)。使用双极表面电极测量每个方案中竖脊肌、多裂肌和臀大肌的肌电激活。结果:较长时间(D2 × 25)方案与其他方案相比,感知劳累率(6.22[0.73])和休息时多裂肌厚度变化(中位数:8.04%)显著高于其他方案(P < 0.05)。在每个方案中,D2 × 25和D5 × 10组所有肌肉的均方根均随试验而增加(P < 0.05),但在D10 × 5方案中没有增加(P < 0.05)。与其他方案相比,时间较短的方案(D10 × 5)获得最大均方根(P < 0.05)。结论:如果在训练中使用地板上的躯干伸展练习,那么使用长时间和较少重复的练习可能会引起更大的代谢反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
143
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sport Rehabilitation (JSR) is your source for the latest peer-reviewed research in the field of sport rehabilitation. All members of the sports-medicine team will benefit from the wealth of important information in each issue. JSR is completely devoted to the rehabilitation of sport and exercise injuries, regardless of the age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status of the participant. JSR publishes peer-reviewed original research, systematic reviews/meta-analyses, critically appraised topics (CATs), case studies/series, and technical reports that directly affect the management and rehabilitation of injuries incurred during sport-related activities, irrespective of the individual’s age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status. The journal is intended to provide an international, multidisciplinary forum to serve the needs of all members of the sports medicine team, including athletic trainers/therapists, sport physical therapists/physiotherapists, sports medicine physicians, and other health care and medical professionals.
期刊最新文献
Minimizing Running Load via Gentle Heel Strike Techniques: A Gait Modification Study. Treatment Order and Retention of Self-Myofascial Release and Static Stretching on Passive Hip Flexion Range of Motion. Comparing Nerve Versus Muscle Wide-Pulse High-Frequency Electrical Stimulation for Maximal and Submaximal Efforts. Effects of Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Individuals With Lateral Elbow Pain: A Randomized Single-Blind Clinical Trial. Persian Version of the Modified Constant Score in Overhead Athletes: A Reliability and Validation Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1