The BEnefit of LONGitudinal Micro-Incisions Prior to Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty (BELONG Study) in Patients With Lower Extremity Arterial Disease: Clinical Outcomes at 12 Months.

IF 1.7 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Endovascular Therapy Pub Date : 2025-01-18 DOI:10.1177/15266028241312346
Adeline Demierre, Kaliska Pedrazzoli, Daniel Hayoz, Rolf P Engelberger, Daniel Périard
{"title":"The BEnefit of LONGitudinal Micro-Incisions Prior to Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty (BELONG Study) in Patients With Lower Extremity Arterial Disease: Clinical Outcomes at 12 Months.","authors":"Adeline Demierre, Kaliska Pedrazzoli, Daniel Hayoz, Rolf P Engelberger, Daniel Périard","doi":"10.1177/15266028241312346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Angioplasty of lower extremity arteries with calcification may result in flow-limiting dissection requiring bail-out stenting with unfavorable long-term outcomes. Vessel preparation prior to angioplasty may improve immediate results of the angioplasty and long-term patency. This prospective study assessed the 12-month outcomes of patients who underwent novel vessel preparation catheter, the FLEX Vessel Prep™ System (FLEX VP), prior to drug-coated balloon angioplasty (DCB-PTA).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This investigator-initiated single-arm prospective trial enrolled patients with symptomatic lower extremity peripheral artery disease with de novo, restenotic, or in-stent stenosis of the superficial femoral or popliteal arteries. Target lesions were prepared using FLEX VP that created 12 longitudinal micro-incisions before drug-coated balloon angioplasty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-three lesions in 41 patients were treated in this study with an average lesion length of 118 mm (10-291 mm), average stenosis of 82% (40-100%), and an occlusion rate of 27.9% with an average occlusion length of 89 mm (10-272 mm). Calcification was observed in 85.7% of the lesions, with 66.7% of lesions demonstrating grade 3 or 4 of the Peripheral Arterial Calcification Scoring System. After FLEX VP and DCB-PTA, 92.7% of patients were absent of flow-limiting dissections. Stenting occurred in 39% (16/41) patients (median stent length 40 mm) for residual stenosis (15 patients) and flow-limiting dissection (1 patient). There was one death prior to the 12-month follow-up, not related to the index procedure. Freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization at 12 months was 97.5% (39/40). Rutherford classification shifted from 41.5% Class ≥3 at baseline to 95% Class ≤1 at 12 months. There were no amputations at 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Vessel preparation with longitudinal micro-incisions of complex and calcified lesions prior to angioplasty was associated with few flow-limiting dissections. The majority of stents were placed to treat focal residual stenosis, using the shortest available stent length at the time of the study (40 mm) for the majority. Only one stent was needed to treat a flow-limiting dissection. The 97.5% freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CDTLR) and symptom relief at 12 months suggest that vessel preparation via FLEX VP provides value in maintaining long-term outcomes in patients with highly calcified superficial femoral artery (SFA) or popliteal lesions.</p><p><strong>Clinical impact: </strong>Vessel preparation with longitudinal micro-incisions is a short and efficient intervention associated with promising clinical outcomes and patency rate 12 months after treatment of long and calcified occlusions or stenosis of the femoral and popliteal arteries. This innovative vessel preparation provides post-procedure less residual stenosis and more favorable dissection morphology, decreasing the placement of stent and especially their length. Vessel preparation by longitudinal incisions also favors optimal distribution of anti-restenotic drug in the lesion and thus prevents further intervention due to restenosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028241312346"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028241312346","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Angioplasty of lower extremity arteries with calcification may result in flow-limiting dissection requiring bail-out stenting with unfavorable long-term outcomes. Vessel preparation prior to angioplasty may improve immediate results of the angioplasty and long-term patency. This prospective study assessed the 12-month outcomes of patients who underwent novel vessel preparation catheter, the FLEX Vessel Prep™ System (FLEX VP), prior to drug-coated balloon angioplasty (DCB-PTA).

Materials and methods: This investigator-initiated single-arm prospective trial enrolled patients with symptomatic lower extremity peripheral artery disease with de novo, restenotic, or in-stent stenosis of the superficial femoral or popliteal arteries. Target lesions were prepared using FLEX VP that created 12 longitudinal micro-incisions before drug-coated balloon angioplasty.

Results: Forty-three lesions in 41 patients were treated in this study with an average lesion length of 118 mm (10-291 mm), average stenosis of 82% (40-100%), and an occlusion rate of 27.9% with an average occlusion length of 89 mm (10-272 mm). Calcification was observed in 85.7% of the lesions, with 66.7% of lesions demonstrating grade 3 or 4 of the Peripheral Arterial Calcification Scoring System. After FLEX VP and DCB-PTA, 92.7% of patients were absent of flow-limiting dissections. Stenting occurred in 39% (16/41) patients (median stent length 40 mm) for residual stenosis (15 patients) and flow-limiting dissection (1 patient). There was one death prior to the 12-month follow-up, not related to the index procedure. Freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization at 12 months was 97.5% (39/40). Rutherford classification shifted from 41.5% Class ≥3 at baseline to 95% Class ≤1 at 12 months. There were no amputations at 12 months.

Conclusion: Vessel preparation with longitudinal micro-incisions of complex and calcified lesions prior to angioplasty was associated with few flow-limiting dissections. The majority of stents were placed to treat focal residual stenosis, using the shortest available stent length at the time of the study (40 mm) for the majority. Only one stent was needed to treat a flow-limiting dissection. The 97.5% freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CDTLR) and symptom relief at 12 months suggest that vessel preparation via FLEX VP provides value in maintaining long-term outcomes in patients with highly calcified superficial femoral artery (SFA) or popliteal lesions.

Clinical impact: Vessel preparation with longitudinal micro-incisions is a short and efficient intervention associated with promising clinical outcomes and patency rate 12 months after treatment of long and calcified occlusions or stenosis of the femoral and popliteal arteries. This innovative vessel preparation provides post-procedure less residual stenosis and more favorable dissection morphology, decreasing the placement of stent and especially their length. Vessel preparation by longitudinal incisions also favors optimal distribution of anti-restenotic drug in the lesion and thus prevents further intervention due to restenosis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纵向微切口在紫杉醇包被球囊血管成形术前的益处(BELONG研究):下肢动脉疾病患者12个月的临床结果
目的:下肢动脉钙化血管成形术可能导致血流受限夹层,需要置入术,长期预后不利。血管成形术前的血管准备可以改善血管成形术的即时效果和长期通畅。这项前瞻性研究评估了在药物包被球囊血管成形术(DCB-PTA)之前接受新型血管准备导管FLEX血管准备™系统(FLEX VP)的患者12个月的结果。材料和方法:这项由研究者发起的单臂前瞻性试验纳入了伴有新生、再狭窄或支架内股浅动脉或腘动脉狭窄的有症状的下肢外周动脉疾病患者。在药物包被球囊血管成形术之前,使用FLEX VP制备了12个纵向微切口的靶病变。结果:本研究共治疗41例患者43个病变,平均病变长度为118 mm (10-291 mm),平均狭窄率为82%(40-100%),平均闭塞长度为89 mm (10-272 mm),闭塞率为27.9%。85.7%的病变出现钙化,其中66.7%的病变表现为外周动脉钙化评分系统3级或4级。经FLEX VP和DCB-PTA治疗后,92.7%的患者未出现限流性夹层。39%(16/41)的患者(支架中位长度40 mm)因残留狭窄(15例)和限流夹层(1例)植入支架。12个月随访前有1例死亡,与指标程序无关。12个月时免于临床驱动的靶病变血运重建的比例为97.5%(39/40)。卢瑟福分类从基线时的41.5%≥3级转移到12个月时的95%≤1级。12个月时没有截肢。结论:血管成形术前对复杂和钙化病变进行纵向微切口血管准备与少量限流夹层相关。大多数支架放置用于治疗局灶性残留狭窄,大多数使用研究时可用的最短支架长度(40 mm)。只需要一个支架来治疗限制血流的夹层。临床驱动靶病变血运重建术(CDTLR)的97.5%的自由度和12个月后的症状缓解表明,通过FLEX VP进行血管准备对于维持高度钙化的股浅动脉(SFA)或腘窝病变患者的长期预后有价值。临床影响:纵向微切口血管制备是一种短而有效的干预措施,在治疗长且钙化的股动脉和腘动脉闭塞或狭窄12个月后具有良好的临床结果和通畅率。这种创新的血管制备提供了更少的术后残留狭窄和更有利的解剖形态,减少了支架的放置,特别是支架的长度。通过纵向切口制备血管也有利于抗再狭窄药物在病灶内的最佳分布,从而防止因再狭窄而进一步干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endovascular Therapy (formerly the Journal of Endovascular Surgery) was established in 1994 as a forum for all physicians, scientists, and allied healthcare professionals who are engaged or interested in peripheral endovascular techniques and technology. An official publication of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (ISEVS), the Journal of Endovascular Therapy publishes peer-reviewed articles of interest to clinicians and researchers in the field of peripheral endovascular interventions.
期刊最新文献
Percutaneous Superficial Temporal Artery Access Facilitating Carotid Artery Stenting Performed From Distal Radial Artery. Stent Implantation and Thromboendarterectomy for the Common Femoral Artery in Real-World Practice. Endovascular Treatment for Isolated Infected Iliac Artery Aneurysms. Initial Clinical Experience With AneuFix Injectable Biocompatible Elastomer for Translumbar Embolization of Type 2 Endoleaks. Long-Term Follow-up of Subjects With Iliac Occlusive Disease Treated With the Viabahn VBX Balloon-Expandable Endoprosthesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1