Racial Disparities of Type 2 Diabetes Through Exercise: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL American Journal of Preventive Medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2025.01.009
Tong Xia PhD, MPH , Roch A. Nianogo MD, PhD , QingZhao Yu PhD , Tamara Horwich MD, MS , Preethi Srikanthan MD, MS , Kosuke Inoue MD, PhD , Matthew Allison MD, MPH , Zuo-Feng Zhang MD, PhD , Karol E. Watson MD, PhD , Liwei Chen MD, PhD
{"title":"Racial Disparities of Type 2 Diabetes Through Exercise: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis","authors":"Tong Xia PhD, MPH ,&nbsp;Roch A. Nianogo MD, PhD ,&nbsp;QingZhao Yu PhD ,&nbsp;Tamara Horwich MD, MS ,&nbsp;Preethi Srikanthan MD, MS ,&nbsp;Kosuke Inoue MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Matthew Allison MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Zuo-Feng Zhang MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Karol E. Watson MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Liwei Chen MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2025.01.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Persistent racial and ethnic disparities exist for Type 2 diabetes in the U.S. Racial and ethnic minorities have a higher risk of Type 2 diabetes, and studies suggest that they engage in less exercise than White population. This study examined whether and to what degree racial differences in Type 2 diabetes were explained by exercise.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Adults aged 45–84 years without Type 2 diabetes at baseline (2000–2002) were included from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis cohort and followed through 2020. Associations between race and Type 2 diabetes were examined using multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression. The effects of exercise were assessed using natural mediation effects. Analyses were conducted in 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Controlling for confounders, Hispanic (adjusted hazard ratio [95% CI]=2.02 [1.74, 2.34]), Chinese (1.50 [1.24, 1.82]), and Black (1.66 [1.44, 1.93]) participants had higher Type 2 diabetes risks than White participants. Hispanic (β [SE]= −0.29 [0.04] square root of MET-hour/day, <em>p</em>&lt;0.001) and Chinese (−0.25 [0.04], <em>p</em>&lt;0.001) participants had lower habitual intentional exercise than White participants; this was not true for Black participants (−0.01 [0.03], <em>p</em>=0.85). Habitual intentional exercise explained Type 2 diabetes excess risk by 13.6% for Hispanic and 13.2% for Chinese participants but not for Black participants, compared with that for White participants.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Habitual intentional exercise accounted for one tenth of the racial differences in Type 2 diabetes when comparing Hispanic or Chinese populations with White populations. Interventions promoting exercise are crucial to decrease Type 2 diabetes risk for all racial groups but may also narrow disparities in Type 2 diabetes among Hispanic and Chinese populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":"68 4","pages":"Pages 794-803"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074937972500008X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Persistent racial and ethnic disparities exist for Type 2 diabetes in the U.S. Racial and ethnic minorities have a higher risk of Type 2 diabetes, and studies suggest that they engage in less exercise than White population. This study examined whether and to what degree racial differences in Type 2 diabetes were explained by exercise.

Methods

Adults aged 45–84 years without Type 2 diabetes at baseline (2000–2002) were included from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis cohort and followed through 2020. Associations between race and Type 2 diabetes were examined using multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression. The effects of exercise were assessed using natural mediation effects. Analyses were conducted in 2023.

Results

Controlling for confounders, Hispanic (adjusted hazard ratio [95% CI]=2.02 [1.74, 2.34]), Chinese (1.50 [1.24, 1.82]), and Black (1.66 [1.44, 1.93]) participants had higher Type 2 diabetes risks than White participants. Hispanic (β [SE]= −0.29 [0.04] square root of MET-hour/day, p<0.001) and Chinese (−0.25 [0.04], p<0.001) participants had lower habitual intentional exercise than White participants; this was not true for Black participants (−0.01 [0.03], p=0.85). Habitual intentional exercise explained Type 2 diabetes excess risk by 13.6% for Hispanic and 13.2% for Chinese participants but not for Black participants, compared with that for White participants.

Conclusions

Habitual intentional exercise accounted for one tenth of the racial differences in Type 2 diabetes when comparing Hispanic or Chinese populations with White populations. Interventions promoting exercise are crucial to decrease Type 2 diabetes risk for all racial groups but may also narrow disparities in Type 2 diabetes among Hispanic and Chinese populations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2型糖尿病通过运动的种族差异:动脉粥样硬化的多种族研究。
在美国,2型糖尿病(T2D)存在持续的种族和民族差异。少数种族和少数民族患糖尿病的风险更高,研究表明他们比白人锻炼得少。这项研究考察了T2D的种族差异是否可以用运动来解释,以及在多大程度上可以解释。方法:从多种族动脉粥样硬化研究(MESA)队列中纳入45-84岁基线(2000-2002年)无T2D的成年人,随访至2020年。采用多变量Cox比例风险回归检验种族与T2D的关系。通过自然中介效应评估运动解释的效应。分析于2023年进行。结果:在混杂因素控制下,西班牙裔[校正风险比(HR)(95%可信区间CI): 2.02(1.74-2.34)]、中国人[1.50(1.24-1.82)]和黑人[1.66(1.44-1.93)]的T2D风险高于白人。与白人受试者相比,西班牙裔[β (SE): -0.29 (0.04) MET-hour/day的平方根,P < 0.001]和中国人[-0.25 (0.04),P < 0.001]的习惯性有意识锻炼较低,而黑人受试者则不是这样[-0.01 (0.03),P = 0.85]。与白人受试者相比,习惯性有意识的运动解释了西班牙裔和中国人的T2D相对风险分别为13.6%和13.2%,但不能解释黑人受试者的T2D相对风险。结论:当将西班牙裔或华裔人群与白人人群进行比较时,习惯性有意识运动占T2D种族差异的十分之一。促进锻炼的干预措施对于降低所有种族人群的T2D风险至关重要,但也可能缩小西班牙裔和华裔人群在T2D方面的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Preventive Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
1.80%
发文量
395
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Preventive Medicine is the official journal of the American College of Preventive Medicine and the Association for Prevention Teaching and Research. It publishes articles in the areas of prevention research, teaching, practice and policy. Original research is published on interventions aimed at the prevention of chronic and acute disease and the promotion of individual and community health. Of particular emphasis are papers that address the primary and secondary prevention of important clinical, behavioral and public health issues such as injury and violence, infectious disease, women''s health, smoking, sedentary behaviors and physical activity, nutrition, diabetes, obesity, and substance use disorders. Papers also address educational initiatives aimed at improving the ability of health professionals to provide effective clinical prevention and public health services. Papers on health services research pertinent to prevention and public health are also published. The journal also publishes official policy statements from the two co-sponsoring organizations, review articles, media reviews, and editorials. Finally, the journal periodically publishes supplements and special theme issues devoted to areas of current interest to the prevention community.
期刊最新文献
Estimation of Nonfatal Injury Prevalence Among Adults: National Health Interview Survey, 50 States and the District of Columbia, 2020, 2021, and 2023 Correlates of Diagnostic Codes for Documenting Housing Instability: A Citywide Cohort Study Resolving the Paradox of Training in Preventive Medicine The Impact of Adverse Childhood Experiences on Cancer Screening: Findings From the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Chronic Conditions as Risk Factors for COVID-19–Associated Hospitalization Among Adults, 2020–2023
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1