The Cost of Randomness in Evolutionary Algorithms: Crossover Can Save Random Bits.

IF 4.6 2区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Evolutionary Computation Pub Date : 2025-01-14 DOI:10.1162/evco_a_00365
Carlo Kneissl, Dirk Sudholt
{"title":"The Cost of Randomness in Evolutionary Algorithms: Crossover Can Save Random Bits.","authors":"Carlo Kneissl, Dirk Sudholt","doi":"10.1162/evco_a_00365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evolutionary algorithms make countless random decisions during selection, mutation and crossover operations. These random decisions require a steady stream of random numbers. We analyze the expected number of random bits used throughout a run of an evolutionary algorithm and refer to this as the cost of randomness. We give general bounds on the cost of randomness for mutation-based evolutionary algorithms using 1-bit flips or standard mutations using either a naive or a common, more efficient implementation that uses Θ(logn) random bits per mutation. Uniform crossover is a potentially wasteful operator as the number of random bits used equals the Hamming distance of the two parents, which can be up to n. However, we show for a (2+1) Genetic Algorithm that is known to optimize the test function ONEMAX in roughly (e/2)nlnn expected evaluations, twice as fast as the fastest mutation-based evolutionary algorithms, that the total cost of randomness during all crossover operations on ONEMAX is only Θ(n). A more pronounced effect is shown for the common test function JUMPk, where there is an asymptotic decrease both in the number of evaluations and in the cost of randomness. Consequently, the use of crossover can reduce the cost of randomness below that of the fastest evolutionary algorithms that only use standard mutations.</p>","PeriodicalId":50470,"journal":{"name":"Evolutionary Computation","volume":" ","pages":"1-29"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolutionary Computation","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/evco_a_00365","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evolutionary algorithms make countless random decisions during selection, mutation and crossover operations. These random decisions require a steady stream of random numbers. We analyze the expected number of random bits used throughout a run of an evolutionary algorithm and refer to this as the cost of randomness. We give general bounds on the cost of randomness for mutation-based evolutionary algorithms using 1-bit flips or standard mutations using either a naive or a common, more efficient implementation that uses Θ(logn) random bits per mutation. Uniform crossover is a potentially wasteful operator as the number of random bits used equals the Hamming distance of the two parents, which can be up to n. However, we show for a (2+1) Genetic Algorithm that is known to optimize the test function ONEMAX in roughly (e/2)nlnn expected evaluations, twice as fast as the fastest mutation-based evolutionary algorithms, that the total cost of randomness during all crossover operations on ONEMAX is only Θ(n). A more pronounced effect is shown for the common test function JUMPk, where there is an asymptotic decrease both in the number of evaluations and in the cost of randomness. Consequently, the use of crossover can reduce the cost of randomness below that of the fastest evolutionary algorithms that only use standard mutations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
进化算法中随机性的代价:交叉可以节省随机比特。
进化算法在选择、变异和交叉操作中做出无数的随机决策。这些随机决策需要稳定的随机数流。我们分析了进化算法在运行过程中使用的随机比特的预期数量,并将其称为随机性成本。我们给出了基于突变的进化算法的随机成本的一般边界,使用1位翻转或标准突变,使用朴素或常见的,更有效的实现,每个突变使用Θ(logn)随机位。均匀交叉是一个潜在的浪费算子,因为使用的随机比特数等于两个父节点的汉明距离,可以高达n。然而,我们展示了一个(2+1)遗传算法,已知它可以在大约(e/2)nlnn次预期评估中优化测试函数ONEMAX,速度是最快的基于突变的进化算法的两倍,在ONEMAX上所有交叉操作期间的随机性总成本仅为Θ(n)。对于常见的测试函数JUMPk显示了更明显的效果,其中评估的数量和随机性的代价都在逐渐减少。因此,使用交叉可以将随机性的代价降低到仅使用标准突变的最快进化算法之下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Evolutionary Computation
Evolutionary Computation 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
1.50%
发文量
20
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Evolutionary Computation is a leading journal in its field. It provides an international forum for facilitating and enhancing the exchange of information among researchers involved in both the theoretical and practical aspects of computational systems drawing their inspiration from nature, with particular emphasis on evolutionary models of computation such as genetic algorithms, evolutionary strategies, classifier systems, evolutionary programming, and genetic programming. It welcomes articles from related fields such as swarm intelligence (e.g. Ant Colony Optimization and Particle Swarm Optimization), and other nature-inspired computation paradigms (e.g. Artificial Immune Systems). As well as publishing articles describing theoretical and/or experimental work, the journal also welcomes application-focused papers describing breakthrough results in an application domain or methodological papers where the specificities of the real-world problem led to significant algorithmic improvements that could possibly be generalized to other areas.
期刊最新文献
Quality Diversity under Sparse Interaction and Sparse Reward: Application to Grasping in Robotics. Runtime Analysis of Typical Decomposition Approaches in MOEA/D for Many-Objective Optimization Problems. Survey of interactive evolutionary decomposition-based multiobjective optimization methods. The Cost of Randomness in Evolutionary Algorithms: Crossover Can Save Random Bits. Territorial Differential Meta-Evolution: An Algorithm for Seeking All the Desirable Optima of a Multivariable Function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1