Psychosocial programs to alleviate fertility-related distress in patients with cancer: A mixed-methods systematic review.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING European Journal of Oncology Nursing Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1016/j.ejon.2025.102787
Mina Jang, Jinyoung Park, Jeehee Han
{"title":"Psychosocial programs to alleviate fertility-related distress in patients with cancer: A mixed-methods systematic review.","authors":"Mina Jang, Jinyoung Park, Jeehee Han","doi":"10.1016/j.ejon.2025.102787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This mixed-methods systematic review aimed to identify the key components of psychosocial programs for fertility-related distress in patients with cancer and integrate the findings from quantitative and qualitative studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search for relevant studies published between January 2012 and March 2024 was conducted in the PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Review Library databases. Data were synthesized using a sequential descriptive design.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies were included: six randomized controlled trials (two of which also included qualitative data) and two qualitative studies. The quantitative data found direct effects such as increased fertility-related knowledge, although the results on psychological outcomes such as anxiety and depression were inconsistent. The qualitative findings confirmed patients' ambivalence about facing their fertility issues, increased knowledge for decision-making, and unmet needs such as information overload and a lack of psychological support. For the cognitive-behavioral outcomes, fertility-related concerns were examined in greater depth in the quantitative studies, whereas the qualitative studies focused more on empowerment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review emphasizes the need for the careful design of psychosocial interventions to prevent negative emotional impacts while supporting the long-term self-management of fertility-related issues. Tailoring these interventions to meet the specific needs of patients is essential for improving psychosocial outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51048,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Oncology Nursing","volume":"74 ","pages":"102787"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2025.102787","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This mixed-methods systematic review aimed to identify the key components of psychosocial programs for fertility-related distress in patients with cancer and integrate the findings from quantitative and qualitative studies.

Methods: A search for relevant studies published between January 2012 and March 2024 was conducted in the PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Review Library databases. Data were synthesized using a sequential descriptive design.

Results: Eight studies were included: six randomized controlled trials (two of which also included qualitative data) and two qualitative studies. The quantitative data found direct effects such as increased fertility-related knowledge, although the results on psychological outcomes such as anxiety and depression were inconsistent. The qualitative findings confirmed patients' ambivalence about facing their fertility issues, increased knowledge for decision-making, and unmet needs such as information overload and a lack of psychological support. For the cognitive-behavioral outcomes, fertility-related concerns were examined in greater depth in the quantitative studies, whereas the qualitative studies focused more on empowerment.

Conclusion: This review emphasizes the need for the careful design of psychosocial interventions to prevent negative emotional impacts while supporting the long-term self-management of fertility-related issues. Tailoring these interventions to meet the specific needs of patients is essential for improving psychosocial outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减轻癌症患者生育相关痛苦的社会心理项目:一项混合方法的系统综述。
目的:这项混合方法的系统综述旨在确定癌症患者生育相关痛苦的心理社会项目的关键组成部分,并整合定量和定性研究的结果。方法:检索PubMed、EMBASE、CINAHL、MEDLINE、PsycINFO和Cochrane Review Library数据库中2012年1月至2024年3月间发表的相关研究。采用顺序描述性设计对数据进行综合。结果:纳入8项研究:6项随机对照试验(其中2项还纳入定性研究)和2项定性研究。定量数据发现了直接影响,如增加与生育有关的知识,尽管焦虑和抑郁等心理结果不一致。定性研究结果证实了患者在面对生育问题时的矛盾心理,决策知识的增加,以及信息过载和缺乏心理支持等未满足的需求。对于认知行为结果,定量研究更深入地研究了与生育有关的问题,而定性研究则更多地关注赋权。结论:本综述强调需要精心设计心理社会干预措施,以防止负面情绪影响,同时支持生育相关问题的长期自我管理。调整这些干预措施以满足患者的特定需求对于改善社会心理结果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.60%
发文量
109
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Oncology Nursing is an international journal which publishes research of direct relevance to patient care, nurse education, management and policy development. EJON is proud to be the official journal of the European Oncology Nursing Society. The journal publishes the following types of papers: • Original research articles • Review articles
期刊最新文献
End-of-life care preferences among cancer patients: A cross-sectional study in Vietnam. Social functioning longitudinal trajectory and its predictors in young and middle-aged postoperative pituitary tumor patients: A growth mixture model. Association between psychological flexibility and self-perceived burden in patients with cervical cancer: A computer-simulated network analysis. Clinical and economic impact of the advanced practice nurse in lung cancer patients receiving immunotherapy-based treatments: A quantitative study. Changing an exercise behaviour for physically inactive patients with breast cancer during chemotherapy- the critical role of nurse support: An implementation study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1