Shivani Gupta, Aliya Centner, Nidhi Patel, Jonathan Kibble
{"title":"Investigating the nature of trust in the medical student-professor relationship: an interview study.","authors":"Shivani Gupta, Aliya Centner, Nidhi Patel, Jonathan Kibble","doi":"10.1152/advan.00213.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While trust is an essential resource in successful social exchanges, the basis of trust in the student-professor relationship in higher education has not been extensively studied. The purpose of the present study was to gain a better understanding of how trust is developed within a medical school learning environment. To that end, we applied a qualitative approach using semi-structured interviews. Interview guides were developed based on the leading model of organizational trust, which posits that trustworthiness can be modeled based on three factors of a trustee, namely their perceived ability, benevolence and integrity. Eleven faculty members and 11 medical students in their core clerkships agreed to participate, providing in-depth viewpoints that were transcribed verbatim for thematic analysis. Faculty interviews sought to develop a model describing how trust develops in the medical school learning environment and student interviews interrogated how faculty performed within each trust domain to corroborate best practices. The research team applied interpretive-phenomenological analysis to develop consensus around the key themes. Arising from the data we propose a model showing how faculty demonstrate their ability, benevolence and integrity to learners as well as features of a learning environment that promote trust, including positive student traits. Finally, we recommend a series of best practices for faculty wishing to develop a trusting learning climate.</p>","PeriodicalId":50852,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Physiology Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Physiology Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00213.2024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
While trust is an essential resource in successful social exchanges, the basis of trust in the student-professor relationship in higher education has not been extensively studied. The purpose of the present study was to gain a better understanding of how trust is developed within a medical school learning environment. To that end, we applied a qualitative approach using semi-structured interviews. Interview guides were developed based on the leading model of organizational trust, which posits that trustworthiness can be modeled based on three factors of a trustee, namely their perceived ability, benevolence and integrity. Eleven faculty members and 11 medical students in their core clerkships agreed to participate, providing in-depth viewpoints that were transcribed verbatim for thematic analysis. Faculty interviews sought to develop a model describing how trust develops in the medical school learning environment and student interviews interrogated how faculty performed within each trust domain to corroborate best practices. The research team applied interpretive-phenomenological analysis to develop consensus around the key themes. Arising from the data we propose a model showing how faculty demonstrate their ability, benevolence and integrity to learners as well as features of a learning environment that promote trust, including positive student traits. Finally, we recommend a series of best practices for faculty wishing to develop a trusting learning climate.
期刊介绍:
Advances in Physiology Education promotes and disseminates educational scholarship in order to enhance teaching and learning of physiology, neuroscience and pathophysiology. The journal publishes peer-reviewed descriptions of innovations that improve teaching in the classroom and laboratory, essays on education, and review articles based on our current understanding of physiological mechanisms. Submissions that evaluate new technologies for teaching and research, and educational pedagogy, are especially welcome. The audience for the journal includes educators at all levels: K–12, undergraduate, graduate, and professional programs.