Ramon Hüntermann, Caroline O Fischer-Bacca, Marcel F Alves, Vanio A Livramento Junior, Francisco B Alexandrino, Mariane Y Sato, Rodrigo França Gomes, Franciani R Rocha, Marcelo V Gambetta, Edielle S Melo
{"title":"Sacubitril-Valsartan in Cancer Therapy-Induced Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Functional and Hemodynamic Parameters.","authors":"Ramon Hüntermann, Caroline O Fischer-Bacca, Marcel F Alves, Vanio A Livramento Junior, Francisco B Alexandrino, Mariane Y Sato, Rodrigo França Gomes, Franciani R Rocha, Marcelo V Gambetta, Edielle S Melo","doi":"10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2025.102987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cancer therapy-induced cardiotoxicity (CTRCD), in the form of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), is being increasingly recognized. However, the potential benefits of sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) in managing HFrEF secondary to CTRCD remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of S/V in preventing cardiotoxicity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for studies evaluating S/V in patients with HFrEF due to CTRCD and reporting the following outcomes: (1) NYHA class; (2) NT-ProBNP and (3) echocardiographic measurements, specifically left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), global longitudinal strain (GLS) and E/e' ratio. Statistical analyses were performed using RStudio software. Heterogeneity was assessed using I² statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 257 patients from six studies. All patients received S/V. The mean patient age was 63 ± 8 years, and 85% of patients had breast cancer. The mean LVEF was 34±7% at baseline. S/V significantly improved NYHA class compared to baseline (MD -0.7; 95% CI -1.2 to -0.3; p<0.01), NT-proBNP (MD -985.1 pg/mL; 95% CI -1231.3 to -739.1; p<0.01), GLS (MD -2.5%; 95% CI -3.6 to -1.4; p<0.01;), and E/e' (MD -1.99; 95% CI 3.7 to -0.1; p=0.03). LVEF (MD 7.3%; 95% CI 5.4 to 9.2; p<0.01) with S/V treatment relative to baseline.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with HFrEF due to CTRCD, S/V significantly improved the clinical and echocardiographic parameters of left ventricular systolic and diastolic functions.</p>","PeriodicalId":51006,"journal":{"name":"Current Problems in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"102987"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Problems in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2025.102987","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Cancer therapy-induced cardiotoxicity (CTRCD), in the form of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), is being increasingly recognized. However, the potential benefits of sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) in managing HFrEF secondary to CTRCD remain unclear.
Objective: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of S/V in preventing cardiotoxicity.
Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for studies evaluating S/V in patients with HFrEF due to CTRCD and reporting the following outcomes: (1) NYHA class; (2) NT-ProBNP and (3) echocardiographic measurements, specifically left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), global longitudinal strain (GLS) and E/e' ratio. Statistical analyses were performed using RStudio software. Heterogeneity was assessed using I² statistics.
Results: We included 257 patients from six studies. All patients received S/V. The mean patient age was 63 ± 8 years, and 85% of patients had breast cancer. The mean LVEF was 34±7% at baseline. S/V significantly improved NYHA class compared to baseline (MD -0.7; 95% CI -1.2 to -0.3; p<0.01), NT-proBNP (MD -985.1 pg/mL; 95% CI -1231.3 to -739.1; p<0.01), GLS (MD -2.5%; 95% CI -3.6 to -1.4; p<0.01;), and E/e' (MD -1.99; 95% CI 3.7 to -0.1; p=0.03). LVEF (MD 7.3%; 95% CI 5.4 to 9.2; p<0.01) with S/V treatment relative to baseline.
Conclusion: In patients with HFrEF due to CTRCD, S/V significantly improved the clinical and echocardiographic parameters of left ventricular systolic and diastolic functions.
期刊介绍:
Under the editorial leadership of noted cardiologist Dr. Hector O. Ventura, Current Problems in Cardiology provides focused, comprehensive coverage of important clinical topics in cardiology. Each monthly issues, addresses a selected clinical problem or condition, including pathophysiology, invasive and noninvasive diagnosis, drug therapy, surgical management, and rehabilitation; or explores the clinical applications of a diagnostic modality or a particular category of drugs. Critical commentary from the distinguished editorial board accompanies each monograph, providing readers with additional insights. An extensive bibliography in each issue saves hours of library research.