Adverse events during and after early mobilisation: A post hoc analysis of the TEAM trial.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Australian Critical Care Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1016/j.aucc.2024.101156
Tessa Broadley, Ary Serpa Neto, Michael Bailey, Rinaldo Bellomo, Kathy Brickell, Heidi Buhr, Belinda J Gabbe, Doug W Gould, Meg Harrold, Sally Hurford, Theodore J Iwashyna, Alistair D Nichol, Jeffrey J Presneill, Stefan J Schaller, Janani Sivasuthan, Claire J Tipping, Steven Webb, Paul J Young, Alisa M Higgins, Carol L Hodgson
{"title":"Adverse events during and after early mobilisation: A post hoc analysis of the TEAM trial.","authors":"Tessa Broadley, Ary Serpa Neto, Michael Bailey, Rinaldo Bellomo, Kathy Brickell, Heidi Buhr, Belinda J Gabbe, Doug W Gould, Meg Harrold, Sally Hurford, Theodore J Iwashyna, Alistair D Nichol, Jeffrey J Presneill, Stefan J Schaller, Janani Sivasuthan, Claire J Tipping, Steven Webb, Paul J Young, Alisa M Higgins, Carol L Hodgson","doi":"10.1016/j.aucc.2024.101156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Treatment of Mechanically Ventilated Adults with Early Activity and Mobilisation (TEAM) trial reported a higher occurrence of adverse events with greater mobilisation. However, their timing and nature remained unexplored. We conducted an in-depth exploration of such events.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this paper is to thoroughly examine the timing and characteristics of adverse events reported within the TEAM trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adverse event data were collected daily in real time. Categorical data were compared using the Fisher's exact test. The relationship between adverse events and patient survival was analysed using a Cox-regression frailty model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 37 out of 371 patients (10.0%) in the early mobilisation group and 16 out of 370 patients (4.3%) in the usual care group experienced adverse events, with 71 events in the early mobilisation group compared to 24 events in the usual care group. The most common adverse events were altered blood pressure in 21 out of 53 patients (39.6%), arrhythmia in 17 out of 53 patients (32.1%), and oxygen desaturation in nine of 53 patients (17.0%). Patients with an adverse event were more likely to have congestive heart failure (absolute percentage difference: 16.1, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.1 to 26.1), peripheral vascular disease (absolute percentage difference: 6.4, 95% CI: 1.3 to 11.5), heart attack (absolute percentage difference: 13.5, 95% CI: 5.9 to 21.1), or stroke (absolute percentage difference: 9.3, 95% CI: 3.5 to 15.1). Adverse events occurred at a median of 4 days with early mobilisation and 7 days with usual care. There was no significant difference in survival for patients who experienced an adverse event compared to those without an adverse event.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adverse events were more common in patients randomised to early active mobilisation, were cardiovascular and respiratory in nature, tended to occur earlier with active mobilisation, and cardiovascular comorbidities were more common in such patients. This information can help guide future studies in this field.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>TEAM ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03133377, registered 28 April 2017.</p>","PeriodicalId":51239,"journal":{"name":"Australian Critical Care","volume":"38 3","pages":"101156"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2024.101156","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Treatment of Mechanically Ventilated Adults with Early Activity and Mobilisation (TEAM) trial reported a higher occurrence of adverse events with greater mobilisation. However, their timing and nature remained unexplored. We conducted an in-depth exploration of such events.

Objective: The purpose of this paper is to thoroughly examine the timing and characteristics of adverse events reported within the TEAM trial.

Methods: Adverse event data were collected daily in real time. Categorical data were compared using the Fisher's exact test. The relationship between adverse events and patient survival was analysed using a Cox-regression frailty model.

Results: Overall, 37 out of 371 patients (10.0%) in the early mobilisation group and 16 out of 370 patients (4.3%) in the usual care group experienced adverse events, with 71 events in the early mobilisation group compared to 24 events in the usual care group. The most common adverse events were altered blood pressure in 21 out of 53 patients (39.6%), arrhythmia in 17 out of 53 patients (32.1%), and oxygen desaturation in nine of 53 patients (17.0%). Patients with an adverse event were more likely to have congestive heart failure (absolute percentage difference: 16.1, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.1 to 26.1), peripheral vascular disease (absolute percentage difference: 6.4, 95% CI: 1.3 to 11.5), heart attack (absolute percentage difference: 13.5, 95% CI: 5.9 to 21.1), or stroke (absolute percentage difference: 9.3, 95% CI: 3.5 to 15.1). Adverse events occurred at a median of 4 days with early mobilisation and 7 days with usual care. There was no significant difference in survival for patients who experienced an adverse event compared to those without an adverse event.

Conclusion: Adverse events were more common in patients randomised to early active mobilisation, were cardiovascular and respiratory in nature, tended to occur earlier with active mobilisation, and cardiovascular comorbidities were more common in such patients. This information can help guide future studies in this field.

Trial registration: TEAM ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03133377, registered 28 April 2017.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Critical Care
Australian Critical Care NURSING-NURSING
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
148
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Critical Care is the official journal of the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses (ACCCN). It is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal, providing clinically relevant research, reviews and articles of interest to the critical care community. Australian Critical Care publishes peer-reviewed scholarly papers that report research findings, research-based reviews, discussion papers and commentaries which are of interest to an international readership of critical care practitioners, educators, administrators and researchers. Interprofessional articles are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Clinician views on selective decontamination of the digestive tract in mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care units: A survey. Adverse events associated with umbilical vascular catheters in neonatal intensive care: Development of a risk prediction model. Adverse events during and after early mobilisation: A post hoc analysis of the TEAM trial. Critical care nurses' prioritisation of patient care, including delirium prevention and management strategies: A mixed-method study. Nonpharmacological interventions to promote sleep in the adult critical patients unit: A scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1