Use of 3D Printing Technology to Improve Lead Shield Fabrication for Electron Therapy of the Face.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Practical Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1016/j.prro.2024.12.008
Igor Bundalevski, Amy S Harrison, Michael F Dzeda, Laura A Doyle, Hungcheng Chen
{"title":"Use of 3D Printing Technology to Improve Lead Shield Fabrication for Electron Therapy of the Face.","authors":"Igor Bundalevski, Amy S Harrison, Michael F Dzeda, Laura A Doyle, Hungcheng Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.prro.2024.12.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Superficial lesions of the face are often treated with an electron beam and surface collimation utilizing a conformal lead shield with an opening around the region of treatment (ROT). To fabricate the lead shield, an imprint of the patient face is needed. Historically, this was achieved using a laborious and time-consuming process that involved a gypsum imprinted model (GIM) of the patient topography. We propose utilization of 3-dimentional (3D) printing technology to create a 3-dimensional printed custom model (3D-PCM) of the patient facial topography as a more accurate and more efficient alternative to GIM. GIM and 3D-PCM were generated for three patients requiring en face electron therapy of the nose. The models for both methods were then CT-scanned and fused rigidly to the CT of the patient. The accuracy of the models was compared with the CT image of the patient via visual inspection and the Sørensen-Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). The efficiency of the two methods was evaluated by the average time needed to complete each process based on user-reported experience. The average DSC between the patient and GIM is 0.95336 (standard deviation (SD) = 0.0099479), while the average DSC of the patient and 3D-PCM is 0.97886 (SD = 0.0037441). With respect to efficiency, the average time to fabricate and dry GIM is 54.5 hours with hands-on time of 2.5 hours, while generation of 3D-PCM takes about 6.5 hours, with hands on time of approximately 2.5 hours. 3D-PCMs based on CT scan images are found to be an excellent substitute for GIMs by exhibiting a higher degree of fidelity with patient's anatomy, requiring significantly less time to complete, being less labor intensive, and allowing for greater patient comfort. The disadvantage of exposing the patient to radiation associated with the CT scan image acquisition for designing a 3D-PCM could be eliminated by employing 3D-camera scanning technology.</p>","PeriodicalId":54245,"journal":{"name":"Practical Radiation Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2024.12.008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Superficial lesions of the face are often treated with an electron beam and surface collimation utilizing a conformal lead shield with an opening around the region of treatment (ROT). To fabricate the lead shield, an imprint of the patient face is needed. Historically, this was achieved using a laborious and time-consuming process that involved a gypsum imprinted model (GIM) of the patient topography. We propose utilization of 3-dimentional (3D) printing technology to create a 3-dimensional printed custom model (3D-PCM) of the patient facial topography as a more accurate and more efficient alternative to GIM. GIM and 3D-PCM were generated for three patients requiring en face electron therapy of the nose. The models for both methods were then CT-scanned and fused rigidly to the CT of the patient. The accuracy of the models was compared with the CT image of the patient via visual inspection and the Sørensen-Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). The efficiency of the two methods was evaluated by the average time needed to complete each process based on user-reported experience. The average DSC between the patient and GIM is 0.95336 (standard deviation (SD) = 0.0099479), while the average DSC of the patient and 3D-PCM is 0.97886 (SD = 0.0037441). With respect to efficiency, the average time to fabricate and dry GIM is 54.5 hours with hands-on time of 2.5 hours, while generation of 3D-PCM takes about 6.5 hours, with hands on time of approximately 2.5 hours. 3D-PCMs based on CT scan images are found to be an excellent substitute for GIMs by exhibiting a higher degree of fidelity with patient's anatomy, requiring significantly less time to complete, being less labor intensive, and allowing for greater patient comfort. The disadvantage of exposing the patient to radiation associated with the CT scan image acquisition for designing a 3D-PCM could be eliminated by employing 3D-camera scanning technology.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用3D打印技术改进面部电子治疗的铅屏蔽制造。
面部的浅表病变通常使用电子束和表面准直,利用在治疗区域周围开一个开口的适形铅屏蔽(ROT)。为了制造铅屏蔽,需要在病人脸上留下印记。从历史上看,这是一个费力而耗时的过程,涉及患者地形的石膏印迹模型(GIM)。我们建议利用三维(3D)打印技术来创建患者面部地形的三维打印定制模型(3D- pcm),作为更准确和更有效的替代GIM。对3例需要鼻面电子治疗的患者进行了GIM和3D-PCM的生成。然后对两种方法的模型进行CT扫描,并与患者的CT进行刚性融合。将模型的准确性与患者肉眼CT图像及Sørensen-Dice相似系数(DSC)进行比较。两种方法的效率是通过基于用户报告的体验完成每个过程所需的平均时间来评估的。患者与GIM的平均DSC为0.95336(标准差(SD) = 0.0099479),患者与3D-PCM的平均DSC为0.97886 (SD = 0.0037441)。在效率方面,制造和干燥GIM的平均时间为54.5小时,手工时间为2.5小时,而生成3D-PCM大约需要6.5小时,手工时间约为2.5小时。基于CT扫描图像的3d - pcm被认为是GIMs的一个很好的替代品,因为它与患者的解剖结构表现出更高的保真度,需要更少的时间来完成,更少的劳动密集型,并且允许更大的患者舒适度。在设计3D-PCM时,CT扫描图像采集会使患者暴露在辐射下,这一缺点可以通过采用3d相机扫描技术来消除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Practical Radiation Oncology
Practical Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
177
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: The overarching mission of Practical Radiation Oncology is to improve the quality of radiation oncology practice. PRO''s purpose is to document the state of current practice, providing background for those in training and continuing education for practitioners, through discussion and illustration of new techniques, evaluation of current practices, and publication of case reports. PRO strives to provide its readers content that emphasizes knowledge "with a purpose." The content of PRO includes: Original articles focusing on patient safety, quality measurement, or quality improvement initiatives Original articles focusing on imaging, contouring, target delineation, simulation, treatment planning, immobilization, organ motion, and other practical issues ASTRO guidelines, position papers, and consensus statements Essays that highlight enriching personal experiences in caring for cancer patients and their families.
期刊最新文献
Use of 3D Printing Technology to Improve Lead Shield Fabrication for Electron Therapy of the Face. Radiation Therapy for Dupuytren Contracture. Anesthetic Considerations for Gynecologic HDR Brachytherapy. Radiation-induced cardiac disease: Modern techniques to reduce cardiac toxicity. Feasibility of Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Sparing Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Lung Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1