Treatment strategy involving docetaxel plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil followed by conversion surgery for locally advanced unresectable/borderline resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Diseases of the Esophagus Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1093/dote/doae114
Shota Igaue, Ryoko Nozaki, Daichi Utsunomiya, Yuto Kubo, Kentaro Kubo, Daisuke Kurita, Shun Yamamoto, Mototaka Miyake, Koshiro Ishiyama, Junya Oguma, Ken Kato, Hiroyuki Daiko
{"title":"Treatment strategy involving docetaxel plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil followed by conversion surgery for locally advanced unresectable/borderline resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.","authors":"Shota Igaue, Ryoko Nozaki, Daichi Utsunomiya, Yuto Kubo, Kentaro Kubo, Daisuke Kurita, Shun Yamamoto, Mototaka Miyake, Koshiro Ishiyama, Junya Oguma, Ken Kato, Hiroyuki Daiko","doi":"10.1093/dote/doae114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) is the standard treatment for unresectable (T4) esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but the prognosis is poor. Borderline resectable (T3br) ESCC has been discussed, but its clinical features and appropriate treatment are unclear. The effects of docetaxel plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) therapy and subsequent surgery for potentially unresectable ESCC remain controversial. This was a single-center retrospective cohort study. Patients with T3 or deeper ESCC lesions between January 2017 and June 2020 were examined. We identified T3br/T4 ESCC patients who initially received DCF therapy or dCRT, and analyzed the long-term outcomes of these patients. Seventy-four patients with T3br/T4 ESCC were identified. Forty-four patients initially received DCF therapy, while thirty initially received dCRT. The 3-year overall survival of T3br/T4 patients in the DCF group was better than that in the dCRT group (62.9% vs. 34.1%, P = 0.001). In the T3br cohort, 95.8% of patients underwent surgery after DCF therapy, with an R0 resection rate of 78.3%. In the T4 group, 40% of patients underwent surgery after DCF, with a 75.0% R0 resection rate. No cases of reoperation or in-hospital death occurred. For both subgroups, T3br and T4, the prognosis tended to be better in the DCF group than in the dCRT group. This study explored real-world data from T3br/T4 ESCC patients who initially received DCF and subsequent surgery and revealed that DCF is a promising treatment strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":54277,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases of the Esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doae114","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) is the standard treatment for unresectable (T4) esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but the prognosis is poor. Borderline resectable (T3br) ESCC has been discussed, but its clinical features and appropriate treatment are unclear. The effects of docetaxel plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) therapy and subsequent surgery for potentially unresectable ESCC remain controversial. This was a single-center retrospective cohort study. Patients with T3 or deeper ESCC lesions between January 2017 and June 2020 were examined. We identified T3br/T4 ESCC patients who initially received DCF therapy or dCRT, and analyzed the long-term outcomes of these patients. Seventy-four patients with T3br/T4 ESCC were identified. Forty-four patients initially received DCF therapy, while thirty initially received dCRT. The 3-year overall survival of T3br/T4 patients in the DCF group was better than that in the dCRT group (62.9% vs. 34.1%, P = 0.001). In the T3br cohort, 95.8% of patients underwent surgery after DCF therapy, with an R0 resection rate of 78.3%. In the T4 group, 40% of patients underwent surgery after DCF, with a 75.0% R0 resection rate. No cases of reoperation or in-hospital death occurred. For both subgroups, T3br and T4, the prognosis tended to be better in the DCF group than in the dCRT group. This study explored real-world data from T3br/T4 ESCC patients who initially received DCF and subsequent surgery and revealed that DCF is a promising treatment strategy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗策略包括多西紫杉醇加顺铂和5-氟尿嘧啶,然后对局部晚期不可切除/交界性可切除的食管鳞状细胞癌进行转化手术。
最终放化疗(dCRT)是不可切除(T4)食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)的标准治疗方法,但预后较差。边缘性可切除(T3br) ESCC已被讨论,但其临床特征和适当的治疗尚不清楚。多西紫杉醇联合顺铂和5-氟尿嘧啶(DCF)治疗和随后的手术治疗可能无法切除的ESCC的效果仍然存在争议。这是一项单中心回顾性队列研究。2017年1月至2020年6月期间,对T3或更深ESCC病变患者进行了检查。我们确定了最初接受DCF或dCRT治疗的T3br/T4 ESCC患者,并分析了这些患者的长期预后。74例T3br/T4 ESCC患者被确诊。44例患者最初接受DCF治疗,30例患者最初接受dCRT治疗。DCF组T3br/T4患者的3年总生存率优于dCRT组(62.9%比34.1%,P = 0.001)。在T3br队列中,95.8%的患者在DCF治疗后接受了手术,R0切除率为78.3%。在T4组中,40%的患者在DCF后接受手术,R0切除率为75.0%。无再手术及院内死亡病例发生。对于T3br和T4两个亚组,DCF组预后优于dCRT组。本研究探讨了最初接受DCF并随后进行手术的T3br/T4 ESCC患者的真实数据,揭示了DCF是一种很有前景的治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diseases of the Esophagus
Diseases of the Esophagus Medicine-Gastroenterology
自引率
7.70%
发文量
568
期刊介绍: Diseases of the Esophagus covers all aspects of the esophagus - etiology, investigation and diagnosis, and both medical and surgical treatment.
期刊最新文献
Eosinophilic esophagitis prevalence, incidence, and presenting features: a 22-year population-based observational study from southwest Sweden. Exploring X: barriers to care for eosinophilic esophagitis. Effect of benralizumab on histopathology and inflammatory signatures in a clinical cohort of eosinophilic esophagitis. Identification of gaps in the delivery of high-quality care of patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. Increased expression of proton pump and allergic inflammation genes predicts PPI failure in pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1