Measurement tools used to assess individual health assets among refugee populations: a scoping review.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Promotion International Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1093/heapro/daae199
Temesgen Muche Ewunie, Andrew Hayen, Angela Dawson
{"title":"Measurement tools used to assess individual health assets among refugee populations: a scoping review.","authors":"Temesgen Muche Ewunie, Andrew Hayen, Angela Dawson","doi":"10.1093/heapro/daae199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Forced migration is increasing globally, which has detrimental effects on the physical and mental health of refugees, who may face significant challenges accessing healthcare services. However, refugees also possess considerable strengths or assets that can protect against various health challenges. Identifying and strengthening the individual health assets of refugees is critical to promoting their health and mitigating these health challenges. Yet, there is a paucity of data on refugees' individual health assets, including tools to measure them. Therefore, this scoping review aimed to identify and summarise the available measurement tools to assess the individual health assets of refugees. We conducted a comprehensive literature search using six electronic databases and a Google search without restrictions on publication dates. We used Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework approach to streamline the review processes. Forty-one eligible studies were included, from which 28 individual health asset tools were identified. Of these, 11 tools were tested for validity in refugee populations. Among the validated tools, the reliability scores for the measures of individual health asset outcomes, including resilience (Child and Youth Resilience Measure, Wagnild and Young's Resilience Scale, and Psychological Resilience Scale), acculturation (Vancouver Index of Acculturation and Bicultural Involvement Questionnaire), self-esteem (Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale), and self-efficacy (Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale), ranged from good to excellent. The findings provide guidance for health service planners, humanitarian organisations, and researchers regarding the appropriateness and quality of tools that can be applied to assess individual health assets, which are crucial for designing culturally sensitive asset-based health promotion interventions for refugees.</p>","PeriodicalId":54256,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion International","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11739720/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daae199","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forced migration is increasing globally, which has detrimental effects on the physical and mental health of refugees, who may face significant challenges accessing healthcare services. However, refugees also possess considerable strengths or assets that can protect against various health challenges. Identifying and strengthening the individual health assets of refugees is critical to promoting their health and mitigating these health challenges. Yet, there is a paucity of data on refugees' individual health assets, including tools to measure them. Therefore, this scoping review aimed to identify and summarise the available measurement tools to assess the individual health assets of refugees. We conducted a comprehensive literature search using six electronic databases and a Google search without restrictions on publication dates. We used Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework approach to streamline the review processes. Forty-one eligible studies were included, from which 28 individual health asset tools were identified. Of these, 11 tools were tested for validity in refugee populations. Among the validated tools, the reliability scores for the measures of individual health asset outcomes, including resilience (Child and Youth Resilience Measure, Wagnild and Young's Resilience Scale, and Psychological Resilience Scale), acculturation (Vancouver Index of Acculturation and Bicultural Involvement Questionnaire), self-esteem (Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale), and self-efficacy (Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale), ranged from good to excellent. The findings provide guidance for health service planners, humanitarian organisations, and researchers regarding the appropriateness and quality of tools that can be applied to assess individual health assets, which are crucial for designing culturally sensitive asset-based health promotion interventions for refugees.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于评估难民人口个人健康资产的测量工具:范围审查。
在全球范围内,被迫移徙现象正在增加,这对难民的身心健康产生了不利影响,他们在获得保健服务方面可能面临重大挑战。然而,难民也具有相当大的优势或资产,可以抵御各种健康挑战。确定和加强难民的个人健康资产对于促进他们的健康和减轻这些健康挑战至关重要。然而,缺乏关于难民个人健康资产的数据,包括衡量这些资产的工具。因此,这次范围审查的目的是确定和总结现有的衡量工具,以评估难民的个人健康资产。我们使用6个电子数据库进行了全面的文献检索,并在没有出版日期限制的情况下进行了谷歌检索。我们使用了Arksey和O'Malley的方法论框架方法来简化审查过程。纳入了41项符合条件的研究,从中确定了28项个人健康资产工具。其中,有11个工具在难民人群中进行了有效性测试。在经过验证的工具中,个人健康资产结果测量的信度得分,包括弹性(儿童和青少年弹性测量,Wagnild和Young的弹性量表和心理弹性量表),文化适应(温哥华适应指数和双文化参与问卷),自尊(Rosenberg自尊量表)和自我效能(广义自我效能量表),范围从好到优。这些发现为卫生服务规划者、人道主义组织和研究人员提供了关于可用于评估个人健康资产的工具的适当性和质量的指导,这对于为难民设计具有文化敏感性的基于资产的健康促进干预措施至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Promotion International
Health Promotion International Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
146
期刊介绍: Health Promotion International contains refereed original articles, reviews, and debate articles on major themes and innovations in the health promotion field. In line with the remits of the series of global conferences on health promotion the journal expressly invites contributions from sectors beyond health. These may include education, employment, government, the media, industry, environmental agencies, and community networks. As the thought journal of the international health promotion movement we seek in particular theoretical, methodological and activist advances to the field. Thus, the journal provides a unique focal point for articles of high quality that describe not only theories and concepts, research projects and policy formulation, but also planned and spontaneous activities, organizational change, as well as social and environmental development.
期刊最新文献
Developing a co-designed, culturally responsive physical activity program for Pasifika communities in Western Sydney, Australia. Enhancing young people's pregnancy loss and fertility awareness and knowledge via schools: a way forward. Association between mobility decline and health literacy in older Japanese adults: Onjuku study. Designing supports for family and friends: outcomes from an Australian lived experience of suicide workshop. Health literacy and psychological wellbeing of employees working from home in Germany-online survey results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1