Topical Brimonidine Tartrate 0.33% Gel versus 577-nm Pro-yellow Laser for the Treatment of Post-acne Erythema: A Comparative Study.

Q2 Medicine Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology Pub Date : 2025-01-01
Eman Awadallah Mohamed, Zakaria Mahran Obaid, Ibrahim Fouda
{"title":"Topical Brimonidine Tartrate 0.33% Gel versus 577-nm Pro-yellow Laser for the Treatment of Post-acne Erythema: A Comparative Study.","authors":"Eman Awadallah Mohamed, Zakaria Mahran Obaid, Ibrahim Fouda","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post acne erythema (PAE) is a common sequela of inflammatory acne vulgaris resulting from the dilatation of microcapillaries within the papillary dermis, thinning of the epidermis, and release of inflammatory cytokines. <b>OBJECTIVE:</b> The authors sought to compare the safety and efficacy of topical Brimonidine tartrate 0.33% gel versus A 577-nm pro-yellow laser for treatment of post acne erythema.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a comparative study, randomized clinical trials conducted on 60 adult patients with PAE. Patients were assigned into two groups: Group I included 30 patients who received brimonidine tartrate 0.33% gel once daily for three months, and Group II included 30 patients who received Pro-yellow laser with 577-nm therapy, for four sessions at three weeks intervals. Evaluation of erythema was done by Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA) and Patient's Self-Assessment (PSA) scales at baseline and at the end of the therapy. The dermoscopic images were analyzed for percent area of erythema and the optical density (OD) using ImageJ® freeware.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two patients (73.3%) were females and eight patients (26.7%) were males in Group I. In Group II, 20 patients (66.7%) were females and 10 patients (33.3%) were males. The mean±SD age of the studied groups was 22.07 years ±2.64 ranging from 20 to 24 years in Group I versus 20.93 years ±2.88 ranging from 19 to 23 years in Group II. Clinical improvement is distributed as follows among Group I; 56.7 percent are excellent, 56.7 percent good, 26.7 percent poor, and 10 percent fair for Group II; 33.3 percent good, 6.7 percent poor, and 60 percent excellent. There was no statistically significant difference between studied groups as regard Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA), Patient's Self-Assessment (PSA) mean area percentage and the optical density (OD) before treatment, while a statistically significant difference between studied groups after treatment was observed (<i>p</i><0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Topical brimonidine tartrate 0.33% gel and 577-nm pro yellow laser were effective and well tolerated therapeutic options for treatment of Post acne erythema (PAE), however the 577-nm Pro yellow laser was superior to brimonidine tartrate 0.33% gel.</p>","PeriodicalId":53616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology","volume":"18 1","pages":"35-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11741167/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Post acne erythema (PAE) is a common sequela of inflammatory acne vulgaris resulting from the dilatation of microcapillaries within the papillary dermis, thinning of the epidermis, and release of inflammatory cytokines. OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to compare the safety and efficacy of topical Brimonidine tartrate 0.33% gel versus A 577-nm pro-yellow laser for treatment of post acne erythema.

Methods: This was a comparative study, randomized clinical trials conducted on 60 adult patients with PAE. Patients were assigned into two groups: Group I included 30 patients who received brimonidine tartrate 0.33% gel once daily for three months, and Group II included 30 patients who received Pro-yellow laser with 577-nm therapy, for four sessions at three weeks intervals. Evaluation of erythema was done by Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA) and Patient's Self-Assessment (PSA) scales at baseline and at the end of the therapy. The dermoscopic images were analyzed for percent area of erythema and the optical density (OD) using ImageJ® freeware.

Results: Twenty-two patients (73.3%) were females and eight patients (26.7%) were males in Group I. In Group II, 20 patients (66.7%) were females and 10 patients (33.3%) were males. The mean±SD age of the studied groups was 22.07 years ±2.64 ranging from 20 to 24 years in Group I versus 20.93 years ±2.88 ranging from 19 to 23 years in Group II. Clinical improvement is distributed as follows among Group I; 56.7 percent are excellent, 56.7 percent good, 26.7 percent poor, and 10 percent fair for Group II; 33.3 percent good, 6.7 percent poor, and 60 percent excellent. There was no statistically significant difference between studied groups as regard Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA), Patient's Self-Assessment (PSA) mean area percentage and the optical density (OD) before treatment, while a statistically significant difference between studied groups after treatment was observed (p<0.001).

Conclusion: Topical brimonidine tartrate 0.33% gel and 577-nm pro yellow laser were effective and well tolerated therapeutic options for treatment of Post acne erythema (PAE), however the 577-nm Pro yellow laser was superior to brimonidine tartrate 0.33% gel.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外用0.33%酒石酸溴硝定凝胶与577 nm前黄激光治疗痤疮后红斑的比较研究。
背景:痤疮后红斑(PAE)是炎性寻常性痤疮的常见后遗症,是由真皮乳头状微血管扩张、表皮变薄和炎性细胞因子释放引起的。目的:比较外用0.33%酒石酸溴莫尼定凝胶与577 nm促黄激光治疗痤疮后红斑的安全性和有效性。方法:这是一项比较研究,随机临床试验对60例成年PAE患者进行了研究。患者被分为两组:第一组包括30名患者,每天一次接受0.33%的酒石酸溴硝定凝胶治疗,持续3个月;第二组包括30名患者,接受577 nm的Pro-yellow激光治疗,每隔3周进行4次治疗。在基线和治疗结束时,通过临床红斑评估(CEA)和患者自我评估(PSA)量表对红斑进行评估。使用ImageJ®免费软件分析皮肤镜图像红斑面积百分比和光密度(OD)。结果:第一组女性22例(73.3%),男性8例(26.7%)。第二组女性20例(66.7%),男性10例(33.3%)。两组患者的平均±SD年龄分别为20 ~ 24岁(22.07岁±2.64岁)和19 ~ 23岁(20.93岁±2.88岁)。第一组临床改善情况分布如下:第二组56.7%为优秀,56.7%为良好,26.7%为差,10%为一般;33.3%的学生表现良好,6.7%的学生表现不佳,60%的学生表现优秀。治疗前临床红斑评估(Clinician’s Erythema Assessment, CEA)、患者自我评估(Patient’s Self-Assessment, PSA)平均面积百分比和光密度(optical density, OD)两组间差异无统计学意义,治疗后两组间差异有统计学意义(p)。外用0.33%酒石酸溴胺凝胶和577 nm pro yellow激光治疗痤疮后红斑(PAE)是有效且耐受性良好的治疗选择,但577 nm pro yellow激光优于0.33%酒石酸溴胺凝胶。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
期刊最新文献
Can the Pursuit of an Ageless Face Redefine Medicine? Exploring Dermatology's Role in the Quest for Immortality. Comparison of Colony-forming Units of Malassezia spp. in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis with and without Response to Systemic Treatment. Large Basal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Combination Topical Therapy. Enhanced Clinical Outcomes and Treatment Adherence in Patients Using Compounded Topical Minoxidil to Treat Androgenetic and Traction Alopecia. Impact of Microencapsulated Benzoyl Peroxide on the Skin Microbiome and Clinical Outcomes in Rosacea: An Update on a Randomized, Double-blind, Crossover, Vehicle-controlled Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1