Nurse vs physician decision-making in the ED for short acting β2-agonist administration in pediatric asthma.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE American Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.016
Nitai A Levy, Shereen Hawash, Riad Shiekh, Idit Pasternak
{"title":"Nurse vs physician decision-making in the ED for short acting β2-agonist administration in pediatric asthma.","authors":"Nitai A Levy, Shereen Hawash, Riad Shiekh, Idit Pasternak","doi":"10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate triage nurses' clinical judgment in determining short acting β2-agonist bronchodilator therapy need for children with shortness of breath in the pediatric emergency department, without prior physician assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study compared decision-making between triage nurses and physicians regarding bronchodilator inhalation therapy necessity. Trained nurses assessed children aged 2-18 with shortness of breath, including history-taking, vital signs, and lung auscultation. Nurses made short acting β2-agonist therapy decisions based on predefined criteria. Pediatric specialists independently evaluated patients and recorded their decision.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of 62 assessments from 31 patients showed no statistically significant difference between nurses and doctors in administering inhaled bronchodilators (nurses: 87.1 %, doctors: 83.9 %). Clinical sign detection was similar, except for tachypnea (nurses: 48.4 %, doctors: 71 %, P = 0.07). McNemar's test and Cohen's kappa coefficient demonstrated strong nurse-doctor correlation per patient (accuracy: 83.9 %, P = 0.1; kappa: 0.351).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nurses excelled in recognizing certain clinical signs but showed lower compatibility in others. For severe cases, nurses consistently identified patients needing additional treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":55536,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"90 ","pages":"78-80"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.016","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate triage nurses' clinical judgment in determining short acting β2-agonist bronchodilator therapy need for children with shortness of breath in the pediatric emergency department, without prior physician assessment.

Methods: This prospective study compared decision-making between triage nurses and physicians regarding bronchodilator inhalation therapy necessity. Trained nurses assessed children aged 2-18 with shortness of breath, including history-taking, vital signs, and lung auscultation. Nurses made short acting β2-agonist therapy decisions based on predefined criteria. Pediatric specialists independently evaluated patients and recorded their decision.

Results: Analysis of 62 assessments from 31 patients showed no statistically significant difference between nurses and doctors in administering inhaled bronchodilators (nurses: 87.1 %, doctors: 83.9 %). Clinical sign detection was similar, except for tachypnea (nurses: 48.4 %, doctors: 71 %, P = 0.07). McNemar's test and Cohen's kappa coefficient demonstrated strong nurse-doctor correlation per patient (accuracy: 83.9 %, P = 0.1; kappa: 0.351).

Conclusions: Nurses excelled in recognizing certain clinical signs but showed lower compatibility in others. For severe cases, nurses consistently identified patients needing additional treatments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿科哮喘短效β2激动剂给药的急诊科护士与医生决策
目的:评价分诊护士在儿科急诊科为呼吸短促患儿在没有医师评估的情况下确定短效β2激动剂支气管扩张剂治疗需求时的临床判断。方法:本前瞻性研究比较了分诊护士和医生对支气管扩张剂吸入治疗必要性的决策。训练有素的护士对2-18岁呼吸短促的儿童进行评估,包括记录病史、生命体征和肺部听诊。护士根据预先确定的标准作出短效β2激动剂治疗决定。儿科专家独立评估患者并记录他们的决定。结果:对31例患者的62项评估进行分析,结果显示护士和医生在使用吸入性支气管扩张剂方面差异无统计学意义(护士占87.1%,医生占83.9%)。除呼吸急促外,护士占48.4%,医生占71%,P = 0.07。McNemar's检验和Cohen's kappa系数显示,每位患者的护士-医生相关性很强(准确率:83.9%,P = 0.1;卡帕:0.351)。结论:护士对某些临床症状的识别能力较强,但对其他临床症状的相容性较差。对于严重的病例,护士一致认为患者需要额外的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
730
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: A distinctive blend of practicality and scholarliness makes the American Journal of Emergency Medicine a key source for information on emergency medical care. Covering all activities concerned with emergency medicine, it is the journal to turn to for information to help increase the ability to understand, recognize and treat emergency conditions. Issues contain clinical articles, case reports, review articles, editorials, international notes, book reviews and more.
期刊最新文献
Sympathetic crashing acute pulmonary edema: Concerning CT, HFNO, and urapidil. MINOCA post-blood donation: Beyond volume loss. Response to the Letter: MINOCA Post-Blood Donation: Beyond Volume Loss. Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block for intraabdominal pain relief. An uncommon case of ptosis from invasive bacterial sinusitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1