Pain intensity and lower limb dynamic balance were related to the laterality judgment test of patients with patellofemoral pain.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Musculoskeletal Science and Practice Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1016/j.msksp.2025.103259
Luiza Ferreira Moreira, Vanessa Knust Coelho, Lucas Ferreira Mendonça, Felipe J J Reis, Gustavo Felicio Telles, Leandro Alberto Calazans Nogueira
{"title":"Pain intensity and lower limb dynamic balance were related to the laterality judgment test of patients with patellofemoral pain.","authors":"Luiza Ferreira Moreira, Vanessa Knust Coelho, Lucas Ferreira Mendonça, Felipe J J Reis, Gustavo Felicio Telles, Leandro Alberto Calazans Nogueira","doi":"10.1016/j.msksp.2025.103259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Laterality judgement evaluates the capacity to differentiate between the left and right sides of bodily parts. Cortical body representations are impaired in various musculoskeletal conditions, yet this remains unexplored in individuals with patellofemoral pain (PFP).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study compared laterality judgement performance between individuals with PFP and asymptomatic controls. Additionally, we investigated the relationship between laterality judgement and self-reported disability, physical performance, and dynamic stability within the PFP group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A secondary analysis encompassed 48 patients and 48 controls. Participants were examined for laterality judgement, pain intensity, knee disability, physical performance and lower limb dynamic balance. Statistical analyses included Student's t-test for group differences and linear regression to examine relationships between laterality judgement and other measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample comprised 60 males (62.5%) with a mean age of 31.3 years. The PFP group reported a mean pain duration of 37.6 months and moderate pain intensity (4/10). Laterality judgement accuracy and time were identical between the PFP group (78.3% and 2.1 s, respectively) and controls (80.8% and 2.2 s, respectively) (accuracy p = 0.50 and time p = 0.66). Lower limb dynamic and pain intensity were related to laterality judgement accuracy (β = 0.4, p < 0.01) and time (β = 0.4, p = 0.03), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PFP and control groups demonstrated similar laterality judgement performance. In the PFP group, lower laterality judgement accuracy was related to dynamic balance and lower laterality judgement time was related to pain intensity. The physical performance and self-reported knee disability were not related to the knee laterality judgment of these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":56036,"journal":{"name":"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice","volume":"76 ","pages":"103259"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2025.103259","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Laterality judgement evaluates the capacity to differentiate between the left and right sides of bodily parts. Cortical body representations are impaired in various musculoskeletal conditions, yet this remains unexplored in individuals with patellofemoral pain (PFP).

Objective: This study compared laterality judgement performance between individuals with PFP and asymptomatic controls. Additionally, we investigated the relationship between laterality judgement and self-reported disability, physical performance, and dynamic stability within the PFP group.

Methods: A secondary analysis encompassed 48 patients and 48 controls. Participants were examined for laterality judgement, pain intensity, knee disability, physical performance and lower limb dynamic balance. Statistical analyses included Student's t-test for group differences and linear regression to examine relationships between laterality judgement and other measurements.

Results: The sample comprised 60 males (62.5%) with a mean age of 31.3 years. The PFP group reported a mean pain duration of 37.6 months and moderate pain intensity (4/10). Laterality judgement accuracy and time were identical between the PFP group (78.3% and 2.1 s, respectively) and controls (80.8% and 2.2 s, respectively) (accuracy p = 0.50 and time p = 0.66). Lower limb dynamic and pain intensity were related to laterality judgement accuracy (β = 0.4, p < 0.01) and time (β = 0.4, p = 0.03), respectively.

Conclusion: PFP and control groups demonstrated similar laterality judgement performance. In the PFP group, lower laterality judgement accuracy was related to dynamic balance and lower laterality judgement time was related to pain intensity. The physical performance and self-reported knee disability were not related to the knee laterality judgment of these patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
疼痛强度和下肢动态平衡与髌股痛患者侧位判断测验有关。
侧边性判断评估区分身体部位左右两侧的能力。皮质体表征在各种肌肉骨骼疾病中受损,但这在髌股痛(PFP)患者中仍未得到研究。目的:本研究比较PFP患者和无症状对照组的侧偏性判断能力。此外,我们调查了PFP组中侧偏性判断与自我报告的残疾、身体表现和动态稳定性之间的关系。方法:对48例患者和48例对照组进行二次分析。参与者被检查了侧偏性判断、疼痛强度、膝关节残疾、身体表现和下肢动态平衡。统计分析包括组间差异的学生t检验和检验偏侧性判断与其他测量之间关系的线性回归。结果:男性60例(62.5%),平均年龄31.3岁。PFP组的平均疼痛持续时间为37.6个月,疼痛强度中等(4/10)。PFP组侧偏性判断正确率(78.3%)和时间(2.1 s)与对照组(80.8%)相同(正确率p = 0.50,时间p = 0.66)。下肢动力和疼痛强度与侧侧判断准确性相关(β = 0.4, p)。结论:PFP组与对照组侧侧判断能力相近。在PFP组中,较低的侧偏判断准确度与动态平衡有关,较低的侧偏判断时间与疼痛强度有关。这些患者的体能表现和自述的膝关节残疾与膝关节偏侧性判断无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.70%
发文量
152
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Musculoskeletal Science & Practice, international journal of musculoskeletal physiotherapy, is a peer-reviewed international journal (previously Manual Therapy), publishing high quality original research, review and Masterclass articles that contribute to improving the clinical understanding of appropriate care processes for musculoskeletal disorders. The journal publishes articles that influence or add to the body of evidence on diagnostic and therapeutic processes, patient centered care, guidelines for musculoskeletal therapeutics and theoretical models that support developments in assessment, diagnosis, clinical reasoning and interventions.
期刊最新文献
Sensorimotor control and neurocognitive performance in musculoskeletal disease and injury control. IFOMPT's Educational Standards and International Monitoring: A member survey and review. The prognostic reasoning by physiotherapists of musculoskeletal disorders: A phenomenological exploratory study. Validity and reliability of the Danish version of the Short Form Brief Pain Inventory. Do patients with fibromyalgia syndrome receive updated management strategies? A web-based survey among Italian physiotherapists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1