Effect of the nursing process with standardized taxonomy on bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy in outpatients.

Humeyra Zengin, Ayfer Tezel
{"title":"Effect of the nursing process with standardized taxonomy on bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy in outpatients.","authors":"Humeyra Zengin, Ayfer Tezel","doi":"10.1016/j.enfcle.2025.102136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to examine the effect of the nursing process applied by using standard nursing terminologies on colonoscopy preparation of outpatients on bowel cleansing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sample of the prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled study consisted of 116 patients (intervention n = 57, control n = 59). Both groups were interviewed face to face one week before the procedure day, nursing diagnoses were determined individually, and nursing outcome scales were employed as a baseline assessment. In the intervention group, the nursing process was applied to the patients with standard nursing terminology, training was given with an information booklet, and then the preparation instructions were reminded through telephone calls, text messages and instant messages. The adequacy of bowel cleansing was evaluated by the endoscopist using Boston Bowel Preparation Score (BBPS) who blindly performed the procedure for both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean BBPS score of the intervention group was 7.00 ± 1.43, and the control group was 4.16 ± 2.15. A significant difference found between the rates of adequate preparation in the intervention group (82.5%) and in the control group (16.9%) (P < .05). A significant difference was found after the intervention in terms of nursing outcome scales (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>According to the study adequate preparation for the colonoscopy procedure can be achieved by applying the nursing process based on NANDA-I, NOC and NIC.</p>","PeriodicalId":72917,"journal":{"name":"Enfermeria clinica (English Edition)","volume":" ","pages":"102136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermeria clinica (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcle.2025.102136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the effect of the nursing process applied by using standard nursing terminologies on colonoscopy preparation of outpatients on bowel cleansing.

Methods: The sample of the prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled study consisted of 116 patients (intervention n = 57, control n = 59). Both groups were interviewed face to face one week before the procedure day, nursing diagnoses were determined individually, and nursing outcome scales were employed as a baseline assessment. In the intervention group, the nursing process was applied to the patients with standard nursing terminology, training was given with an information booklet, and then the preparation instructions were reminded through telephone calls, text messages and instant messages. The adequacy of bowel cleansing was evaluated by the endoscopist using Boston Bowel Preparation Score (BBPS) who blindly performed the procedure for both groups.

Results: The mean BBPS score of the intervention group was 7.00 ± 1.43, and the control group was 4.16 ± 2.15. A significant difference found between the rates of adequate preparation in the intervention group (82.5%) and in the control group (16.9%) (P < .05). A significant difference was found after the intervention in terms of nursing outcome scales (P < .05).

Conclusions: According to the study adequate preparation for the colonoscopy procedure can be achieved by applying the nursing process based on NANDA-I, NOC and NIC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
标准化分类护理流程对门诊结肠镜检查前肠道清洁的影响。
目的:本研究的目的是探讨使用标准护理术语的护理过程应用于门诊患者肠镜检查准备肠清洁的效果。方法:前瞻性、单盲、随机对照研究116例患者(干预组57例,对照组59例)。两组于手术日前一周进行面对面访谈,分别确定护理诊断,并采用护理结果量表作为基线评估。干预组采用标准护理术语对患者实施护理流程,并发放资料手册进行培训,然后通过电话、短信、即时消息等方式提醒患者护理准备说明。内窥镜医师使用波士顿肠道准备评分(BBPS)来评估肠道清洁的充分性,该医师对两组进行了盲操作。结果:干预组BBPS评分平均为7.00±1.43分,对照组为4.16±2.15分。干预组充分准备率为82.5%,对照组为16.9%,差异有统计学意义(P)。结论:应用NANDA-I、NOC和NIC为基础的护理流程,可达到结肠镜检查的充分准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Characterization of the alcohol consumption pattern of patients admitted to a hospitalization unit. Effect of the nursing process with standardized taxonomy on bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy in outpatients. Emergency nursing staff's well-being, burnout, and sleep on 12-hour shifts. Perceived satisfaction and humanized nursing care in surgical patients public hospital of Peru. Scope of nursing practice in medical-surgical hospitalization and intensive care units.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1