Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury: Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Versus First Vaginal Delivery.

IF 0.8 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.) Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1097/SPV.0000000000001647
Brigid S Mumford, Lara Lemon, John Harris, Lauren E Giugale
{"title":"Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury: Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Versus First Vaginal Delivery.","authors":"Brigid S Mumford, Lara Lemon, John Harris, Lauren E Giugale","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Modern data regarding the relationship between vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) and obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) are minimal with mixed results.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to determine if VBAC is associated with an increased risk of OASIs.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of liveborn deliveries from 2018 to 2022 within a large, multihospital academic health system. The primary outcome was the proportion of OASIs compared between patients who underwent a first vaginal delivery (primiparous vaginal delivery group) versus patients who underwent a first VBAC (VBAC group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 17,044 patients were included. A total of 16,208 had a primiparous vaginal delivery and 836 underwent VBAC. Vaginal birth after cesarean patients were older (29.9 vs 27.0 years, P < 0.01), more likely to self-identify as Black or Asian race (26.1% vs 18.0%, P < 0.01), and had lower maternal weight (182.7 vs 187.2 lbs, P < 0.01). The proportion of OASIs was significantly higher in the VBAC group (6.9% vs 5.1%, P = 0.02). Vacuum-assisted vaginal deliveries were more common in the VBAC group (7.7% vs 5.4%, P < 0.01).On multivariable logistic regression, VBAC was not significantly associated with OASIS (odds ratio [OR] = 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.75-1.36, P = 0.95). Operative vaginal delivery (OR = 6.44, CI = 5.51-7.52, P < 0.01), older maternal age (OR = 1.05, CI = 1.03-1.07), and Asian race (OR 2.62, CI = 2.10-3.26) demonstrated increased odds of OASIs. Patients who identified as Black demonstrated lower odds of OASIs (OR = 0.68, CI = 0.50-0.93).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While there was a greater proportion of OASIs in the VBAC group compared to the primiparous vaginal delivery group, VBAC was not an independent risk factor.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001647","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Modern data regarding the relationship between vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) and obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) are minimal with mixed results.

Objective: The aim of the study was to determine if VBAC is associated with an increased risk of OASIs.

Study design: This was a retrospective cohort study of liveborn deliveries from 2018 to 2022 within a large, multihospital academic health system. The primary outcome was the proportion of OASIs compared between patients who underwent a first vaginal delivery (primiparous vaginal delivery group) versus patients who underwent a first VBAC (VBAC group).

Results: A total of 17,044 patients were included. A total of 16,208 had a primiparous vaginal delivery and 836 underwent VBAC. Vaginal birth after cesarean patients were older (29.9 vs 27.0 years, P < 0.01), more likely to self-identify as Black or Asian race (26.1% vs 18.0%, P < 0.01), and had lower maternal weight (182.7 vs 187.2 lbs, P < 0.01). The proportion of OASIs was significantly higher in the VBAC group (6.9% vs 5.1%, P = 0.02). Vacuum-assisted vaginal deliveries were more common in the VBAC group (7.7% vs 5.4%, P < 0.01).On multivariable logistic regression, VBAC was not significantly associated with OASIS (odds ratio [OR] = 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.75-1.36, P = 0.95). Operative vaginal delivery (OR = 6.44, CI = 5.51-7.52, P < 0.01), older maternal age (OR = 1.05, CI = 1.03-1.07), and Asian race (OR 2.62, CI = 2.10-3.26) demonstrated increased odds of OASIs. Patients who identified as Black demonstrated lower odds of OASIs (OR = 0.68, CI = 0.50-0.93).

Conclusions: While there was a greater proportion of OASIs in the VBAC group compared to the primiparous vaginal delivery group, VBAC was not an independent risk factor.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产科肛门括约肌损伤:剖宫产后阴道分娩与首次阴道分娩。
重要性:关于剖宫产后阴道分娩(VBAC)和产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASI)之间关系的现代数据很少,结果好坏参半。目的:该研究的目的是确定VBAC是否与OASIs风险增加有关。研究设计:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是一个大型多医院学术卫生系统中2018年至2022年的活产分娩。主要结局是比较首次阴道分娩(阴道分娩组)和首次VBAC (VBAC组)患者之间的OASIs比例。结果:共纳入患者17044例。共有16,208人进行了阴道分娩,836人进行了VBAC。剖宫产后阴道分娩的患者年龄较大(29.9 vs 27.0岁,P < 0.01),自我认同为黑人或亚洲种族的可能性较大(26.1% vs 18.0%, P < 0.01),母亲体重较低(182.7 vs 187.2 lbs, P < 0.01)。VBAC组OASIs比例显著高于对照组(6.9% vs 5.1%, P = 0.02)。真空辅助阴道分娩在VBAC组更为常见(7.7% vs 5.4%, P < 0.01)。在多变量logistic回归中,VBAC与OASIS无显著相关(比值比[OR] = 1.01, 95%可信区间[CI] = 0.75-1.36, P = 0.95)。阴道手术分娩(OR = 6.44, CI = 5.51 ~ 7.52, P < 0.01)、产妇年龄较大(OR = 1.05, CI = 1.03 ~ 1.07)、亚洲种族(OR 2.62, CI = 2.10 ~ 3.26)均增加了OASIs的发生几率。确诊为Black的患者出现OASIs的几率较低(OR = 0.68, CI = 0.50-0.93)。结论:虽然VBAC组的OASIs比例高于阴道初产组,但VBAC并不是一个独立的危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adverse Events Associated With Female External Urinary Collection Devices. Tamsulosin to Prevent Urinary Retention After Vaginal Urogynecologic Surgery. The Effect of Concomitant Hysterectomy Route on Robotic Sacrocolpopexy Outcomes. Urogynecology Research Is Underrepresented in Top Obstetrics and Gynecology Journals. Treatment Crossover Following Advanced Therapy for Overactive Bladder Syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1