Longitudinal impact of impulsivity and sensation-seeking on vaping initiation: The moderating role of peer vaping

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Addictive behaviors Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1016/j.addbeh.2025.108264
Caroline North , Keryn E. Pasch , Miguel Pinedo , Anna V. Wilkinson , Alexandra Loukas
{"title":"Longitudinal impact of impulsivity and sensation-seeking on vaping initiation: The moderating role of peer vaping","authors":"Caroline North ,&nbsp;Keryn E. Pasch ,&nbsp;Miguel Pinedo ,&nbsp;Anna V. Wilkinson ,&nbsp;Alexandra Loukas","doi":"10.1016/j.addbeh.2025.108264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Limited research indicates impulsivity and sensation-seeking are associated with electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) use in young adulthood, however, no study has examined the moderating effect of peer ENDS use on these associations. We examined the impacts of impulsivity and sensation-seeking on ENDS use initiation and determined if peer ENDS use moderates these associations. Participants were 2,590 ENDS naïve (i.e., never used ENDS) young adults involved in multi-wave, 4.5-year longitudinal study (Fall, 2014 – Spring, 2019). At baseline, participants were 18–25 years old (<em>M</em> = 20.1; <em>SD</em> = 1.8), 66.5 % female, 34.2 % non-Hispanic white, 28.1 % Hispanic/Latino, 8.6 % Black, 21.6 % Asian, and 7.4 % identified as another race/ethnicity. Cox’s regression models were used to test hypotheses. Predictors were time-varying impulsivity and sensation-seeking, and the moderator was time-varying peer ENDS use. The outcome, ENDS use initiation, was assessed by querying ever ENDS use over 7 follow-up waves. Covariates included socio-demographic characteristics, past 30-day other tobacco use, cannabis use, and binge drinking. Nearly 29% of participants initiated ENDS use during the study period. Sensation-seeking predicted an increased risk of initiating ENDS use (HR = 1.12, 95 %CI:1.03,1.22), but impulsivity did not. Although peer ENDS use directly predicted an increased risk for initiating ENDS use (HR = 1.57, 95 %CI:1.46, 1.68), peer ENDS use did not moderate the associations of impulsivity and sensation-seeking on ENDS use initiation. The role of sensation-seeking on ENDS use initiation is independent of peer use. Prevention programs tailored to those high in sensation-seeking may consider changing attitudes about how desires for novel experiences can be achieved through healthier behaviors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7155,"journal":{"name":"Addictive behaviors","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 108264"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addictive behaviors","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030646032500019X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Limited research indicates impulsivity and sensation-seeking are associated with electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) use in young adulthood, however, no study has examined the moderating effect of peer ENDS use on these associations. We examined the impacts of impulsivity and sensation-seeking on ENDS use initiation and determined if peer ENDS use moderates these associations. Participants were 2,590 ENDS naïve (i.e., never used ENDS) young adults involved in multi-wave, 4.5-year longitudinal study (Fall, 2014 – Spring, 2019). At baseline, participants were 18–25 years old (M = 20.1; SD = 1.8), 66.5 % female, 34.2 % non-Hispanic white, 28.1 % Hispanic/Latino, 8.6 % Black, 21.6 % Asian, and 7.4 % identified as another race/ethnicity. Cox’s regression models were used to test hypotheses. Predictors were time-varying impulsivity and sensation-seeking, and the moderator was time-varying peer ENDS use. The outcome, ENDS use initiation, was assessed by querying ever ENDS use over 7 follow-up waves. Covariates included socio-demographic characteristics, past 30-day other tobacco use, cannabis use, and binge drinking. Nearly 29% of participants initiated ENDS use during the study period. Sensation-seeking predicted an increased risk of initiating ENDS use (HR = 1.12, 95 %CI:1.03,1.22), but impulsivity did not. Although peer ENDS use directly predicted an increased risk for initiating ENDS use (HR = 1.57, 95 %CI:1.46, 1.68), peer ENDS use did not moderate the associations of impulsivity and sensation-seeking on ENDS use initiation. The role of sensation-seeking on ENDS use initiation is independent of peer use. Prevention programs tailored to those high in sensation-seeking may consider changing attitudes about how desires for novel experiences can be achieved through healthier behaviors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冲动性和感觉寻求对电子烟起始的纵向影响:同伴电子烟的调节作用。
有限的研究表明,冲动性和寻求感觉与年轻人使用电子尼古丁传递系统(ENDS)有关,然而,没有研究检验同伴使用电子尼古丁传递系统对这些关联的调节作用。我们研究了冲动性和感觉寻求对终端使用的影响,并确定同伴终端使用是否会调节这些关联。参与者为2590名ENDS naïve(即从未使用过ENDS)年轻人,参与了一项为期4.5年的多波纵向研究(2014年秋季至2019年春季)。在基线时,参与者年龄为18-25岁(M = 20.1;SD = 1.8), 66.5%为女性,34.2%为非西班牙裔白人,28.1%为西班牙裔/拉丁裔,8.6%为黑人,21.6%为亚洲人,7.4%为其他种族/族裔。采用Cox回归模型对假设进行检验。预测因子为时变冲动性和感觉寻求,调节因子为时变同伴终端使用。结果,ENDS使用起始,通过查询7个随访期的ENDS使用情况来评估。协变量包括社会人口统计学特征、过去30天的其他烟草使用、大麻使用和酗酒。近29%的参与者在研究期间开始使用终端。感觉寻求预示着终端使用的风险增加(HR = 1.12, 95% CI:1.03,1.22),但冲动性没有。虽然同伴使用终端直接预测终端使用的风险增加(HR = 1.57, 95% CI:1.46, 1.68),但同伴使用终端并没有调节冲动和感觉寻求对终端使用启动的关联。感觉寻求在终端使用启动中的作用与同伴使用无关。针对那些高度寻求刺激的人量身定制的预防项目可能会考虑改变人们对如何通过更健康的行为来实现对新奇体验的渴望的态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Addictive behaviors
Addictive behaviors 医学-药物滥用
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
283
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Addictive Behaviors is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing high quality human research on addictive behaviors and disorders since 1975. The journal accepts submissions of full-length papers and short communications on substance-related addictions such as the abuse of alcohol, drugs and nicotine, and behavioral addictions involving gambling and technology. We primarily publish behavioral and psychosocial research but our articles span the fields of psychology, sociology, psychiatry, epidemiology, social policy, medicine, pharmacology and neuroscience. While theoretical orientations are diverse, the emphasis of the journal is primarily empirical. That is, sound experimental design combined with valid, reliable assessment and evaluation procedures are a requisite for acceptance. However, innovative and empirically oriented case studies that might encourage new lines of inquiry are accepted as well. Studies that clearly contribute to current knowledge of etiology, prevention, social policy or treatment are given priority. Scholarly commentaries on topical issues, systematic reviews, and mini reviews are encouraged. We especially welcome multimedia papers that incorporate video or audio components to better display methodology or findings. Studies can also be submitted to Addictive Behaviors? companion title, the open access journal Addictive Behaviors Reports, which has a particular interest in ''non-traditional'', innovative and empirically-oriented research such as negative/null data papers, replication studies, case reports on novel treatments, and cross-cultural research.
期刊最新文献
Alcohol and cannabis as sleep aids among adolescents and associations with sleep quality and problematic use Editorial Board Factors influencing perceptions of electronic cigarette and nicotine replacement therapy use among French smokers experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage: A latent class analysis Adolescent extraversion and agreeableness predict adult alcohol use: A 22-Year prospective study Protective and risk factors in problematic mobile phone use among adolescents: A three-wave longitude study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1