Endocrinologists' Acceptability and Implementation of Hemoglobin A1c Targets among Adults with Type 1 Diabetes.

Sanchit Kaushal, Patience Fakembe, Ilana J Halperin, Gillian A Hawker, Alanna Weisman
{"title":"Endocrinologists' Acceptability and Implementation of Hemoglobin A1c Targets among Adults with Type 1 Diabetes.","authors":"Sanchit Kaushal, Patience Fakembe, Ilana J Halperin, Gillian A Hawker, Alanna Weisman","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjd.2024.12.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Attainment of the A1C target of ≤7.0% is consistently low among those living with type 1 diabetes (T1D). We evaluated endocrinologists' acceptability and implementation of A1C targets.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All 309 adult endocrinologists in Ontario were invited to complete an online questionnaire between October 31, 2023 and Jan 16, 2024. The questionnaire consisted of four sections: 1) Acceptability of the A1C target of ≤7.0%, evaluated by agreement with statements pertaining to the seven domains of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA); 2) Endocrinologists' perceptions of patient attainment of A1C targets, frequency of setting and discussing A1c targets, common targets used, and open-ended questions regarding A1C targets; 3) Influence of patient characteristics on selecting individualized A1C targets different from 7.0%; and 4) Respondent characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>148 endocrinologists (48%) completed the questionnaire. Endocrinologists agreed that the A1C target of ≤7.0% is important (87% agreed or strongly agreed) and the correct threshold (75% agreed or strongly agreed). However, endocrinologists over-estimated A1C target attainment among their own patients, and recognized the A1C target of <7.0% may be unrealistic for patients, difficult to achieve, and could cause patient distress. Patients' psychosocial characteristics (such as mental health disorders) and use of technologies (such as continuous glucose monitors and automated insulin delivery systems) emerged as important yet previously under-emphasized factors when selecting individualized A1C targets.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Endocrinologists endorsed the A1C target of ≤7.0%, yet simultaneously expressed concerns regarding its feasibility. Future studies should evaluate how this discrepancy might impact physician discussions and counselling regarding A1C targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":93918,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of diabetes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjd.2024.12.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Attainment of the A1C target of ≤7.0% is consistently low among those living with type 1 diabetes (T1D). We evaluated endocrinologists' acceptability and implementation of A1C targets.

Methods: All 309 adult endocrinologists in Ontario were invited to complete an online questionnaire between October 31, 2023 and Jan 16, 2024. The questionnaire consisted of four sections: 1) Acceptability of the A1C target of ≤7.0%, evaluated by agreement with statements pertaining to the seven domains of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA); 2) Endocrinologists' perceptions of patient attainment of A1C targets, frequency of setting and discussing A1c targets, common targets used, and open-ended questions regarding A1C targets; 3) Influence of patient characteristics on selecting individualized A1C targets different from 7.0%; and 4) Respondent characteristics.

Results: 148 endocrinologists (48%) completed the questionnaire. Endocrinologists agreed that the A1C target of ≤7.0% is important (87% agreed or strongly agreed) and the correct threshold (75% agreed or strongly agreed). However, endocrinologists over-estimated A1C target attainment among their own patients, and recognized the A1C target of <7.0% may be unrealistic for patients, difficult to achieve, and could cause patient distress. Patients' psychosocial characteristics (such as mental health disorders) and use of technologies (such as continuous glucose monitors and automated insulin delivery systems) emerged as important yet previously under-emphasized factors when selecting individualized A1C targets.

Conclusions: Endocrinologists endorsed the A1C target of ≤7.0%, yet simultaneously expressed concerns regarding its feasibility. Future studies should evaluate how this discrepancy might impact physician discussions and counselling regarding A1C targets.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内分泌学家对成人1型糖尿病患者糖化血红蛋白指标的接受度和实施
目的:在1型糖尿病(T1D)患者中,A1C≤7.0%的达标率一直很低。我们评估了内分泌学家对A1C指标的可接受性和执行情况。方法:在2023年10月31日至2024年1月16日期间,安大略省所有309名成年内分泌学家被邀请完成一份在线问卷。问卷由四个部分组成:1)糖化血红蛋白目标≤7.0%的可接受性,通过与可接受性理论框架(TFA)的七个领域相关的陈述进行评估;2)内分泌科医师对患者A1C达标的认知、设定和讨论A1C达标的频率、常用的A1C达标指标、关于A1C达标的开放式问题;3)不同患者特征对选择个体化A1C目标的影响(7.0%);4)被调查者特征。结果:148名内分泌科医师(48%)完成问卷调查。内分泌学家认为A1C≤7.0%的目标是重要的(87%同意或强烈同意)和正确的阈值(75%同意或强烈同意)。结论:内分泌科医师认可≤7.0%的A1C目标,但同时对其可行性表示担忧。未来的研究应该评估这种差异如何影响医生讨论和咨询A1C目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
High Prevalence and Common Forms of Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young in Greenland. Endocrinologists' Acceptability and Implementation of Hemoglobin A1c Targets among Adults with Type 1 Diabetes. "Critical Insights on Promoting Self-Management in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: Development and Validation of the Glucose Monitoring Impact Scale." Describing a Transition to Adult Type 1 Diabetes Care Model at the McGill University Health Centre. Possible drug-interaction between elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor and repaglinide in an adult with cystic fibrosis-related diabetes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1