Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: Findings from the Diabetes Landeck Cohort.

Veronika Haslwanter, Lára R Hallson, Ursula Rochau, Uwe Siebert, Hans Robert Schönherr, Wilhelm Oberaigner
{"title":"Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: Findings from the Diabetes Landeck Cohort.","authors":"Veronika Haslwanter, Lára R Hallson, Ursula Rochau, Uwe Siebert, Hans Robert Schönherr, Wilhelm Oberaigner","doi":"10.1055/a-2496-2062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Maintaining and optimizing quality of life (QoL) is a central issue and one of the most important goals in therapy for patients with chronic diseases, such as diabetes mellitus (DM). Despite its importance, there is little data on the QoL of patients with DM in Austria. The objective of this study was to extend an established population-based cohort, the Diabetes-Landeck cohort, by including patient-reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a survey on quality of life (QoL) and treatment satisfaction in patients from the Diabetes-Landeck cohort using the EQ-5D-5L, the problem areas in diabetes survey (PAID), and the diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire (DTSQ). Mean sum scores were calculated and compared between patient characteristic subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total 58 patients were recruited, with a mean age of 63 years and a mean hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of 7.1%. The mean sum score of EQ-5D-5L was 92 (SD=10.6), and that of DTSQ and PAID were 32.2 (SD=6.6) and 10.8 (SD=11.6), respectively. Patients with obesity (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) showed a statistically significant decreased mean sum score of EQ-5D-5L and a statistically significant increased mean sum score of DTSQ. Patients with HbA1c ≥7.5% showed a statistically significant decreased mean sum score of DTSQ.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We observed patient-reported outcomes significantly associated with obesity and HbA1c, which could be used for targeted patient monitoring. Limited by small sample size and questions in generalizability, we strongly suggest the rollout of a larger study.</p>","PeriodicalId":94001,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes : official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes : official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2496-2062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Maintaining and optimizing quality of life (QoL) is a central issue and one of the most important goals in therapy for patients with chronic diseases, such as diabetes mellitus (DM). Despite its importance, there is little data on the QoL of patients with DM in Austria. The objective of this study was to extend an established population-based cohort, the Diabetes-Landeck cohort, by including patient-reported outcomes.

Methods: We performed a survey on quality of life (QoL) and treatment satisfaction in patients from the Diabetes-Landeck cohort using the EQ-5D-5L, the problem areas in diabetes survey (PAID), and the diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire (DTSQ). Mean sum scores were calculated and compared between patient characteristic subgroups.

Results: In total 58 patients were recruited, with a mean age of 63 years and a mean hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of 7.1%. The mean sum score of EQ-5D-5L was 92 (SD=10.6), and that of DTSQ and PAID were 32.2 (SD=6.6) and 10.8 (SD=11.6), respectively. Patients with obesity (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2) showed a statistically significant decreased mean sum score of EQ-5D-5L and a statistically significant increased mean sum score of DTSQ. Patients with HbA1c ≥7.5% showed a statistically significant decreased mean sum score of DTSQ.

Conclusion: We observed patient-reported outcomes significantly associated with obesity and HbA1c, which could be used for targeted patient monitoring. Limited by small sample size and questions in generalizability, we strongly suggest the rollout of a larger study.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
糖尿病患者报告的结果测量:来自糖尿病Landeck队列的发现。
维持和优化生活质量(QoL)是慢性疾病(如糖尿病(DM))患者治疗的中心问题和最重要的目标之一。尽管它很重要,但关于奥地利糖尿病患者生活质量的数据很少。本研究的目的是通过纳入患者报告的结果来扩展已建立的基于人群的队列,即糖尿病-兰德克队列。方法:采用EQ-5D-5L量表、糖尿病问题区问卷(PAID)和糖尿病治疗满意度问卷(DTSQ)对diabetes - landeck队列患者的生活质量(QoL)和治疗满意度进行调查。计算患者特征亚组之间的平均和评分并进行比较。结果:共招募了58例患者,平均年龄63岁,平均血红蛋白A1c (HbA1c)为7.1%。EQ-5D-5L的平均总得分为92分(SD=10.6), DTSQ和PAID的平均总得分分别为32.2分(SD=6.6)和10.8分(SD=11.6)。肥胖(体重指数≥30 kg/m2)患者EQ-5D-5L平均总评分降低,DTSQ平均总评分升高,差异有统计学意义。HbA1c≥7.5%的患者DTSQ平均总评分降低具有统计学意义。结论:我们观察到患者报告的结局与肥胖和HbA1c显著相关,可用于患者的靶向监测。由于样本量小,且存在普遍性问题,我们强烈建议开展更大规模的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Diagnostic Performances of ATA Guidelines, ACR-TIRADS, and EU-TIRADS and Modified K-TIRADS: A Single Center Study of 4238 Thyroid Nodules. Does Improvement of Glycemic Control Cause Acute Charcot Foot in Patients with Diabetes? Anxiety and Depression in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: An Analysis Using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in Women from a Low-Income Country. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: Findings from the Diabetes Landeck Cohort. Shwachman-Diamond Syndrome and Diabetes: An Update from the Italian Registry and Review of the Literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1