‘Wisdom Is Knowledge Plus Experience’: Qualitative Study of Lived Experience and Researcher Perspectives on Suicide Research Co-Production

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING International Journal of Mental Health Nursing Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1111/inm.13507
Karolina Krysinska, Ingrid Ozols, Trisnasari Fraser, Michelle Banfield, Jacinta Hawgood, Kairi Kõlves, Victoria Ross, Martina McGrath, Bronwen Edwards, Karl Andriessen
{"title":"‘Wisdom Is Knowledge Plus Experience’: Qualitative Study of Lived Experience and Researcher Perspectives on Suicide Research Co-Production","authors":"Karolina Krysinska,&nbsp;Ingrid Ozols,&nbsp;Trisnasari Fraser,&nbsp;Michelle Banfield,&nbsp;Jacinta Hawgood,&nbsp;Kairi Kõlves,&nbsp;Victoria Ross,&nbsp;Martina McGrath,&nbsp;Bronwen Edwards,&nbsp;Karl Andriessen","doi":"10.1111/inm.13507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The need for involvement of people with lived experience of suicide in the conduct of suicide research and intervention has been recognised in research and policy. However, there is limited understanding and guidance on how to support their genuine and safe engagement in suicide research. This qualitative study considered the perspectives of 19 people with lived experience of suicide, and 17 researchers engaged in suicide-related research to explore their needs, expectations and experience of co-produced suicide-related research. Data was collected between October and December 2020 via semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis resulted in five themes: (1) towards co-production, (2) power imbalances, (3) heterogeneity of lived experience, (4) enhancing safety and (5) value of co-production. Participants considered lived experience involvement at all stages of research to improve research impact and outcomes. However, persisting power imbalances were experienced by participants and participatory approaches did not always align with existing research systems and organisational structures. Complexities identified by participants related to accommodating different skills, experiences and social identities of those with a lived experience perspective and balancing safeguarding principles with strength-based approaches that may capitalise on participants' existing strengths. Delphi guidelines developed from an associated consensus study on active involvement of people with lived experience of suicide in suicide research address some of the concerns mentioned by study participants and form a useful resource to guide future research endeavours.</p>","PeriodicalId":14007,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11747945/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/inm.13507","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The need for involvement of people with lived experience of suicide in the conduct of suicide research and intervention has been recognised in research and policy. However, there is limited understanding and guidance on how to support their genuine and safe engagement in suicide research. This qualitative study considered the perspectives of 19 people with lived experience of suicide, and 17 researchers engaged in suicide-related research to explore their needs, expectations and experience of co-produced suicide-related research. Data was collected between October and December 2020 via semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis resulted in five themes: (1) towards co-production, (2) power imbalances, (3) heterogeneity of lived experience, (4) enhancing safety and (5) value of co-production. Participants considered lived experience involvement at all stages of research to improve research impact and outcomes. However, persisting power imbalances were experienced by participants and participatory approaches did not always align with existing research systems and organisational structures. Complexities identified by participants related to accommodating different skills, experiences and social identities of those with a lived experience perspective and balancing safeguarding principles with strength-based approaches that may capitalise on participants' existing strengths. Delphi guidelines developed from an associated consensus study on active involvement of people with lived experience of suicide in suicide research address some of the concerns mentioned by study participants and form a useful resource to guide future research endeavours.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“智慧是知识加经验”:生活经验的质性研究与自杀研究合作生产的研究者视角。
有过自杀经历的人参与自杀研究和干预的必要性已在研究和政策中得到认可。然而,对于如何支持他们真正安全地参与自杀研究,人们的理解和指导是有限的。本定性研究考虑了19位有过自杀经历的人以及17位从事自杀相关研究的研究者的观点,探讨他们对共同制作的自杀相关研究的需求、期望和经验。数据是在2020年10月至12月期间通过半结构化访谈收集的。主题分析得出五个主题:(1)走向合拍片;(2)权力失衡;(3)生活经验异质性;(4)增强合拍片的安全性;(5)合拍片的价值。参与者在研究的所有阶段都考虑了生活经验的参与,以提高研究的影响和结果。然而,参与者经历了持续的权力不平衡,参与式方法并不总是与现有的研究系统和组织结构保持一致。参与者确定的复杂性涉及适应具有生活经验视角的人的不同技能、经验和社会身份,以及平衡保护原则与可能利用参与者现有优势的基于优势的方法。德尔菲指南是根据一项关于有自杀生活经历的人积极参与自杀研究的相关共识研究制定的,解决了研究参与者提到的一些问题,并形成了指导未来研究工作的有用资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
8.90%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing is the official journal of the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc. It is a fully refereed journal that examines current trends and developments in mental health practice and research. The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing provides a forum for the exchange of ideas on all issues of relevance to mental health nursing. The Journal informs you of developments in mental health nursing practice and research, directions in education and training, professional issues, management approaches, policy development, ethical questions, theoretical inquiry, and clinical issues. The Journal publishes feature articles, review articles, clinical notes, research notes and book reviews. Contributions on any aspect of mental health nursing are welcomed. Statements and opinions expressed in the journal reflect the views of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc.
期刊最新文献
Investigating the Suitability of the Forensic Mental Health Nursing Clinical Reasoning Cycle for Nurses Working in Generalist Mental Health Settings Promoting Personal Recovery Within Psychiatric Inpatient Care—Nurses' Experiences Understanding Perinatal Mental Health: A Systems Science Approach to Identify Common Drivers and Opportunities for Intervention Developing a Mobile App to Prevent Suicide Based on a Software Development Life Cycle: Application of Ecological Momentary Assessment and Interventions Graduate Nurses in Acute Mental Health Settings and Their Viewpoints of Nursing Education to Support Their Transition to Mental Health Nursing: A Q Methodology Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1