Karolina Krysinska, Ingrid Ozols, Trisnasari Fraser, Michelle Banfield, Jacinta Hawgood, Kairi Kõlves, Victoria Ross, Martina McGrath, Bronwen Edwards, Karl Andriessen
{"title":"‘Wisdom Is Knowledge Plus Experience’: Qualitative Study of Lived Experience and Researcher Perspectives on Suicide Research Co-Production","authors":"Karolina Krysinska, Ingrid Ozols, Trisnasari Fraser, Michelle Banfield, Jacinta Hawgood, Kairi Kõlves, Victoria Ross, Martina McGrath, Bronwen Edwards, Karl Andriessen","doi":"10.1111/inm.13507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The need for involvement of people with lived experience of suicide in the conduct of suicide research and intervention has been recognised in research and policy. However, there is limited understanding and guidance on how to support their genuine and safe engagement in suicide research. This qualitative study considered the perspectives of 19 people with lived experience of suicide, and 17 researchers engaged in suicide-related research to explore their needs, expectations and experience of co-produced suicide-related research. Data was collected between October and December 2020 via semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis resulted in five themes: (1) towards co-production, (2) power imbalances, (3) heterogeneity of lived experience, (4) enhancing safety and (5) value of co-production. Participants considered lived experience involvement at all stages of research to improve research impact and outcomes. However, persisting power imbalances were experienced by participants and participatory approaches did not always align with existing research systems and organisational structures. Complexities identified by participants related to accommodating different skills, experiences and social identities of those with a lived experience perspective and balancing safeguarding principles with strength-based approaches that may capitalise on participants' existing strengths. Delphi guidelines developed from an associated consensus study on active involvement of people with lived experience of suicide in suicide research address some of the concerns mentioned by study participants and form a useful resource to guide future research endeavours.</p>","PeriodicalId":14007,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11747945/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/inm.13507","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The need for involvement of people with lived experience of suicide in the conduct of suicide research and intervention has been recognised in research and policy. However, there is limited understanding and guidance on how to support their genuine and safe engagement in suicide research. This qualitative study considered the perspectives of 19 people with lived experience of suicide, and 17 researchers engaged in suicide-related research to explore their needs, expectations and experience of co-produced suicide-related research. Data was collected between October and December 2020 via semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis resulted in five themes: (1) towards co-production, (2) power imbalances, (3) heterogeneity of lived experience, (4) enhancing safety and (5) value of co-production. Participants considered lived experience involvement at all stages of research to improve research impact and outcomes. However, persisting power imbalances were experienced by participants and participatory approaches did not always align with existing research systems and organisational structures. Complexities identified by participants related to accommodating different skills, experiences and social identities of those with a lived experience perspective and balancing safeguarding principles with strength-based approaches that may capitalise on participants' existing strengths. Delphi guidelines developed from an associated consensus study on active involvement of people with lived experience of suicide in suicide research address some of the concerns mentioned by study participants and form a useful resource to guide future research endeavours.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing is the official journal of the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc. It is a fully refereed journal that examines current trends and developments in mental health practice and research.
The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing provides a forum for the exchange of ideas on all issues of relevance to mental health nursing. The Journal informs you of developments in mental health nursing practice and research, directions in education and training, professional issues, management approaches, policy development, ethical questions, theoretical inquiry, and clinical issues.
The Journal publishes feature articles, review articles, clinical notes, research notes and book reviews. Contributions on any aspect of mental health nursing are welcomed.
Statements and opinions expressed in the journal reflect the views of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc.